Longitudinal prospective long-term radiographic follow-up after treatment of single-level cervical disk disease with the bryan cervical disc

Neurosurgery

Volumn 67, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 679-687

  Walraevens, Joris ^a   Demaerel, Philippe ^a   Suetens, Paul ^a   Van Calenbergh, Frank ^b   Van Loon, Johan ^b   Sloten, Jozef Vander ^b   Goffin, Jan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Adjacent level disk degeneration; Arthroplasty; Bryan Cervical Disc; Cervical; Long term Followup; Radiology

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CERVICAL SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DEGENERATION; INTERVERTEBRAL DISKECTOMY; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROSTHESIS; RANGE OF MOTION; REOPERATION; SCORING SYSTEM; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; DISKECTOMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK DISPLACEMENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION;

EID: 77956192225     PISSN: 0148396X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000377039.89725.F3     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Coric D, Finger F, Boltes P. Prospective randomized controlled study of the Bryan Cervical Disc: early clinical results from a single investigational site. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(1):31-35.
2. Duggal N, Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Keller JL. Early clinical and biomechanical results following cervical arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;17(3):E9.
3. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery. 2002;51(3):840-847.
4. Goffin J, Calenbergh F V, van Loon J, et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine. 2003;28(24):2673-2678.
5. Heidecke V, Burkert W, Brucke M, Rainov NG. Intervertebral disc replacement for cervical degenerative disease-clinical results and functional outcome at two years in patients implanted with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150(5):453-459. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1007/s00701-008-1552-7.
6. Heller JG, Sasso RC, Papadopoulos SM, et al. Comparison of BRYAN cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical decompression and fusion: clinical and radi-ographic results of a randomized, controlled, clinical trial. Spine. 2009;34(2):101-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818ee263.
7. Sasso RC, Smucker JD, Hacker RJ, Heller JG. Artificial disc versus fusion: a prospective, randomized study with 2-year follow-up on 99 patients. Spine. 2007;32:2932-2933. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815d0034.
8. Sasso R, Smucker J, Hacker R, Heller J. Clinical Outcomes of BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter trial with 24-month follow-up. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007;20(7):481-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180310534.
9. Shim CS, Lee S, Park H, Kang H, Hwang J. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(7):465-470.
10. Yang S, Wu X, Hu Y, et al. Early and intermediate follow-up results after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-and multiple-level. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008;33(12):E371-E377. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817343a6.
11. Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, Kim SH. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006;148(9):943-950. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00701-006-0805-6.
12. Pickett GE, Rouleau J P, Duggal N. Kinematic analysis of the cervical spine following implantation of an artificial cervical disc. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(17):1949-1954.
13. Sasso RC, Best NM, Metcalf NH, Anderson PA. Motion analysis of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior discectomy and fusion: results from a prospective, randomized, multicenter, clinical trial. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008;21(6):393-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318150d121.
14. Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N, et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2004;17(2):79-85.
15. Robertson JT, Papadopoulos SM, Traynelis VC. Assessment of adjacent-segment disease in patients treated with cervical fusion or arthroplasty: a prospective 2-year study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3(6):417-423.
16. Bartels RH, Donk R. Fusion around cervical disc prosthesis: case report. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(1):E194.
17. Beaurain J, Bernard P, Dufour T, et al. Intermediate clinical and radiological results of cervical TDR (Mobi-C) with up to 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(6):841-850. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1017-6.
18. Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J, et al. Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(4):759-763.
19. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F, et al. Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(24):2802-2806. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000245852.70594.d5.
20. Lafuente J, Casey AT, Petzold A, Brew S. The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of cervical spondylosis: 46 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(4):508-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B4.15436.
