Clinical and Radiographic Results Of Cervical Artificial Disc Arthroplasty: Over Three Years Follow-Up Cohort Study

Chinese Medical Journal

Volumn 123, Issue 21, 2010, Pages 2969-2973

  Tian, Wei ^a   Han, Xiao ^a   Liu, Bo ^a   Li, Qin ^a   Hu, Lin ^a   Li, Zhi Yu ^a   Yuan, Qiang ^a   He, Da ^a   Xing, Yong Gang ^a  

^a Beijing Jishuitan Hospital   (China)

Author keywords

Cervical disc arthroplasty; Cervical disc herniation; Cervical spondylosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CERVICAL DISK ARTHROPLASTY; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOPROSTHESIS LOOSENING; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL SPINAL UNIT ANGULATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; MYELOGRAPHY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANGE OF MOTION; SPINAL ENDPLATE ANGULATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CERVICAL VERTEBRAE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78649234619     PISSN: 03666999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.2010.21.003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Tian W, Liu B, Li Q, Hu L, Li ZY, Yuan Q, et al. Functional evaluation of the cervical spine after Bryan artificial disc replacement. Chin J Surg (Chin) 2008; 46: 338-341.
2. Goffin J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, Lind B, Logroscino C, et al. Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 840-847.
3. Yoon DH, Yi S, Shin HC, Kim KN, Kim SH. Clinical and radiological results following cervical arthroplasty. Acta Neurochir 2006; 148: 943-950.
4. Pickett GE, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N. Complications with cervical arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 2006; 4: 98-105.
5. Kim HK, Kim MH, Cho DS, Kim SH. Surgical outcome of cervical arthroplasty using bryan. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009; 46: 532-537.
6. Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ, Park MS, Chung YK, McAfee PC. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J 2008; 17: 20-29.
7. Galbusera F, Bellini CM, Raimondi MT, Fornari M, Assietti R. Cervical spine biomechanics following implantation of a disc prosthesis. Med Eng Phys 2008; 30: 1127-1133.
8. Goffin J, van Loon J, Van Calenbergh F, Lipscomb B. A clinical analysis of 4- and 6-year follow-up results after cervical disc replacement surgery using the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12: 261-269.
9. Fong SY, DuPlessis SJ, Casha S, Hurlbert RJ. Design limitations of Bryan disc arthroplasty. Spine J 2006; 6: 233-241.
10. Pickett GE, Mitsis DK, Sekhon LH, Sears WR, Duggal N. Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on segmental and cervical spine alignment. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 17: E5.
11. Katsuura A, Hukuda S, Saruhashi Y, Mori K. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: 320-324.
12. Sears WR, Sekhon LH, Duggal N, Williamson OD. Segmental malalignment with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis-does it occur? J Spinal Disord Tech 2007; 20: 1-6.
13. Johnson JP, Lauryssen C, Cambron HO, Pashman R, Regan JJ, Anand N, et al. Sagittal alignment and the Bryan cervical artificial disc. Neurosurg Focus 2004; 17: E14.
14. Shim CS, Lee SH, Park HJ, Kang HS, Hwang JH. Early clinical and radiologic outcomes of cervical arthroplasty with Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2006; 19: 465-470.
15. Walraevens JR, Liu B, Sloten JV, Demaerel P, Goffin J. Postoperative segmental malalignment after surgery with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: is it related to the mechanics and design of the prosthesis? J Spinal Disord Tech 2010; 23: 372-376.
16. Lind B, Zoëga B, Anderson PA. A radiostereometric analysis of the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis. Spine 2007; 15: 885-891.
17. Jensen WK, Anderson PA, Nel L, Rouleau JP. Bone ingrowth in retrieved Bryan cervical disc prostheses. Spine 2005; 30: 2497-2502.
18. Zhang X, Ordway NR, Tan R, Rim BC, Fayyazi AH. Correlation of ProDisc-C failure strength with cervical bone mineral content and endplate strength. J Spinal Disord Tech 2008; 21: 400-405.
19. Bryan VE Jr. Cervical motion segment replacement. Eur Spine J 2002; 11 Suppl 2: S92-S97.
20. Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP, Carlson CS, Goffin J. The Bryan cervical disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J 2004; 4 (6 Suppl): 303S-309S.
21. Goffin J, Van Calenbergh F, van Loon J, Casey A, Kehr P, Liebig K, et al. Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis: single-level and bi-level. Spine 2003;28: 2673-2678.