Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of " web 2.0": An inter-disciplinary literature and website review

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 79, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 391-400

  Adams, Samantha A ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Consumer health; Internet; Reliability; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

ANONYMITY AND PRIVACY; COLLABORATIVE WEB APPLICATIONS; END-USERS; INFORMATION CREATION; INFORMATION QUALITY; LITERATURE REVIEWS; NETWORK EXTERNALITY; ONLINE HEALTH INFORMATION; PATIENT EDUCATION; POTENTIAL PROBLEMS; SOCIAL SCIENTISTS; TEXT-BASED INFORMATION; WEB 2.0; WEB 2.0 APPLICATIONS; WEB APPLICATION;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; DATA MINING; HEALTH CARE; INTERNET; WEB SERVICES;

RELIABILITY;

ACCURACY; COMPUTER LANGUAGE; CONSENSUS; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH EDUCATOR; HUMAN; IDEOLOGY; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ONLINE SYSTEM; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT INFORMATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRIVACY; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SOCIAL NETWORK; WRITING; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; MEDICAL RECORD; STANDARD;

CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HUMANS; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED;

EID: 77955884360     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.01.006     Document Type: Review

References (97)

1. Impicciatore P., Pandolfini C., Casella N., Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ 1997, 314:1875-1881.
2. Eysenbach G., Diepgen T.L. Towards quality management of medical information on the internet: evaluation, labelling and filtering of information. BMJ 1998, 317:1496-1500.
3. Gottlieb S. Health information on the internet is often unreliable. BMJ 2000, 321:136.
4. Kiley R. Quackery on the Web. Health Information on the Internet 2000, June 9-10.
5. Eysenbach G. An ontology of quality initiatives and a model for decentralized, collaborative quality management on the (semantic) world wide web. J. Med. Int. Res. 2001, 3(4):e34. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2001/4/e34, last accessed: 20 January 2008.
6. Eysenbach G. Infodemiology: the epidemiology of (mis-)information. Am. J. Med. 2002, 113(9):763-765.
7. Kiley R. Some evidence exists that the internet does harm health. BMJ 2002, 324:238.
8. Meric F., Bernstam E.V., Mirza N.Q., Hunt K.K., Ames F.C., Ross M.I., Kuerer H.M., Pollock R.E., Musen M.A., Singletary S.E. Breast cancer on the world wide web: cross sectional survey of quality of information and popularity of websites. BMJ 2002, 324:577-581.
9. Bernstam E.V., Shelton D.M., Walji M., Meric-Bernstam F. Instruments to assess the quality of health information on the world wide web: what can our patients actually use?. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2005, 74(1):13-19.
10. Adams S.A. Under Construction: Reviewing and Producing Information Reliability on the Web [Dissertation] 2006, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
11. Abraham J., Reddy M. Quality of healthcare websites: a comparison of a general-purpose vs. domain-specific search engine. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007, 858.
12. Hsu W., Bath P.A. Development of a patient-oriented tool for evaluating the quality of breast cancer information on the internet. eHealth Beyond the Horizon-Get IT There, Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2008, vol. 136:297-302.
13. O'Grady L. Future directions for depicting credibility in health care web sites. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006, 75(1):58-65.
14. Kamel Boulos M.N., Maramba I., Wheeler S. Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education. BMC Med. Educ. 2006, 6(August):41.
15. Childs S. Editorial: blogging for health. Health Inform. Internet 2005, 45:1-2.
16. Goldman K.D., Schmalz K.J. Charlotte's web: why and how to create personal web sites and blogs. Health Promot. Pract. 2007, 8(1):13-15.
17. McIntosh S. Blogs: has their time finally come-or gone?. Global Media Commun. 2005, 1(5):385-388.
18. Oransky I. Cancer blogs. Lancet Oncol. 2005, 6(11):838-839.
19. McLean R., Richards B.H., Wardman J.I. The effect of Web 2.0 on the future of medical practice and education: darwikinian evolution or folksonomic revolution?. Med. J. Aust. 2007, 187(August (3)):174-177.
20. Tsai C., Tsai S.H., Zeng-Treitler Q., Liang B.A. Patient-centered consumer health social network websites: a pilot study of quality of user-generated health information. Proceedings of the Annual Symposium of the American Medical Informatics Association 2007, 1137.