21. Lind B, Zoëga B, Anderson PA. A radiostereometric analysis of the Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis. Spine. 2007;32(8):885-890. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1097/01.brs.0000259925.11230.dd.
22. Wenger M, van Hoonacker P, Zachee B, Lange R, Markwalder T. Bryan cervical disc prostheses: preservation of function over time. J Clin Neurosci. 2009;16(2):220-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.01.021.
23. Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N. Complications with cervical arthro-plasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006;4(2):98-105.
24. Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Lipscomb B. A clinical analysis of 4-and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2010;12(3):261-269.
25. Walraevens J, Liu B, Meerschaert J, et al. Qualitative and quantitative assessment of degeneration of cervical intervertebral discs and facet joints. Eur Spine J. 2009; 18(3):358-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0820-9.
26. McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Devine J, Williams E, Yu-Yahiro J. Classification of heterotopic ossification (HO) in artificial disk replacement. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(4):384-389.
27. Odom G. Cervical disc lesions. JAMA. 1958;166:23-28.
28. Frobin W, Leivseth G, Biggemann M, Brinckmann P. Sagittal plane segmental motion of the cervical spine: a new precision measurement protocol and normal motion data of healthy adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2002;17(1):21-31.
29. Piché M, Benoît P, Lambert J, et al. Development of a computerized interverte-bral motion analysis of the cervical spine for clinical application. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2007;30(1):38-43. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.11.004.
30. Reitman CA, Mauro KM, Nguyen L, Ziegler JM, Hipp JA. Intervertebral motion between flexion and extension in asymptomatic individuals. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29(24):2832-2843.
31. Kim S W, Limson MA, Kim S, et al. Comparison of radiographic changes after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(2):218-231. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0854-z.
32. Rabin D, Pickett GE, Bisnaire L, Duggal N. The kinematics of anterior cervical dis-cectomy and fusion versus artificial cervical disc: a pilot study. Neurosurgery. 2007;61(3)(suppl):100-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1227/01.neu. 0000289722.12459.9e.
33. Cheng JS, Liu F, Komistek RD, et al. Comparison of cervical spine kinematics using a fluoroscopic model for adjacent segment degeneration: invited submission from the Joint Section on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2007. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7(5):509-513.
34. DiAngelo DJ, Roberston J T, Metcalf NH, McVay BJ, Davis RC. Biomechanical testing of an artificial cervical joint and an anterior cervical plate. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16(4):314-323.
35. Dmitriev AE, Cunningham BW, Hu N, et al. Adjacent level intradiscal pressure and segmental kinematics following a cervical total disc arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(10):1165-1172.
36. Liu F, Cheng J, Komistek RD, Mahfouz MR, Sharma A. In vivo evaluation of dynamic characteristics of the normal, fused, and disc replacement cervical spines. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007;32(23):2578-2584. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ BRS.0b013e318158cdf8.
37. Ragab AA, Escarcega AJ, Zdeblick TA. A quantitative analysis of strain at adjacent segments after segmental immobilization of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006;19(6):407-410.
38. Schwab JS, Diangelo DJ, Foley KT. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31(21):2439-2448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000239125.54761. 23.
39. Wigfield C, Gill S, Nelson R, et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg. 2002;96(1)(suppl):17-21.
40. Hilibrand AS, Robbins M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 2004;4(6)(suppl):190S\194S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.07.007.
41. Gore DR. Roentgenographic findings in the cervical spine in asymptomatic persons: a ten-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001;26(22):2463-2466.
42. Parkinson J F, Sekhon LH. Cervical arthroplasty complicated by delayed spontaneous fusion: case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2(3):377-380.
43. Banovac K, Sherman AL, Estores IM, Banovac F. Prevention and treatment of het-erotopic ossification after spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2004;27(4):376-382.
44. Fijn R, Koorevaar RT, Brouwers JR. Prevention of heterotopic ossification after total hip replacement with NSAIDs. Pharm World Sci. 2003;25(4):138-145.
45. Fransen M, Neal B. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for preventing hetero-topic bone formation after hip arthroplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004: CD001160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001160.pub2.
46. van Kuijk AA, Geurts AC, van Kuppevelt HJ. Neurogenic heterotopic ossification in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2002;40(7):313-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3101309.