Patients views on changes in doctor-patient communication between 1982 and 2001: A mixed-methods study

BMC Family Practice

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Butalid, Ligaya ^a   Verhaak, Peter F M ^a,b   Boeije, Hennie R ^c   Bensing, Jozien M ^a,c  

^a NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Analogue patients; Doctor patient communication; General practice; Mixed methods design; Quality of care; Video observation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COUNSELING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT CARE; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL CLASS; STANDARD; STATISTICS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PROBLEM SOLVING; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL CLASS; TIME AND MOTION STUDIES; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84864540096     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712296     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-80     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: a study of videotaped General Practice consultations with hypertension patients. Bensing JM, Tromp F, Van Dulmen S, Van den Brink-Muinen A, Verheul W, Schellevis FG, BMC Fam Pract 2006 7 62 68 10.1186/1471-2296-7-62 17064407
2. Has patients involvement in the decision-making process changed over time? Van den Brink-Muinen A, Van Dulmen SM, De Haes HC, Visser AP, Schellevis FG, Bensing JM, Health Expect 2006 9 333 342 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00413.x 17083560
3. Changes in the quality of doctor-patient communication between 1982 and 2001: an observational study on hypertension care as perceived by patients and general practitioners. Butalid L, Verhaak PFM, Tromp F, Bensing JM, BMJ Open 2011 1 000203 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000203 22021787
4. NHG-Standaard Diabetes mellitus type 2 [National clinical guideline: Diabetes mellitus type 2]. Cromme PVM, Mulder JD, Rutten GEHM, Zuidweg J, Thomas S, Huisarts Wet 1998 32 15 18
5. NHG-Standaard. Orale Anticonceptie [National clinical guideline: Oral contraception]. Moors JPC, Sips AJBI, Huisarts Wet 1989 32 62 65
6. Development of guidelines for general practice care. Grol R, Br J Gen Pract 1993 43 146 151 8323800
7. NHG-standaarden Nederlands Huisartsen Genootschap http://nhg.artsennet. nl/kenniscentrum/k-richtlijnen/k-nhgstandaarden.htm] retrieved: March 15, 2012
8. Communication in medical encounters. Bensing JM, Verhaak PFM, Health Psychology Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, Kaptein A, Weinman J, 2004
9. Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. Elwyn G, Edwards A, Kinnersley P, Br J Gen Pract 1999 49 447 482 10562743
10. Bridging the gap, The separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicine. Bensing J, Patient Educ Couns 2000 39 17 25 10.1016/S0738-3991(99)00087-7 11013544
11. Entwistle V, ODonnell M, Evidence-based health care: what roles for patients? In Evidence-based patient choice: inevitable or impossible? Edited by Edwards A, Elwyn G Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001 34 49
12. Patient-centeredness in medicine. Stewart M, Brown JB, Evidence-based patient choice: inevitable or impossible? Oxford University Press, Oxford, Edwards A, Elwyn G, 2001 97 117
13. Evidence Based Medicine and Shared Decision Making: The challenge of getting both evidence and preferences into health care. Barratt A, Patient Educ Couns 2008 73 407 412 10.1016/j.pec.2008.07.054 18845414
14. White KL, The task of medicine: dialogue at Wickenburg The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park 1988
15. Methods for incorporating patients views in health care. Wensing M, Elwyn G, BMJ 2003 326 877 879 10.1136/bmj.326.7394.877 12702627
16. How valid and reliable are patient satisfaction data? An analysis of 195 studies. Sitzia J, Int J Qual Health Care 1999 11 319 328 10.1093/intqhc/11.4. 319 10501602
17. The relationship between checklist scores on a communication OSCE and analogue patients perceptions of communication. Mazor KM, Ockene JK, Rogers HJ, Carlin MM, Quirk ME, Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2005 10 37 51 10.1007/s10459-004-1790-2 15912283
18. She gave it her best shot right away: patients experiences of biomedical and patient-centered communication. Swenson SL, Zettler P, Lo B, Patient Educ Couns 2006 61 200 211 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.019 16154311
19. Assessing professionalism in the context of an objective structured clinical examination: an in-depth study of the rating process. Mazor KM, Zanetti ML, Alper EJ, Hatem D, Barrett SV, Meterko V, Gammon W, Pugnaire MP, Med Educ 2007 41 331 340 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02692.x 17430277
20. How patients perceive a doctors caring attitude. Quirk M, Mazor K, Haley HL, Philbin M, Fischer M, Sullivan K, Hatem D, Patient Educ Couns 2008 72 359 366 10.1016/j.pec.2008.05.022 18684582
21. A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries. Moretti F, Van Vliet L, Bensing J, Deledda G, Mazzi M, Rimondini M, Zimmerman C, Fletcher I, Patient Educ Couns 2011 82 420 428 10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.005 21292424
22. How to make the medical consultation more successful from a patients perspective? Tips for doctors and patients from lay people in the United Kingdom, Italy, Belgium and the Netherlands. Bensing JM, Deveugele M, Moretti F, Fletcher I, Van Vliet L, Van Bogaert M, Rimondini M, Patient Educ Couns 2011 84 287 293 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.008 21795007
23. Relations between physicians behaviors and analogue patients satisfaction, recall, and impressions. Roter DL, Hall JA, Katz NR, Med Care 1987 25 437 451 10.1097/00005650-198705000-00007 3695654
24. Task and socioemotional behaviors of physicians: A test of reciprocity and social interaction theories in analogue physician-patient encounters. Roberts CA, Aruguete MS, Soc Sci Med 2000 50 309 315 10.1016/S0277-9536(99) 00245-2 10626757
