GULiVER-travelling into the heart of good doctor-patient communication from a patient perspective: Study protocol of an international multicentre study

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 464-469

  Moretti, Francesca ^a   Fletcher, Ian ^b   Mazzi, Maria Angela ^a   Deveugele, Myriam ^c   Rimondini, Michela ^a   Geurts, Corine ^d   Zimmermann, Christa ^a   Bensing, Jozien ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^c GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^d UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BELGIUM; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT CARE; PILOT STUDY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIOECONOMICS; UNITED KINGDOM; VIDEORECORDING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; BELGIUM; COMMUNICATION; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; ITALY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; VIDEOTAPE RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84864549287     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: 1464360X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckr071     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. British Medical Association Board of Medical Education: Communication skills education for doctors: an update. London: BM 2004.
2. General Medical Council. Tomorrow's Doctors: Recommendations on Undergraduate Medical Education. London: GM 2002.
3. General Medical Council. Good Medical Practice. London: GM 2006.
4. Humphris Kaney S. The Liverpool Brief Assessment System for communication skills in the making of doctors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2001;6:69-80. (Pubitemid 33645942)
5. Vettore Tenore A. Presentazione del Core Curriculum per le abilità pratiche. Med Chir 2003;21:693-748.
6. Reznick Regehr Yee et al. Process rating forms vs task-specific checklists in an OSCE for medical licensure. Acad Med 1998;73:97-9.
7. Humphris Kaney S. Assessing the development of communication skills in undergraduate medical students. Med Educ 2001;35:225-31. (Pubitemid 32222583)
8. Kinderman Humphris G. The role of cognitive schema in clinical communication skills teaching. Med Educ 1995;29:436-42. (Pubitemid 26033037)
9. von Fragstein Silverman Cushing et al. UK consensus statement on the content of communication curricula in undergraduate medical education. Med Educ 2008;42:1100-1107.
10. Rothman A Cusimano M. A Comparison of physician examiners', standardized patients', and communication experts' ratings of international medical graduates' english proficiency. Acad Med 2000;75:1206-11. (Pubitemid 32038195)
11. Greco Spike Powell Brownlea A. Assessing communication skills of GP registrars: a comparison of patient and GP examiner ratings. Med Educ 2002;36:366-76. (Pubitemid 34299196)
12. (Pubitemid 40875243)
13. Van Zanten Boulet J McKinley D. Using standardized patients to assess the interpersonal skills of physicians: six years' experience with a high-stakes certification examination. Health Commun 2007;22:195-205.
14. Mazor K Zanetti M Alper E et al. Assessing professionalism in the context of an objective structured clinical examination: an in-depth study of the rating process. Med Educ 2007;41:331-40. (Pubitemid 46569361)
15. (Pubitemid 30105630)
16. Makoul Krupat Chang CH. Measuring patient views of physician communication skills: development and testing of the Communication Assessment Tool. Patient Educ Couns 2007;67:333-42. (Pubitemid 46990732)
17. Sitzia J. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1999;11:319-28. (Pubitemid 29395018)
18. Rosenthal G Shannon SE. The use of patient perceptions in the evaluation of health-care delivery systems. Med Care 1997;35(SUPPL 11):58-68.
19. Mead Bower Roland M. The General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ)- development and psychometric characteristics. BMC Fam Pract 2008;20:9-13.
20. Williams Coyle Healy D. The meaning of patient satisfaction: an explanation of high reported levels. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1351-9. (Pubitemid 28444749)
21. Staniszewska Henderson L. Patients evaluations of their health care: the expression of negative evaluation and the role of adaptive strategies. Patient Educ Couns 2004;55:185-92. (Pubitemid 39458216)
22. Staniszewska S Henderson L. Patients' evaluations of the quality of care: influencing factors and the importance of engagement. J Adv Nurs 2005;49:530-7. (Pubitemid 40353508)
23. Wensing Jung H Mainz et al. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for General Practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain. Soc Sci Med 1998;47:1573-88. (Pubitemid 28482440)
24. Gribble R Haupt C. Quantitative and qualitative differences between handout and mailed patient satisfaction surveys. Med Care 2005;43:276-81. (Pubitemid 40353910)
25. Coulter A. Can patients assess the quality of health care? Patients' surveys should ask about real experiences of medical care. BMJ 2006;333:1-2.
26. Humphris G Kaney S. The Liverpool brief assessment system for communication skills in the making of doctors. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2001;6:69-80. (Pubitemid 33645942)
27. Nelson Wasson Kirk et al. Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP chart method and preliminary findings. J Chron Dis 1987;40:55-63.
28. Goldberg Williams P. The User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. NFER/ NELSON: Windso Sloug 1998.
29. Van Den Brink-Muinen Van Dulmen A Jung H Bensing JM. Do our talks with patients meet their expectations? J Fam Pract 2007;56:559-68. (Pubitemid 47105637)
30. Van den Brink-Muinen Verhaak PF Bensing J et al. Doctor-patient communication in different European health care systems: relevance and performance from the patients' perspective. Patient Educ Couns 2000;39:115-27.
31. Hall M Camacho Dugan Balkrishnan R. Trust in the medical profession: conceptual and measurement issues. Health Serv Res 2002;37:1419-38.
32. Zimmermann Del Piccolo Bensing et al. Coding patient cues and concerns in medical consultations: the Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences (VR-CoDES). Pat Educ Couns 2011;82:141-8.
33. Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Son 1996.