21. Keen A. The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet is Killing Our Culture 2007, Doubleday, New York.
22. Adams S.A., de Bont A.A. More than just a mouse click: research into work practices behind the assignment of medical trust marks on the world wide web. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007, 76(Suppl. 1):s14-s20.
23. Adams S.A., de Bont A.A., Berg M. Looking for answers, constructing reliability: an exploration into how Dutch patients " check" web-based health information. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2006, 75(1):66-72.
24. Nettleton S., Burrows R., O'Malley L. The mundane realities of the everyday lay use of the internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. Sociol. Health Ill. 2005, 27(7):972-992.
25. Scopus [Database on the Internet], Elsevier Publishing (US), New York, NY, C2008, Available from: , last accessed: 27 October 2008. http://www.info.scopus.com/.
26. PubMed [Database on the Internet], National Library of Medicine (US), Bethesda, MD, Available from: , last accessed: 27 October 2008. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/.
27. Google Scholar [Database on the Internet], Google (US), Mountain View, CA, C2009, Available from: , last accessed: 27 October 2008. http://scholar.google.com/.
28. Alsever J., Durst S., Borzo J., Datta S. Health Care 2.0: Do-it-yourself Medical Services. Business 2. 0 Magazine 2006, Available from: http://money.cnn.com/2006/10/10/magazines/business2/health2.0_intro.biz2/index.htm, last accessed: 27 February 2007.
29. Health 2.0 Conference: User-generated Healthcare [Homepage on the Internet], Health 2.0 Conference, San Francisco, Available from: , last accessed: 8 September 2009. http://www.health2con.com/.
30. G. Eysenbach, Medicine 2.0 Congress Website Launched (and: Definition of Medicine 2.0/Health 2.0), Gunther Eysenbach's Random Research Rants (Blog), Available Online: , last accessed: 20 June 2008. http://gunther-eysenbach.blogspot.com/2008/03/medicine-20-congress-website-launched.html.
31. Houtekamer C. Blogs uit het lab [Dutch: Blogs from the lab] 2008, NRC Handelsblad [Dutch National Business Newspaper], January 19.
32. Herring S.C., Scheidt L.A., Bonus S., Wright E. Weblogs as bridging genre. Inform. Technol. People 2005, 18(2):142-171.
33. Scholz T. Market Ideology and the Myths of Web 2.0. First Monday 2008, 13(March 3). available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2138/1945, last accessed: 9 May 2008.
34. Allen M. Web 2.0: an argument against convergence. First Monday 2008, 13(March (3)). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2139/1946, last accessed: 9 May 2008.
35. Anderson P. What is Web 2.0? Ideas, Technologies and Implications for Education 2007, JISC Technology and Standards Watch, February.
36. Berners-Lee T. Podcast of Interview With IBM 2006, Transcript available from: http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206.txt, last accessed: 12 January 2009.
37. Silver D. History, hype and hope: an afterward. First Monday 2008, 13(March (3)). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2143/1950, last accessed: 9 May 2008.
38. T. O'Reilly, What is web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software [Homepage on the Internet] 2005 30 (September), available from: , last accessed: 2 April 2008. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html.
39. Witteman H., O'Grady L. E-health in the era of web 2.0. Proceedings of the Virtually Informed: The Internet as (new) Health Information Sources, Final Conference of the Project Virtually Informed-The Internet in the Medical Field 2008, 104-120.
40. Sarahson-Kahn J. The wisdom of patients: health care meets online social media. Report Prepared for the California Healthcare Foundation 2008.
41. Birnsteel L., Hoeksma J., Grätzel P. Web 2.0 in the Health Sector: Industry Review with UK Perspective 2008, E-health Media, London.
42. Karkalis G.I., Koutsouris D.D. E-health and the web 2.0. Proceedings of the ITAB 2006, Available from: http://medlab.cs.uoi.gr/itab2006/proceedings/eHealth/124.pdf, last accessed: 8 September 2009.
43. Giustini D. How web 2.0 is changing medicine. BMJ 2006, 333:1283-1284.
44. Kamel Boulos M.N., Wheeler S. The emerging web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. Health Inform. Libr. J. 2007, 24(1):2-23.
45. Blood R. How blogging software reshapes the online community. Commun. ACM 2004, 47(12):53-55.
46. Adams S.A. Using blogging tools to help individuals record their experiences: an exploration and review of two commercial web applications in the Netherlands. Information Technology in Health Care 2007, Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2007, 130:193-203.
47. Bruns A. Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life and Beyond: From Production to Produsage 2008, Peter Lang, New York.
