Goal-oriented visualizations of activity tracking: A case study with engineering students

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 143-152

  Santos, Jose Luis ^a   Govaerts, Sten ^a   Verbert, Katrien ^a   Duval, Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

learning analytics; reflection; visualization

Indexed keywords

DESIGN-BASED RESEARCH; EVALUATION RESULTS; GOAL-ORIENTED; LEARNING ANALYTICS; LEARNING PROCESS; SELF REFLECTION;

FLOW VISUALIZATION; REFLECTION; STUDENTS; VISUALIZATION;

RESEARCH;

EID: 84864689444     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2330601.2330639     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (43)

1. Health engage - http://www.healthengage.com/ - last checked on october 2011.
2. Health tracking - http://www.healthtracking.net/ - last checked on october 2011.
3. Rescuetime - http://www.rescuetime.com - last checked on october 2011.
4. Run keeper - http://runkeeper.com/ - last checked on october 2011.
5. D. Albert and A. Nussbaumer. Towards generic visualisation tools and techniques for adaptive e-learning. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education ICCE 2010, 2010.
6. S. D. Aneesha Bakharia1. Snapp: A bird's-eye view of temporal participant interaction. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
7. A. Bangor, P. Kortum, and J. Miller. An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(6):574-594, 2008.
8. C. Bingham. Two educational ideas for 2011 and beyond. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30:513-519, 2011. 10.1007/s11217-011-9253-8.
9. P. Blikstein. Using learning analytics to assess students' behavior in open-ended programming tasks. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
10. J. Brooke. Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, dustry:189-194, 1996.
11. F. D. Davis and V. Venkatesh. Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: implications for software project management. Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 51(1):31-46, 2004.
12. E. Duval. Attention please! Learning analytics for visualization and recommendation. In Proceedings of LAK11: 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge,. ACM, 2011. Accepted.
13. S. E. Fancsali. Variable construction for predictive and causal modeling of online education data. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
14. S. Govaerts, K. Verbert, D. Dahrendorf, C. Ullrich, S. Manuel, M. Werkle, A. Chatterjee, A. Nussbaumer, D. Renzel, M. Sche ffel, and et al. Towards Responsive Open Learning Environments : the ROLE Interoperability Framework. CEUR workshop proceedings, 2011.
15. S. Govaerts, K. Verbert, J. Klerkx, and E. Duval. Visualizing activities for self-reflection and awareness. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 91-100. Springer, Dec. 2010.
16. N. Kamal, S. Fels, and K. Ho. Online social networks for personal informatics to promote positive health behavior. In Proceedings of second ACM SIGMM workshop on Social media, WSM '10, pages 47-52, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
17. G. M. Karam. Visualization using timelines. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM SIGSOFT international symposium on Software testing and analysis, ISSTA '94, pages 125-137, New York, NY, USA, 1994. ACM.
18. J. Kay, J. Kay, N. Maisonneuve, N. Maisonneuve, K. Yacef, K. Yacef, P. Reimann, and P. Reimann. The big five and visualisations of team work activity. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 2006.
19. C. Lewis and J. Rieman. Task-centered user interface design: a practical introduction. University of Colorado, Boulder, Dept. of Computer Science, 1993.
20. I. Li, A. Dey, and J. Forlizzi. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '10, pages 557-566, New York, NY, USA, 2010. ACM.
21. L. Lockyer and S. Dawson. Learning designs and learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
22. A. M. Lund. Measuring usability with the use questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 2001.
23. R. Mazza and C. MILANI. Exploring usage analysis in learning systems: Gaining insights from visualisations. In In AIED Workshops (AIED'05), juillet, 2005.
24. L. Mazzola and R. Mazza. Gvis: a facility for adaptively mashing up and representing open learner models. In Proceedings of the 5th European conference on Technology enhanced learning conference on Sustaining TEL: from innovation to learning and practice, EC-TEL'10, pages 554-559, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010. Springer-Verlag.
25. K. Niemann, H.-C. Schmitz, M. Scheffel, and M. Wolpers. Usage contexts for object similarity: Exploratory investigations. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
26. A. Nussbaumer. Supporting Self-Reflection through Presenting Visual Feedback of Adaptive Assessment and Self-Evaluation Tools, volume 1. 2008.
27. A. Nussbaumer, C. Steiner, and D. Albert. Visualisation Tools for Supporting Self-Regulated Learning through Exploiting Competence Structures, pages 3-5. Number September. Citeseer, 2008.
28. C. H. Orrill, M. J. Hannafin, and E. M. Glazer. Disciplined inquiry and the study of emerging technology. Framework, pages 335-354, 1998.
29. A. Pardo and C. D. Kloos. Stepping out of the box. towards analytics outside the learning management system. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
30. P. R. Pintrich. A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol 95(4):667-686, December 2003.
31. S. Purpura, V. Schwanda, K. Williams, W. Stubler, and P. Sengers. Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. In Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, CHI '11, pages 423-432, New York, NY, USA, 2011. ACM.
32. G. Richards and I. DeVries. Revisiting formative evaluation: Dynamic monitoring for the improvement of learning activity design and delivery. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
33. D. Rosen, V. Miagkikh, and D. Suthers. Social and semantic network analysis of chat logs. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
34. J. L. Santos, K. Verbert, S. Govaerts, and E. Duval. Visualizing PLE Usage, volume 773, pages 34-38. CEUR workshop proceedings, 2011.
35. M. Sedlmair, P. Isenberg, D. Baur, M. Mauerer, C. Pigorsch, and A. Butz. Cardiogram: visual analytics for automotive engineers. In CHI '11, pages 1727-1736. ACM, 2011.
36. T. Selker. New paradigms for using computers. Commun. ACM, 39:60-69, August 1996.
37. M. Sharkey. Academic analytics landscape at the university of phoenix. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
38. B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proc. of the IEEE Symp. on Visual Languages, page 336. IEEE, 1996.
39. M. Swan. Emerging patient-driven health care models: An examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(2):492-525, 2009.
40. M. Tarafdar, Q. Tu, B. S. Ragu-Nathan, and T. S. Ragu-Nathan. The impact of technostress on role stress and productivity. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(1):301-328, 2007.
41. K. Upton and J. Kay. Narcissus: Group and individual models to support small group work. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization: formerly UM and AH, UMAP '09, pages 54-65, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer-Verlag.
42. K. Verbert, H. Drachsler, N. Manouselis, M. Wolpers, R. Vuorikari, and E. Duval. Dataset-driven research for improving recommender systems for learning. In Proceedings of the Learning Analytics and Knowledge conferencd (LAK11), 2011.
43. F. Wang and M. Hannafin. Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53:5-23, 2005. 10.1007/BF02504682.