25. Can naive viewers put themselves in the patients shoes? Reliability and validity of the analogue patient methodology. Blanch-Hartigan D, Hall JA, Krupat E, Irish JT, Med Care 2012 Epub ahead of print
26. The validity of using analogue patients in practitioner-patient communication research: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Van Vliet LM, Van der Wall E, Albada A, Spreeuwenberg PMM, Verheul W, Bensing JM, J Gen Intern Med 2012 Epub ahead of print 10.1007/s11606-012-2111-8
27. Important elements of outpatient care: A comparison of patients and physicians opinions. Laine C, Davidoff F, Lewis CE, Nelson EC, Nelson E, Kessler RC, Delbanco TL, Ann Intern Med 1996 125 640 645 8849148
28. Patients ideas about medicines: a qualitative study in a general practice population. Britten N, Br J Gen Pract 1994 44 465 468 7748635
29. The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research? Caron-Flinterman JF, Broerse JEW, Bunders JFG, Soc Sci Med 2005 60 2575 2584 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.023 15814182
30. Stewart M, Roter D, Communicating with medical patients Sage Publications, Newbury Park 1989
31. Is communication a skill? Communication behaviors and being in relation. Zoppi K, Epstein RM, Fam Med 2002 34 319 324 12038712
32. Qualitative research on health communication: What can it contribute? Britten N, Patient Educ Couns 2011 82 384 388 10.1016/j.pec.2010.12.021 21242048
33. Lay perceptions of type 2 diabetes in Scotland: bringing health services back in. Lawton J, Peel E, Parry O, Araoz G, Douglas M, Soc Sci Med 2005 60 1423 1435 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.013 15652676
34. Focus group research and the patients view Lehoux P, Poland B, Daudelin G, Soc Sci Med 2006 63 2091 2104 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016 16797811
35. Stress and coronary heart disease: psychosocial risk factors. Bunker SJ, Colquhoun DM, Esler MD, Hickie IA, Hunt D, Jelinek VM, Oldenburg BF, Peach HG, Ruth D, Tennant CC, Tonkin AM, Med J Aust 2003 178 272 276 12633484
36. Detection of psychologic complaints by general practitioners. Verhaak PFM, Med Care 1988 26 1009 1020 10.1097/00005650-198810000-00009 3172865
37. Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Bensing J, Soc Sci Med 1991 32 1301 1310 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90047-G 2068614
38. Instrumental and affective aspects of physician behavior. Bensing J, Dronkers J, Med Care 1992 30 283 298 10.1097/00005650-199204000-00001 1556878
39. Van den Brink-Muinen A, Van Dulmen AM, Schellevis FG, Bensing JM, Tweede Nationale Studie naar ziekten en verrichtingen in de huisartspraktijk: oog voor communicatie: huisarts-patint communicatie in Nederland [The second National Study of diseases and actions in General Practice: An eye for communication: Doctor-patient communication in the Netherlands] NIVEL, Utrecht 2004
40. The Roter interaction analysis system (RIAS): utility and flexibility for analysis of medical interactions. Roter D, Larson S, Patient Educ Couns 2002 46 243 251 10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00012-5 11932123
41. Roter DL, The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis (unpublished manual) RIASWorks, Baltimore 1987
42. Roter DL, The Roter Method of Interaction Process Analysis (unpublished manual) RIASWorks, Baltimore 1993
43. Boeije H, Analysis in Qualitative Research Sage, London 2010
44. Shared decision-making in primary care: Tailoring the Charles et al. model to fit the context of general practice. Murray E, Charles C, Gafni A, Patient Educ Couns 2006 62 205 211 10.1016/j.pec.2005.07.003 16139467
45. Patient involvement in clinical decision making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction. Carlsen B, Aakvik A, Health Expect 2006 9 148 157 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00385.x 16677194
46. Inside the black box of shared decision making: distinguishing between the process of involvement and who makes the decision. Edwards A, Elwyn G, Health Expect 2006 9 307 320 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2006.00401.x 17083558
47. Measurement of shared decision making: a review of instruments. Scholl I, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Sepucha K, Elwyn G, Légaré F, Härter M, Dirmaier J, Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2011 105 313 324 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.04.012 21620327
48. Are physicians attitudes of respect accurately perceived by patients and associated with more positive communication behaviors? Beach MC, Roter DL, Wang NY, Duggan PS, Cooper LA, Patient Educ Couns 2006 62 347 354 10.1016/j.pec.2006.06.004 16859867
49. Physicians opening questions and patients satisfaction. Robinson JD, Heritage J, Patient Educ Couns 2006 60 279 285 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.009 16431070
50. How do lay people assess the quality of physicians' communicative responses to patients' emotional cues and concerns? An international multicentre study based on videotaped medical consultations. Mazzi MA, Bensing J, Rimondini M, Fletcher I, van Vliet L, Zimmermann C, Deveugele M, Patient Educ Couns 2011 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.010
51. Acquisition of communication skills in postgraduate training for general practice. Kramer AWM, Düsman H, Tan LHC, Jansen JJM, Grol RPTM, Van der Vleuten CPM, Med Educ 2004 38 158 167 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01747.x 14871386
52. In what way may videotapes be used to get significant information about the patient-physician relationship? Arborelius E, Timpka T, Med Teach 1990 12 197 208 10.3109/01421599009006697 2079895
53. Using video-recorded consultations for research in primary care: advantages and limitations. Coleman T, Fam Pract 2000 17 422 427 10.1093/fampra/17.5.422 11021903