Intermediate clinical outcome of bryan cervical disc replacement for degenerative disk disease and its effect on adjacent segment disks

Orthopedics

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2012, Pages

  Ding, Chen ^a   Hong, Ying ^a   Liu, Hao ^a   Shi, Rui ^a   Hu, Tao ^a   Li, Tao ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM WEAKNESS; ARTICLE; CERVICAL DEGENERATIVE DISK DISEASE; CERVICAL DISK REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHAGIA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; RADICULAR PAIN; RANGE OF MOTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE SURGERY; THROAT DISEASE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; BACK PAIN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TOTAL DISC REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84864685242     PISSN: 01477447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120525-33     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Smith GW, Robinson RA. The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958; 40(3):607-624.
2. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, et al. Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993; 75(9):1298-1307. (Pubitemid 23331227)
3. Heidecke V, Rainov NG, Burkert W. Anterior cervical fusion with the Orion locking plate system. Spine. 1998; 23(16):1796-1802.
4. Caspar W, Geisler FH, Pitzen T, Johnson TA. Anterior cervical plate stabilization in one- and two-level degenerative disease: overtreatment or benefit? J Spinal Disord. 1998; 11(1):1-11. (Pubitemid 28106286)
5. Fuller DA, Kirkpatrick JS, Emery SE, Wilber RG, Davy DT. A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 23(15):1649-1656.
6. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002; 27(22):2431-2434.
7. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004; 17(2):79-85.
8. Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005; 3(6):417-423.
9. Baba H, Furusawa N, Imura S, Kawahara N, Tsuchiya H, Tomita K. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(15):2167-2173.
10. Ishihara H, Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Nakamura H, Kimura T. Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J. 2004; 4(6):624-628. (Pubitemid 39497281)
11. Summers BN, Eisenstein SM. Donor site pain from the ilium. A complication of lumbar spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989; 71(4):677-680. (Pubitemid 19211233)
12. Brown CA, Eismont FJ. Complications in spinal fusion. Orthop Clin North Am. 1998; 29(4):679-699. (Pubitemid 28501132)
13. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, Sell G, Vigna F, McAfee PC. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(10):1165-1172.
14. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51(3):840-847. (Pubitemid 36331083)
15. Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R, et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the Prodisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease [published online ahead of print September 6, 2008]. Spine J. 2009; 9(4):275-286.
16. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(2):101-107.
17. Walraevens J, Liu B, Meersschaert J, et al. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs and facet joints [published online ahead of print November 13, 2008]. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(3):358-369.
18. Rihn JA, Lawrence J, GaRihn JA, et al. Adjacent segment disease after cervical spine fusion. Instr Course Lect. 2009; 58:747-756.
19. Schwab JS, Diangelo DJ, Foley KT. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(21):2439-2448.
20. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J. 2001; 10(4):320-324. (Pubitemid 32762777)
21. Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, Jones PK, Bohlman HH. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(4):519-528. (Pubitemid 29211592)
22. Garrido BJ, Taha TA, Sasso RC. Clinical outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site trial with 48-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010; 23(6):367-371.
23. Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Lipscomb B. A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010; 12(3):261-269.
24. Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA. Motion analysis of bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008; 21(6):393-399.
25. Kelly MP, Mok JM, Frisch RF, et al. Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus ProDisc-c cervical total disk arthroplasty: analysis from a randomized, controlled trial. Spine. 2011; 36(15):1171-1179.
26. Tian W, Han X, Liu B, et al. Clinical and radiographic results of cervical artificial disc arthroplasty: over three years follow-up cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2010; 123(21):2969-2973.
27. Kim SW, Limson MA, Kim SB, et al. Comparison of radiographic changes after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases [published online ahead of print January 6, 2009]. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(2):218-231.
28. Walraevens J, Demaerel P, Suetens P, et al. Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the Bryan cervical disc. Neurosurgery. 2010; 67(3):679-687.
29. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2005; 57(4):759-763.
30. Lee JH, Jung TG, Kim HS, Jang JS, Lee SH. Analysis of the incidence and clinical effect of the heterotopic ossification in a single-level cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine J. 2010; 10(8):676-682.