Coding patient emotional cues and concerns in medical consultations: The Verona coding definitions of emotional sequences (VR-CoDES)

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 82, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 141-148

  Zimmermann, Christa ^a   Del Piccolo, Lidia ^a   Bensing, Jozien ^b   Bergvik, Svein ^c   De Haes, Hanneke ^d   Eide, Hilde ^e   Fletcher, Ian ^f   Goss, Claudia ^a   Heaven, Cathy ^g   Humphris, Gerry ^h   Kim, Young Mi ⁱ   Langewitz, Wolf ^j   Meeuwesen, Ludwien ^k   Nuebling, Matthias ^l   Rimondini, Michela ^a   Salmon, Peter ^f   van Dulmen, Sandra ^b   Wissow, Larry ⁱ   Zandbelt, Linda ^j   Finset, Arnstein ^m  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERONA   (Italy)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

^f UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^g CHRISTIE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

ⁱ JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^k UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^l Empirical Consulting GmBH   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

more..

Author keywords

Coding definitions; Concern; Cue; VR CoDES

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; CONSENSUS; CONSULTATION; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EMOTIONAL STRESS; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT CODING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VERBAL COMMUNICATION; VERONA CODING DEFINITION OF EMOTIONAL SEQUENCES;

EID: 78651510466     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Suchman A.L., Markakis K., Beckman H.B., Frankel R. A model of empathic communication in the medical interview. J Am Med Assoc 1997, 277:678-682.
2. Levinson W., Horawara-Bhat R., Lamb J. A study of patient clues and physician responses in primary care and surgical settings. J Am Med Assoc 2000, 284:1021-1027.
3. Butow P.N., Brown R.F., Gogar S., Tattersall M.H.N., Dunn S.M. Oncologists reaction to cancer patients' verbal cues. Psycho-Oncol 2002, 11:47-58.
4. Heaven C., Maguire P., Green C. A patient-centred approach to defining and assessing interviewing competency. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2003, 12:89-91.
5. Heaven C.M., Maguire P. The relationship between patients' concerns and psychological distress in a hospice setting. Psycho-Oncol 1998, 7:502-507.
6. Shields C.G., Epstein R.M., Franks P., Fiscella K., Duberstein P., McDaniel S.H., et al. Emotion language in primary care encounters: reliability and validity of an emotion word count coding system. Patient Educ Couns 2005, 57:232-238.
7. Zachariae R., Pedersen C.G., Jensen A.B., Ehrnrooth E., Rossen P.B., von der Maase H. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Brit J Cancer 2003, 88:658-665.
8. Uitterhoeve R., Bensing J., Dilven E., Donders R., deMulder P., van Achterberg T. Nurse-patient communication in cancer care: does responding to patient's cues predict patient satisfaction with communication. Psycho-Oncology 2009, 18:1060-1068.
9. Beckman H.B., Frankel R.M. The effect of physician behaviour on the collection of data. Ann Int Med 1984, 101:692-696.
10. Branch W.T., Malik T.K. Using 'windows of opportunities' in brief interviews to understand patients' concerns. J Am Med Assoc 1993, 269:1667-1668.
11. Maguire P., Faulkner A., Booth K., Elliot C., Hillier V. Helping cancer patients disclose their concerns. Eur J Cancer 1996, 32:78-81.
12. Robinson J.D. Closing medical encounters: two physician practices and their implications for the expression of patients' unstated concerns. Soc Sci Med 2001, 53:639-656.
13. Lang F., Floyd M.R., Beine K., Buck P. Sequenced questioning to elicit patient's perspective on illness: effects on information disclosure, patient satisfaction, time expenditure. Fam Med 2002, 43:325-330.
14. Goldberg D., Jenkins L., Miller T., Faragher E.B. The ability of trainee general practitioners to identify psychological distress among their patients. Psychol Med 1993, 23:185-193.
15. Del Piccolo L., Saltini A., Zimmermann C., Dunn G. Differences in verbal behaviours of patients with and without emotional distress during primary care consultations. Psychol Med 2000, 30:629-643.
16. Fallowfield L., Ratcliffe D., Jenkins V., Saul J. Psychiatric morbidity and its recognition by doctors in patients with cancer. Brit J Cancer 2001, 84:1011-1015.
17. Brown R.F., Butow P.N., Henmann M., Dunn S.M., Boyle F., Tattersall M.H. Responding to the active and passive patient: Flexibility is the key. Health Expectations 2002, 5:236-245.
18. Bylund C.L., Makoul G. Empathic communication and gender in the physician-patient encounter. Patient Educ Couns 2002, 48:207-216.
