Development of 3D parametric model of human spine and simulator for biomedical engineering education and scoliosis screening

Computer Applications in Engineering Education

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 434-444

  Devedzic, Goran ^a   Ristic, Branko ^b   Stefanovic, Miladin ^a   Cukovic, Sasa ^a   Lukovic, Tanja ^b  

^a Kragujevac University   (Serbia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KRAGUJEVAC   (Serbia)

Author keywords

3D parametric model; biomedical engineering; human spine; scoliosis simulation

Indexed keywords

3D MODELS; COMPUTER AIDED MODELING; HUMAN SPINE; INTERDISCIPLINARY FIELDS; MEDICAL FIELDS; PARAMETRIC MODELS; SCOLIOSIS SIMULATION; SPINAL DEFORMITY;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; BIOPHYSICS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; DIAGNOSIS; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; MODELS; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; VISUALIZATION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 84864650596     PISSN: 10613773     EISSN: 10990542     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cae.20411     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. L. Senhadji, M. Siebes, J. V. Sloten, and, N. Saranummi, Biomedical Engineering Trends in Europe, IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 23 (2007), 12-13.
2. T. C. Pilkington, F. M. Long, R. Plonsey, J. G. Webster, and, W. Welkowitz, Status and trends in biomedical engineering education, Eng Med Biol Mag 8 (1989), 9-17. (Pubitemid 19224720)
3. T. R. Harris, Recent advances and directions in biomedical engineering education, Eng Med Biol Mag IEEE 22 (2002), 30-31.
4. N. Kontodimopoulos, D. Cavouras, I. Kandarakis, B. Spyropoulos, E. Patsavoudi, and, E. Ventouras, Upgrading the biomedical engineering undergraduate curriculum based on current trends in higher education, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 7 (2004), 184-187.
5. J. Schröttner, Current Status of Biomedical Engineering Education Programs in Austria, http://www.oegbmt.at/drupal/?q=system/files/MBEC- Publikation.pdf.
6. R. N. Coger, and, H. V. de Silva, An integrated approach to teaching biotechnology and bioengineering to an interdisciplinary audience, Int J Eng Educ 15 (1999), 256-264.
7. P. King, Design and biomedical engineering, Inter JEng Educ 15 (1999), 282-287.
8. J. Pruijs, M. Hageman, W. Keessen, R. van der Meer, and, J. C. van Wieringen, Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis, Skeletal Radiol 23 (1994), 517-520. (Pubitemid 24316527)
9. A. Schmitz, U. E. Jaeger, R. Koenig, J. Kandyba, U. A. Wagner, J. Giesecke, and, O. Schmitt, A new MRI technique for imaging scoliosis in the sagittal plane, Eur Spine J 10 (2004), 114-117.
10. F. Berryman, P. Pynsent, J. Fairbank, and, S. Disney, A new system for measuring three-dimensional back shape in scoliosis, Eur Spine J 17 (2008), 663-672.
11. J. Cheung, J. P. Halbertsma, A. G. Veldhuizen, W. J. Sluiter, N. M. Maurits, J. C. Cool, and, J. R. van Horn, A preliminary study on electromyographic analysis of the paraspinal musculature in idiopathic scoliosis, Eur Spine J 14 (2005), 130-137. (Pubitemid 40468945)
12. V. Pazos, F. Cheriet, J. Danserau, J. Ronsky, R. F. Zernicke, and, H. Labelle, Reliability of trunk shape measurements based on 3-D surface reconstructions, Eur Spine J 16 (2007), 1882-1891. (Pubitemid 350105330)
13. J. L. Jaremko, P. Poncet, J. Ronsky, J. Harder, J. Dansereau, H. Labelle, and, R. F. Zernicke, Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis, Clin Biomech 17 (2002), 559-568. (Pubitemid 35292061)
14. G. H. Thompson, B. A. Akbarnia, and, M. Robert Jr., Growing rod techniques in early-onset scoliosis, J Pediatr Orthop 27 (2007), 354-361. (Pubitemid 46573194)
15. S.S. Hu, C. B. Tribus, R. K-B. Tay, and, N. N. Bhatia, Scoliosis section. Disorders, diseases and injuries of the spine. In:, H. B. Skinner, Ed., Current Diagnosis and Treatment in Orthopedics, 4th edition, chap. 5, Lange Medical/McGraw-Hill, New York, 2006, pp 255-269.
16. R. E. Eilert, and, J. D. Polousky, Scoliosis section of orthopedics. In:, W. W. Hay, M. J. Levin, J. M. Sondheimer, and, R. R. Deterding, Eds., Current diagnosis and treatment: pediatrics, 18th ed., chap. 24. Lange Medical/McGraw-Hill, New York, 2007, pp 791-792.
17. L. Y. Griffin, Ed., Scoliosis. In: Essentials of musculoskeletal care, 3rd edition. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, IL, 2006, pp 928-931.
18. M. L. Omey, L. J. Micheli, and, P. G. Gerbino, Idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolysis in the female athlete, Clin Orthop Relat Res 372 (2000), 74-84. (Pubitemid 30159436)
19. L. T. Staheli, Scoliosis in practice of pediatric orthopedics. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2001, pp 168-175.
20. J. L. Jaremko, P. Poncet, J. Ronsky, J. Harder, J. Dansereau, H. Labelle Ronald, and, F. Zernicke, Comparison of Cobb angles measured manually, calculated from 3-D spinal reconstruction, and estimated from torso asymmetry, Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 5 (2002), 277-281.
21. P. Patias, E. Stylianidis, M. Pateraki, Y. Chrysanthou, C. Contozis, and, T. Zavitsanakis, 3D digital photogrammetric reconstructions for scoliosis screening, Commission V, WG V/6, Proceedings of the ISPRS Commission V Symposium, Image engineering and vision metrology, Dresden, Germany, 25-27 September 2006, pp 1682-1750.
22. E. Kreighbaum, and, K. M. Barthels, Biomechanics: A qualitative approach for studying human movement. Macmillan, New York, 1990.
23. M. Cote, J. A. Boulay, B. Ozell, H. Labelle, and, C. E. C. Aubin, Virtual reality simulator for scoliosis surgery training: Transatlantic collaborative tests, Haptic Audio visual Environments and Games 2008.HAVE 2008.IEEE p 1-6. 10.1109/HAVE.2008.4685289.
24. G. Desroches, C.-E. Aubin, D. J. Sucato, and, C.-H. Rivard, Simulation of an anterior spine instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a flexible multi-body model, Med Biol Eng Comput 45 (2007), 759-768. (Pubitemid 47207753)