A pool of pairs of related objects (POPORO) for investigating visual semantic integration: Behavioral and electrophysiological validation

Brain Topography

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 272-284

  Kovalenko, Lyudmyla Y ^a,b   Chaumon, Maximilien ^b   Busch, Niko A ^a,b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

GLM; N300; Object recognition; Semantic congruency; Shape matching; Similarity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; NERVOUS SYSTEM ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; POOL OF PAIRS OF RELATED OBJECTS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA IMAGE; VISUAL SEMANTIC INTEGRATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

ADULT; BEHAVIOR; COGNITION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); REPETITION PRIMING; SEMANTICS;

EID: 84864643682     PISSN: 08960267     EISSN: 15736792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-011-0216-8     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Auckland ME, Cave KR, Donnelly N (2007) Nontarget objects can influence perceptual processes during object recognition. Psychon Bull Rev 14(2):332-337
2. Bar M (2004) Visual objects in context. Nat Rev Neurosci 5(8): 617-629 (Pubitemid 39013593)
3. Bar M, Aminoff E (2003) Cortical analysis of visual context. Neuron 38(2):347-358 (Pubitemid 36555659)
4. Barrett SE, Rugg MD (1990) Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain Cogn 14(2):201-212
5. Berkum JJAV, Brown CM, Zwitserlood P, Kooijman V, Hagoort P (2005) Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31(3):443-467 (Pubitemid 40816175)
6. Biederman I, Mezzanotte RJ, Rabinowitz JC (1982) Scene perception: detecting and judging objects undergoing relational violations. Cogn Psychol 14(2):143-177
7. Block CK, Baldwin CL (2010) Cloze probability and completion norms for 498 sentences: behavioral and neural validation using event-related potentials. Behav Res Methods 42(3):665-670
8. Bloom PA, Fischler I (1980) Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts. Mem Cogn 8(6):631-642
9. Busch NA, Debener S, Kranczioch C, Engel AK, Herrmann CS (2004) Size matters: effects of stimulus size, duration and eccentricity on the visual gamma-band response. Clin Neurophysiol 115(8):1810-1820 (Pubitemid 38952949)
10. Busch NA, Herrmann CS, Müller MM, Lenz D, Gruber T (2006) A cross-laboratory study of event-related gamma activity in a standard object recognition paradigm. Neuroimage 33(4):1169-1177 (Pubitemid 44708785)
11. Celesia G (1993) Visual evoked potentials and electroretinograms. In: Niedermeyer E, Lopes Da Silva F (eds) Electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications and related fields. Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, pp 911-936
12. Davenport JL, Potter MC (2004) Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychol Sci 15(8):559-564 (Pubitemid 39080421)
13. Federmeier KD (2007) Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology 44(4): 491-505 (Pubitemid 46905328)
14. Federmeier KD, Kutas M (2002) Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia 40(7):730-747 (Pubitemid 34233612)
15. Field A (2009) Discovering statistics Using SPSS (introducing statistical methods series). Sage, Beverly Hills
16. Fründ I, Busch NA, Körner U, Schadow J, Herrmann CS (2007) EEG oscillations in the gamma and alpha range respond differently to spatial frequency. Vision Res 47(15):2086-2098 (Pubitemid 46907249)
17. Ganis G, Kutas M (2003) An electrophysiological study of scene effects on object identification. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 16(2): 123-144 (Pubitemid 36369311)
18. Ganis G, Kutas M, Sereno M (1996) The search for "common sense": an electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. J Cogn Neurosci 8(2):89-106
19. Gaspar CM, Rousselet GA, Pernet CR (2011) Reliability of ERP and single-trial analyses. Neuroimage 58(2):620-629
20. Grill-Spector K, Henson R, Martin A (2006) Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects. Trends Cogn Sci 10(1):14-23 (Pubitemid 43049768)
21. Hamm JP, Johnson BW, Kirk IJ (2002) Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clin Neurophysiol 113(8):1339-1350 (Pubitemid 34874526)
22. Hauk O, Davis MH, Ford M, Pulvermüller F, Marslen-Wilson WD (2006) The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage 30(4):1383-1400
