Indices of torso asymmetry related to spinal deformity in scoliosis

Clinical Biomechanics

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2002, Pages 559-568

  Jaremko, Jacob L ^a   Poncet, Philippe ^a   Ronsky, Janet ^a   Harder, James ^a   Dansereau, Jean ^b   Labelle, Hubert ^c   Zernicke, Ronald F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Diagnosis; Scoliosis; Surface imaging; Torso imaging

Indexed keywords

MEDICAL IMAGING; PATIENT MONITORING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; X RAYS;

SURFACE ROTATION;

BIOMECHANICS;

ADOLESCENT; AGE; ARTICLE; BODY SURFACE; BRACE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIODIAGNOSIS; RIB MALFORMATION; SCOLIOSIS; SPINE MALFORMATION; TRUNK;

ADOLESCENT; ANATOMY, CROSS-SECTIONAL; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; POSTURE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROTATION; SCOLIOSIS;

EID: 0036803296     PISSN: 02680033     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00099-2     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Levy A.R., Goldberg M.S., Mayo N.E., Hanley J.A., Poitras B. Reducing the lifetime risk of cancer from spinal radiographs among people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 21:1996;1540-1548.
2. Bunnell W.P. An objective criterion for scoliosis screening. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Am]. 66:1984;1381-1387.
3. Moreland M.S., Pope M.H., Wilder D.G., Stokes I., Frymoyer J.W. Moire fringe topography of the human body. Med. Instrum. 15:1981;129-132.
4. Willner S., Willner E. The role of Moire photography in evaluating minor scoliotic curves. Int. Orthop. 6:1982;55-60.
5. Karachalios T., Sofianos J., Roidis N., Sapkas G., Korres D., Nikolopoulos K. Ten-year follow-up evaluation of a school screening program for scoliosis. Is the forward-bending test an accurate diagnostic criterion for the screening of scoliosis? Spine. 24:1999;2318-2324.
6. Weisz I., Jefferson R.J., Turner-Smith A.R., Houghton G.R., Harris J.D. ISIS scanning: a useful assessment technique in the management of scoliosis. Spine. 13:1988;405-408.
7. Theologis T.N., Fairbank J.C., Turner-Smith A.R., Pantazopoulos T. Early detection of progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis by measurement of changes in back shape with the integrated shape imaging system scanner. Spine. 22:1997;1223-1227. discussion 1228.
8. Goldberg C.J., Kaliszer M., Moore D.P., Fogarty E.E., Dowling F.E. Surface topography, Cobb angles and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine. 26:2001;E55-63.
9. Thometz J.G., Lamdan R., Liu X.C., Lyon R. Relationship between Quantec measurement and Cobb angle in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. J. Pediatr. Orthop. 20:2000;512-516.
10. Dawson E.G., Kropf M.A., Purcell G., Kabo J.M., Kanim L.E., Burt C. Optoelectronic evaluation of trunk deformity in scoliosis. Spine. 18:1993;326-331.
11. Gomes A.S., Serra L.A., Lage A.S., Gomes A. Automated 360° profilometry of human trunk for spinal deformity analysis. D'Amico M. Three-dimensional analysis of spinal deformities. 1995;423-429 IOS Press, Amsterdam, NL.
12. Poncet P., Delorme S., Ronsky J.L., Dansereau J., Harder J., Clynch G.et al. Reconstruction of laser-scanned 3D torso topography and stereo-radiographical spine and rib-cage geometry in scoliosis. Comp. Meth. Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 4:2000;59-75.
13. Sciandra J., De J.C., Mauroy G., Rolet R., Kohler J.P. Accurate and fast non-contact 3D acquisition of the whole trunk. D'Amico M. Three-dimensional analysis of spinal deformities. 1995;81-85 IOS Press, Amsterdam, NL.
14. Korovessis P.G., Stamatakis M.V. Prediction of scoliotic cobb angle with the use of the scoliometer. Spine. 21:1996;1661-1666.
15. Stokes I.A., Moreland M.S. Concordance of back surface asymmetry and spine shape in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 14:1989;73-78.
16. Turner-Smith A.R., Harris J.D., Houghton G.R., Jefferson R.J. A method for analysis of back shape in scoliosis. J. Biomech. 21:1988;497-509.
17. Thulbourne T., Gillespie R. The rib hump in idiopathic scoliosis. Measurement, analysis and response to treatment. J. Bone Joint Surg. [Br.]. 58:1976;64-71.
18. Ono T. Trunk deformity in scoliosis studied by surface measurement. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi. 69:1995;915-926.
19. Huang S.C. Cut-off point of the scoliometer in school scoliosis screening. Spine. 22:1997;1985-1989.
20. Stokes I.A. Axial rotation component of thoracic scoliosis. J. Orthop. Res. 7:1989;702-708.
21. Suzuki N., Inami K., Ono T., Kohno K., Asher M.A. Analysis of posterior trunk symmetry (POTSI) in scoliosis. Stokes I.A.F. Research into spinal deformities II. 1999;81-84 IOS Press, Washington, DC.
22. Reamy B.V., Slakey J.B. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: review and current concepts. Am. Fam. Physician. 64:2001;111-116.
23. Tardif N, Poncet P, Ronsky JL, Dansereau J, Zernicke RF. Evaluation of a laser (optical) imaging technique for torso asymmetry measurement in scoliosis. In: Proceedings of Canadian Orthopedic Research Society 34th Annual Meeting 2000; Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, June 3-6, 2000. p. 70-1
24. Labelle H., Dansereau J., Bellefleur C., Jequier J.C. Variability of geometric measurements from three-dimensional reconstructions of scoliotic spines and rib cages. Eur. Spine J. 4:1995;88-94.
25. Jaremko J.L., Poncet P., Ronsky J.L., Zernicke R.F. Estimation of vertebral levels from torso surface data. Arch. Physiol. Biochem. 108:2000;198.
26. Beer FP, Johnston ER. Moments of areas. In: Mechanics of materials. 2nd SI Edition ed. London: McGraw-Hill; 1992. p. 690-9
27. Herzenberg J.E., Waanders N.A., Closkey R.F., Schultz A.B., Hensinger R.N. Cobb angle versus spinous process angle in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis the relationship of the anterior and posterior deformities. Spine. 15:1990;874-879.
28. Drerup B., Hierholzer E. Assessment of scoliotic deformity from back shape asymmetry using an improved mathematical model. Clin. Biomech. 11:1996;376-383.
29. Asamoah V., Mellerowicz H., Venus J., Klockner C. Measuring the surface of the back. Value in diagnosis of spinal diseases. Orthopade. 29:2000;480-489.
30. Goldberg M.S., Poitras B., Mayo N.E., Labelle H., Bourassa R., Cloutier R. Observer variation in assessing spinal curvature and skeletal development in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 13:1988;1371-1377.
31. Morrissy R.T., Goldsmith G.S., Hall E.C., Kehl D., Cowie G.H. Measurement of the Cobb angle on radiographs of patients who have scoliosis. Evaluation of intrinsic error. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 72:1990;320-327.
32. Villemure I., Aubin C.E., Grimard G., Dansereau J., Labelle H. Progression of vertebral and spinal three-dimensional deformities in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a longitudinal study. Spine. 26:2001;2244-2250.
33. Poncet P., Dansereau J., Labelle H. Geometric torsion in idiopathic scoliosis: a 3D analysis and a proposal for a new classification. Spine. 26:2001;2235-2243.