Adjacent segment motion after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus prodisc-C cervical total disk arthroplasty: Analysis from a randomized, controlled trial

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 15, 2011, Pages 1171-1179

  Kelly, Michael P ^a   Mok, James M ^b   Frisch, Richard F ^c   Tay, Bobby K ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MADIGAN ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c OCHSNER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

adjacent segment motion; adjacent segment ROM; pseudoarthrosis; radiculopathy; radiographs; total disc arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADJACENT SEGMENT MOTION; ADULT; ANTERIOR CERVICAL DISCECTOMY AND FUSION; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CERVICAL TOTAL DISC ARTHROPLASTY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISEASE; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; KINEMATICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POST HOC ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADICULOPATHY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RANK SUM TEST; SPINAL CORD DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPINE SURGERY; SYMPTOMATIC CERVICAL DISC DISEASE; WILCOXON SIGNED RANKS TEST;

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC; INTERVERTEBRAL DISC DEGENERATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SPINAL DISEASES; SPINAL FUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79959818559     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5c7d     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rao RD , Currier BL , Albert TJ , et al. Degenerative cervical spondylosis: Clinical syndromes, pathogenesis, and management J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 ; 89 : 1360-78 (Pubitemid 46898009)
2. Gore DR , Sepic SB Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients Spine 1984 ; 9 : 667-71 (Pubitemid 15190612)
3. Palit M , Schofferman J , Goldthwaite N , et al. Anterior discectomy and fusion for the management of neck pain Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 ; 24 : 2224-8 (Pubitemid 29518026)
4. Samartzis D , Shen FH , Goldberg EJ , et al. Is autograft the gold standard in achieving radiographic fusion in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with rigid anterior plate fixation? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 ; 30 : 1756-61 (Pubitemid 41099490)
5. Goffi n J , Geusens E , Vantomme N , et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine J Spinal Disord Tech 2004 ; 17 : 79-85
6. Hilibrand AS , Carlson GD , Palumbo MA , et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999 ; 81 : 519-28 (Pubitemid 29211592)
7. Matsunaga S , Kabayama S , Yamamoto T , et al. Strain on intervertebral discs after anterior cervical decompression and fusion Spine 1999 ; 24 : 670-5 (Pubitemid 29162910)
8. Dmitriev AE , Cunningham BW , Hu N , et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: An in vitro human cadaveric model Spine 2005 ; 30 : 1165-72 (Pubitemid 40695927)
9. Gore DR , Sepic SB Anterior discectomy and fusion for painful cervical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years Spine 1998 ; 23 : 2047-51 (Pubitemid 28485117)
10. Puttlitz CM , Rousseau MA , Xu Z , et al. Intervertebral disc replacement maintains cervical spine kinetics Spine 2004 ; 29 : 2809-14
11. Heller JG , Sasso RC , Papadopoulos SM , et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: Clinical and radiographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial Spine 2009 ; 34 : 101-7
12. Mummaneni PV , Burkus JK , Haid RW , et al. Clinical and radiographic analysis of cervical disc arthroplasty compared with allograft fusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial J Neurosurg Spine 2007 ; 6 : 198-209 (Pubitemid 47066071)
13. Murrey D , Janssen M , Delamarter R , et al. Results of the prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-C total disc replacement versus anterior discectomy and fusion for the treatment of 1-level symptomatic cervical disc disease Spine J 2009 ; 9 : 275-86
14. Reitman CA , Hipp JA , Nguyen L , et al. Changes in segmental intervertebral motion adjacent to cervical arthrodesis: A prospective study Spine 2004 ; 29 : E221-6
15. Levine M , Ensom MH Post hoc power analysis: An idea whose time has passed? Pharmacotherapy 2001 ; 21 : 405-9 (Pubitemid 32275267)
16. Eck JC , Humphreys SC , Lim TH , et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion Spine 2002 ; 27 : 2431-4 (Pubitemid 35346149)
17. Fuller DA , Kirkpatrick JS , Emery SE , et al. A kinematic study of the cervical spine before and after segmental arthrodesis Spine 1998 ; 23 : 1649-56 (Pubitemid 28433863)
18. Schwab JS , Diangelo DJ , Foley KT Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: Where does the lost motion go? Spine 2006 ; 31 : 2439-48 (Pubitemid 44527026)
19. Kolstad F , Nygaard OP , Leivseth G Segmental motion adjacent to anterior cervical arthrodesis: A prospective study Spine 2007 ; 32 : 512-7 (Pubitemid 46398916)
20. Elsawaf A , Mastronardi L , Roperto R , et al. Effect of cervical dynamics on adjacent segment degeneration after anterior cervical fusion with cages Neurosurg Rev 2009 ; 32 : 215-24
21. Hutton WC , Toribatake Y , Elmer WA , et al. The effect of compressive force applied to the intervertebral disc in vivo. A study of proteoglycans and collagen Spine 1998 ; 23 : 2524-37 (Pubitemid 29003526)
22. Sasso RC , Best NM Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty J Spinal Disord Tech 2008 ; 21 : 19-22
23. Kim SW , Limson MA , Kim SB , et al. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases Eur Spine J 2009 ; 18 : 218-31
24. Wigfield C , Gill S , Nelson R , et al. Infl uence of an artifi cial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease J Neurosurg 2002 ; 96 : 17-21 (Pubitemid 34226534)
25. Robertson JT , Papadopoulos SM , Traynelis VC Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: A prospective 2-year study J Neurosurg Spine 2005 ; 3 : 417-23
26. Sears WR , Sekhon LH , Duggal N , et al. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis-does it occur? J Spinal Disord Tech 2007 ; 20 : 1-6 (Pubitemid 46220317)
27. Sears WR , Duggal N , Sekhon LH , et al. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis-contributing factors J Spinal Disord Tech 2007 ; 20 : 111-7 (Pubitemid 46588320)
28. Anakwenze OA , Auerbach JD , Milby AH , et al. Sagittal cervical alignment after cervical disc arthroplasty and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Results of a prospective, randomized, controlled trial Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 ; 34 : 2001-7
29. Katsuura A , Hukuda S , Saruhashi Y , et al. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels Eur Spine J 2001 ; 10 : 320-4 (Pubitemid 32762777)