23. Holcomb PJ, McPherson WB (1994) Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task. Brain Cogn 24(2):259-276 (Pubitemid 2046684)
24. Hollingworth A, Henderson JM (1999) Object identification is isolated from scene semantic constraint: evidence from object type and token discrimination. Acta Psychol (Amst) 102(2-3):319-343
25. Kiebel SJ, Friston KJ (2004) Statistical parametric mapping for eventrelated potentials: I. Generic considerations. Neuroimage 22(2): 492-502 (Pubitemid 38759412)
26. Kiefer M, Brendel D (2006) Attentional modulation of unconscious "automatic" processes: evidence from event-related potentials in a masked priming paradigm. J Cogn Neurosci 18(2): 184-198
27. Knebel J, Toepel U, Hudry J, le Coutre J, Murray MM (2008) Generating controlled image sets in cognitive neuroscience research. Brain Topogr 20(4):284-289
28. Kouider S, Dehaene S (2007) Levels of processing during nonconscious perception: a critical review of visual masking. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 362(1481):857-875 (Pubitemid 47056815)
29. Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2000) Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends Cogn Sci 4(12): 463-470
30. Kutas M, Federmeier KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annu Rev Psychol 62:621-647
31. Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1980) Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science 207(4427):203-205 (Pubitemid 10141432)
32. Kutas M, Hillyard SA (1984) Brain potentials during reading reflectword expectancy and semantic association. Nature 307(5947):161-163 (Pubitemid 14132900)
33. Lau EF, Phillips C, Poeppel D (2008) A cortical network for semantics: (de)constructing the N400. Nat Rev Neurosci 9(12): 920-933
34. Ling H, Jacobs DW (2007) Shape classification using the innerdistance. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 29(2):286-299
35. Maris E, Oostenveld R (2007) Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. J Neurosci Methods 164(1):177-190 (Pubitemid 46950991)
36. McPherson WB, Holcomb PJ (1999) An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology 36(1):53-65 (Pubitemid 29044456)
37. Mudrik L, Lamy D, Deouell LY (2010) ERP evidence for context congruity effects during simultaneous object-scene processing. Neuropsychologia 48(2):507-517
38. Nigam A, Hoffman J, Simons R (1992) N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words. J Cogn Neurosci 4(1):15-22
39. Nolan H, Whelan R, Reilly RB (2010) Faster: fully automated statistical thresholding for EEG artifact rejection. J Neurosci Methods 192(1):152-162
40. Oliva A, Torralba A (2007) The role of context in object recognition. Trends Cogn Sci 11(12):520-527 (Pubitemid 350181571)
41. Pernet CR, Chauveau N, Gaspar C, Rousselet GA (2011) LIMO EEG: a toolbox for hierarchical LInear MOdeling of ElectroEncephalo-Graphic data. Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:831,409
42. Poynton C (2003) Digital video and HDTV: algorithms and interfaces. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
43. Reiss JE, Hoffman JE (2006) Object substitution masking interferes with semantic processing: evidence from event-related potentials. Psychol Sci 17(12):1015-1020 (Pubitemid 44952672)
44. Rousselet GA, Pernet CR, Bennett PJ, Sekuler AB (2008) Parametric study of EEG sensitivity to phase noise during face processing. BMC Neurosci 9:98
45. Schadow J, Lenz D, Thaerig S, Busch NA, Fründ I, Rieger JW, Herrmann CS (2007) Stimulus intensity affects early sensory processing: visual contrast modulates evoked gamma-band activity in human EEG. Int J Psychophysiol 66(1):28-36 (Pubitemid 47361384)
46. Schwanenflugel P, LaCount K (1988) Semantic relatedness and the scope of facilitation for upcoming words in sentences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 14(2):344
47. Sitnikova T, Holcomb PJ, Kiyonaga KA, Kuperberg GR (2008) Two neurocognitive mechanisms of semantic integration during the comprehension of visual real-world events. J Cogn Neurosci 20(11):2037-2057
48. Stenberg G, Lindgren M, Johansson M, Olsson A, Rosén I (2000) Semantic processing without conscious identification: evidence from event-related potentials. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 26(4):973-1004
49. Vogel EK, Luck SJ, Shapiro KL (1998) Electrophysiological evidence for a postperceptual locus of suppression during the attentional blink. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(6): 1656-1674 (Pubitemid 128458897)