Dynamical probing of allosteric control in nuclear receptors

Journal of Molecular Modeling

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 3147-3152

  Cunningham, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS PAN AMERICAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamics; LXR RXR; Molecular; Nuclear receptor

Indexed keywords

ARGININE; ASPARTIC ACID; CARBON; GLUTAMIC ACID; LIVER X RECEPTOR; LYSINE; MONOMER; PROLINE; RETINOIC ACID RECEPTOR;

ALLOSTERISM; ARTICLE; ATOM; BINDING SITE; CRYSTALLIZATION; HYDROGEN BOND; HYDROPHOBICITY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SIMULATION;

ALLOSTERIC REGULATION; LIGANDS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; ORPHAN NUCLEAR RECEPTORS; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN MULTIMERIZATION; RECEPTORS, CYTOPLASMIC AND NUCLEAR; RETINOID X RECEPTORS;

EID: 84864698047     PISSN: 16102940     EISSN: 09485023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-011-1330-y     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG (1995) A smooth particle mesh ewald method. J Chem Phys 103(19):8577-8593, doi: 10.1063/1.470117, URL http://link.aip. org/link/?JCP/103/8577/1
2. Feller SE, Zhang Y, Pastor RW, Brooks BR (1995) Constant pressure molecular dynamics simulation: The langevin piston method. The Journal of Chemical Physics 103(11):4613-4621, doi: 10.1063/1.470648, http://link.aip.org/ link/?JCP/103/4613/1
3. Hoover WG (1985) Canonical dynamics: equilibrium phasespace distributions. Phys Rev A 31(3):1695-1697. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695
4. Hoover WG (1986) Constant-pressure equations of motion. Phys Rev A 34(3):2499-2500. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.34.2499
5. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD-Visual Molecular Dynamics. J Mol Graphics 14:33-38
6. Kalé L, Skeel R, Bhandarkar M, Brunner R, Gursoy A, Krawetz N, Phillips J, Shinozaki A, Varadarajan K, Schulten K (2002) NAMD 2: Greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics. J Comput Phys 9:646-652
7. MacKerell AD Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Evanseck RL DJJ, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph D, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE III, Roux B, Schlenkrich M, Smith J, Stote R, Straub J, Watanabe M, Wiorkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of protein. J Phys Chem B 102:3586-3616
8. Mangelsdorf DJ, Thummel C, Beato M, Herrlich P, Schtz G, Umesono K, Blumberg B, Kastner P, Mark M, Chambon P, Evans RM (1995) The nuclear receptor superfamily: The second decade. Cell 83(6):835-839. doi:DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674 (95) 90199-X, URL
9. McEwan IJ (2009) Nuclear receptors: One big family. In: McEwan IJ, Walker JM (eds) The nuclear receptor superfamily. Methods in molecular biology, vol 505, Humana Press, pp 3-18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-575-0 doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-575-0-1
10. Nettles KW, Greene GL (2005) Ligand control of coregulator recruitment to nuclear receptors. Annu Rev Physiol 67(1):309-333, doi:10.1146/annurev. physiol.66.032802.154710, http://www.annual reviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev. physiol.66.032802.154710, http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/pdf/10.1146/annurev. physiol.66.032802.154710
11. Nettles KW, Sun J, Radek JT, Sheng S, Rodriguez AL, Katzenellenbogen JA, Katzenellenbogen BS, Greene GL (2004) Allosteric control of ligand selectivity between estrogen receptors [alpha] and [beta]: Implications for other nuclear receptors. Mol Cell 13(3):317-327, doi:10.1016/S1097-2765 (04) 00054-1, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1097276504000541
12. Oosterveer MH, Grefhorst A, Groen AK, Kuipers F (2010) The liver x receptor. Control of cellular lipid homeostasis and beyond: implications for drug design. Prog Lipid Res 49(4):343-352, doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2010.03.002, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163782710000172
13. Repa JJ, Turley SD, Lobaccaro JMA, Medina J, Li L, Lustig K, Shan B, Heyman RA, Dietschy JM, Mangelsdorf DJ (2000) Regulation of absorption and abc1-mediated efflux of cholesterol by rxr heterodimers. Science 289(5484):1524-1529, doi:10.1126/science.289.5484.1524, http://www.sciencemag. org/content/289/5484/1524. abstract, http://www.sciencemag.org/content/289/5484/ 1524.full.pdf
14. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23(3):327-341, doi:10.1016/0021-9991 (77) 90098-5, http://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/0021999177900985
15. Yue L, Ye F, Gui C, Luo H, Cai J, Shen J, Chen K, Shen X, Jiang H (2005) Ligand-binding regulation of lxr/rxr and lxr/ppar heterodimerizations: Spr technology-based kinetic analysis correlated with molecular dynamics simulation. Protein Sci 14(3):812-822, doi:10.1110/ps.04951405, http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ ps.04951405
16. Zelcer N, Hong C, Boyadjian R, Tontonoz P (2009) Lxr regulates cholesterol uptake through idol-dependent ubiquitination of the ldl receptor. Science 325(5936):100-104, doi:10.1126/science.1168974, http://www.sciencemag. org/content/325/5936/100. abstract, http://www.sciencemag.org/content/325/5936/ 100. full.pdf