48. Nardi B., Schiano D., Gumbrecht M., Swartz L. Why we blog. Commun. ACM 2004, 47(12):41-46.
49. Nardi B.A., Schiano D.J., Gumbrecht M. Blogging as a social activity, or, would you let 900 million people read your diary?. Proceedings of the ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work 6 (3) 2004, 222-231. ACM Press, New York.
50. MacDougall R. Identity, electronic ethos and blogs. Am. Behav. Sci. 2005, 49(December (4)):575-599.
51. Zimmer M. Preface: Critical Perspectives on Web 2.0. First Monday 2008, 13(March). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2137/1943, last accessed 12 January 2009.
52. Deshpande A., Jadad A.R. Web 2.0: could it help move the health system into the 21st century?. JMHG 2006, 3(December (4)):332-336.
53. Hargittai E. The changing online landscape: from free-for-all to commercial gatekeeping. Community Practice in the Network Society: Local Actions/Global Interaction 2004, 66-76. Routledge, New York. P. Day, D. Schuler (Eds.).
54. Henwood F., Wyatt S., Hart A., Smith J. " Ignorance is bliss sometimes": constraints on the emergence of the " informed patient" in the changing landscapes of health information. Sociol. Health Ill. 2003, 25(6):589-607.
55. Eysenbach G. Credibility of health information and digital media: new perspectives and implications for youth. Digital Media, Youth, and Credibility 2008, 123-154. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M.J. Metzger, A.J. Flanagin (Eds.).
56. S.A. Adams, Blog-based applications and health information: two case studies that illustrate important questions for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) research, Int. J. Med. Inform., doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2008.06.009.
57. Zimmer M. The externalities of search 2.0: The emerging privacy threats when the drive for the perfect search engine meets web 2.0. First Monday 2008, 13(March). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2136/1944, last accessed: 9 May 2008.
58. Goetz T. Practicing Patients 2008, The New York Times, Available from: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/23/magazine/23patients-t.html, last accessed: 23 March 2008.
59. Zimmer M. The Faustian Bargain with web 2.0. First Monday Podcast [Monthly Online Audio Program] 2008 April, Transcript Available from: http://www.firstmondaypodcast.org/transcripts/transcript_apr08.htm, last accessed: 12 January 2009.
60. Albrechtslund A. Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday 2008, 13(March). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949, last accessed: 9 May 2008.
61. Hart K. The rise of alter egos in everybody's space: after oversharing, users recast their online personas. Washington Post 2008, (May). D01.
62. EurActiv.com [homepage on the internet], Web 2.0: New Opportunities, New Risks, 2008 April 17, Available from: , last accessed: 9 June 2008. http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/web-20-new-opportunities-new-risks/article-171600.
63. Cormode C., Krishnamurthy R. Key Differences Between web 1.0 and web 2.0. First Monday 2008, 13(June). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2125/1972, last accessed: 6 August 2008.
64. David S., Pinch T. Six degrees of reputation: the use and abuse of online review and recommendation systems. First Monday 2006, 11(March). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/1315/1235, last accessed: 9 June 2008.
65. Frost J.H., Massagli M.P. Social uses of personal health information within PatientsLikeMe, an online patient community: what can happen when patients have access to one another's data. J. Med. Int. Res. 2008, 10(3):e15. Available from: http://www.jmir.org/2008/3/e15, last accessed: 6 August 2008.
66. Wang Y., Liu Z. Automatic detecting indicators for quality of health information on the Web. Int. J. Med. Inf. 2007, 76(8):575-582.
67. Zegelgezond [Internet], Dutch, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, Mediavedi B.V., available from: , last accessed: 8 September 2009. http://www.zegelgezond.nl/.
68. Deshpande A., Jadad A. Trying to measure the quality of health information on the internet: is it time to move on?. J. Rheumatol. 2009, 36(1):1-3.
69. Eysenbach G. Medicine 2.0: social networking, collaboration, participation, apomediation and openness. J. Med. Internet Res. 2008, 10(August (3)):e22.
70. G. Eysenbach, [Weblog] Available from: , last accessed: 6 March 2008. http://gunther-eysenbach.blogspot.com/.
71. Jadad A.R. Promoting partnerships: challenges for the internet age. BMJ 1999, 319(7212):761-764.
72. Rigby M., Forsstrom J., Roberts R., Wyatt J. Verifying quality and safety in health informatics services. BMJ 2001, 323(7312):552-556.