19. Street R.L. Communicative styles and adaptations in physician-parent consultations. Soc Sci Med 1992, 34:1155-1163.
20. Roter D.L. The Roter method of interaction process analysis: RIAS manual 1993, The John's Hopkins University, Baltimore.
21. Butow P.N., Dunn S.M., Tattersall M.H.N., Jones Q.J. Computer-based interaction analysis of the cancer consultation. Brit J Cancer 1995, 71:115-121.
22. Heaven C, Green C. Medical Interview Aural Rating Scale. Unpublished report. CRUK Psychological Medicine Group, University of Manchester; 1999.
23. Ford S., Hall A., Ratcliffe D., Fallowfield L. The Medical Interaction Process System (MIPS): an instrument for analyzing interview of oncologists and patients with cancer. Soc Sci Med 2000, 50:553-566.
24. Del Piccolo L., Putnam S.M., Mazzi M.A., Zimmermann C. The biopsychosocial domains and the functions of the medical interview in primary care: construct validity of the Verona Medical Interview Classification System. Patient Educ Couns 2004, 53:47-56.
25. Zimmermann C., Del Piccolo L., Finset A. Cues and concerns by patients in medical consultations. A literature review. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:438-463.
26. Humphris G. Verona Network on Sequence Analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2004, 53:247-250.
27. Del Piccolo L., Goss C., Zimmermann C. The third meeting of the Verona Network on Sequence Analysis. Finding common grounds in defining patient cues and concerns and the appropriateness of provider responses. Patient Educ Couns 2005, 57:241-244.
28. Del Piccolo L., Goss C., Bergvik S. The fourth meeting of the Verona Network on Sequence Analysis " Consensus finding on the appropriateness of provider responses to patient cues and concerns" Patient Educ Couns 2006, 61:473-475.
29. Bergvik S, Del Piccolo L. The fifth meeting (2007) of the Verona Network on Sequence Analysis - " Coding of health provider talk to patient cues and concerns" (). http://www.each.eu/.
30. Roter D.L., Larson S.M., Beach M.C., Cooper L.A. Interactive and evaluative correlates of dialogue sequence: a simulation study applying the RIAS to turn taking structures. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 71:26-33.
31. Stiles W.B. Describing talk: a taxonomy of verbal response modes 1992, Sage, Newbury Park.
32. Ekman P., Friesen W.V. The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: categories, origins, usage, and encoding. Semiotica 1969, 1:49-98.
33. Stewart M., Brown J.B., Donner A., McWhinney I.R., Oates J., Weston W.W., et al. The impact of patient-centered care on outcomes. J Fam Pract 2000, 49:796-804.
34. Little P., Everitt H., Williamson I., Warner G., Moore M., Gould C., et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. Br Med J 2001, 323:908-911.
35. Detmar S.B., Aaronson N.K., Wever L.D.V., Muller M., Schornagel J.H. How are you feeling? Who wants to know? Patients' and oncologists' preferences for discussing health-related quality-of-life. J Clin Oncol 2000, 13:3295-3301.
36. Goldberg D., Williams P. The user's guide to the general health questionnaires 1988, NFER-Nelson, Windsor.
37. Van Dulmen A.M., Nübling M., Langewitz W. Doctors' responses to patients' concerns: an exploration of communication sequences in gynaecology. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2003, 12:98-102.
38. Zandbelt L.C., Smets E.M.A., Oort F.J., Godfried M.H., de Haes J.C.J.M. Patient participation in the medical specialist encounter: does physicians' patient-centred communication matter?. Patient Educ Couns 2007, 65:396-406.
39. Del Piccolo L., de Haes H., Heaven C., Jansen J., Verheul W., Bensing J., et al. Coding provider responses to cues and concerns. Development of the Verona CoDES-P framework. Patient Educ Couns; 2010, 82:149-155.
40. Jefferson G., Lee J. The rejection of advice: managing the problematic convergence of a 'troubles-telling' and a 'service encounter'. Talk at work 1992, 521-548. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. Drew, J. Heritage (Eds.).
41. Ruusuvuori J. 'Empathy' and 'sympathy' in action: attending to patients' troubles in Finnish homeopathic and general practice consultations. Soc Psychol Quart 2005, 68:204-222.
42. Kim Y.M., Kols A., Prammawat S., Rinehart W. Sequence analysis: responsiveness of doctors to patient cues during Family planning consultations in Mexico. Patient Educ Couns 2005, 58:114-117.
43. Eide H., Frankel R., Haaversen A.C.B., Vaupel K.A., Graugaard P., Finset A. Listening for feelings. Identifying and coding empathic and potential empathic opportunities in medical dialogues. Patient Educ Couns 2004, 54:291-297.
44. Meeuwesen L., Schnap C., van der Strak C. Verbal analysis of doctor-patient communication. Soc Sci Med 1991, 32:1143-1150.