73. Fogg B.J., Soohoo C., Danielsen D., Marable L., Stanford J., Tauber E.R. How do people evaluate a web site's credibility? Results from a large study. Report from the Stanford University Persuasive Technology Lab, Consumer Web Watch, and Sliced Bread Design 2002, October.
74. Stanford J., Tauber E.R., Fogg B.J., Marable L. Experts versus online consumers: a comparative credibility study of health and finance websites. Report from Sliced Bread Design, the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab and Consumer Web Watch 2002, October.
75. Peterson G., Aslani P., Williams K.A. How do consumers search for and appraise information on medicines on the internet? A qualitative study using focus groups. J. Med. Internet Res. 2003, 5(4):e33. Available online: last accessed: 2 January 2005.
76. Health on the Net website [Internet] The HONcode in Brief 2009, Health on the Net, Geneva, Switzerland, http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/Webmasters/Conduct.html, last accessed: 11 September 2009.
77. Petersen S.M. Loser generated content: from participation to exploitation. First Monday 2008, 13(March). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2141/1948, last accessed: 9 May 2008.
78. Genes N. Diabetes patient offers goldmine of information and support. Medscape Med. Stud. 2006, 8. Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/544166, last accessed: 27 November 2006.
79. Thorsen E. Journalistic objectivity redefined? Wikinews and the neutral point of view. New Media Soc. 2008, 10:935-954.
80. B. Aichinger, [Weblog] Available from: , last accessed: 6 March 2008. http://ehealthaustria.blogspot.com/.
81. Berendt B., Navigli N. Finding your way through blogspace: using semantics for cross-domain blog analysis. AAAI Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analyzing Weblogs 2006, Available from: http://www.dsi.uniroma1.it/navigli/pubs/SSS_2006_Berendt_Navigli.pdf, last accessed: 12 January 2009.
82. Bhatt J. Blogging as a tool: innovative approaches to information access. Library Hi Tech News 2005, 9:28-31.
83. Chesanow N. Doctors and " blogs." Med. Econ. 2004, 81(August):33.
84. Fujiki T., Nanno T., Okumura M. Differences between blogs and web diaries. Proceedings of the WWW2005 2005.
85. Herring S.C., Scheidt L.A., Bonus S., Wright E. Bridging the gap: a genre analysis of weblogs, Bridging the gap: a genre analysis of weblogs. Proceedings of the 37th Hawai'i International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-37) 2005, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, Available from: http://www.blogninja.com/DDGDD04.doc, last accessed: 8 September 2009.
86. D. Hinchcliffe, [Weblog] Web 2.0 Blog, C2005-2008, Hinchcliffe and Company, Alexandria, VA, Available from: , last accessed: 12 January 2009. http://web2.socialcomputingmagazine.com/.
87. Hughes B., Joshi I., Wareham J. Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: tensions and controversies in the field. J. Med. Int. Res. 2008, 10(3):e23.
88. Jarrett K. Interactivity is evil! A critical investigation of web 2.0. First Monday 2008, 13(March). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2140/1947, last accessed: 15 April 2008.
89. B. Klepper, J. Sarasohn-Kahn, A Broad Vision of Health 2.0: Reformulating Data for Transparency, Decision Support & Revitalized Health Care Markets [White Paper Posted on a Wiki], Available from: , last accessed: 12 January 2009. http://health20.org/wiki%3Ftitle=Klepper-Kahn_Health_2.0_Whitepaper%26printable=yes.
90. Baoill A.R. Conceptualizing the weblog: Understanding what it is in order to understand what it may be interfacings. J. Contemp. Media Stud. 2004, Available from: http://www.comm.uiuc.edu/icr/interfacings, last accessed: 26 November 2006.
91. Pomerantz J., Stutzman F. Collaborative reference work in the blogosphere. Ref. Serv. Rev. 2006, 34(2):200-212.
92. Rainie L. The State of Blogging, Pew Internet and American Life Data Memo 2005, Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org, last accessed: 12 January 2009.
93. Ramos M., Piper P.S. Letting the grass grow: grassroots information on blogs and wikis. Ref. Serv. Rev. 2006, 34(4):570-574.
94. J.W. Sharp, [Weblog] Available from: , last accessed: 27 March 2008. http://ehealth.johnwsharp.com/.
95. A. Albrechtslund, [Weblog] Available from: , last accessed: 26 June 2007. http://www.albrechtslund.net/.
96. Health 2.0 Wiki Main Page [Internet], Available from: , last accessed 12 December 2008. http://www.health20.org/wiki/Main_Page.
97. Wichowski A. Survival of the fittest tag: folksonomies, findability, and the evolution of information organization. First Monday 2009, 14(May). Available from: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2447/2175, last accessed: 10 September 2009.