Targeted issue advertising and legislative strategy: The inside ends of outside lobbying

Journal of Politics

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 888-902

  Hall, Richard L ^a   Reynolds, Molly E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864458526     PISSN: 00223816     EISSN: 14682508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S002238161200031X     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ainsworth, Scott H. 1997. ''The Role of Legislators in the Determination of Interest Group Influence.'' Legislative Studies Quarterly 12 (4): 517-33.
2. Anderson, Richard. 2009. ''Lobbying, Issue Uptake, and Legislative Behavior.'' University of Michigan. Typescript.
3. Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
4. Austen-Smith, David, and John R. Wright. 1994. ''Counteractive Lobbying.'' American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 25-44.
5. Baumgartner, Frank R., Jeffrey M. Berry, Marie Hojnacki, David C. Kimball, and Beth L. Leech. 2009. Lobbying and Policy Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6. Barone, Michael, and Richard E. Cohen. 2004. Almanac of American Politics. Washington, DC: National Journal Group.
7. Bergan, Daniel E. 2009. ''Does Grassroots Lobbying Work? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effects ofane-Mail Lobbying Campaign on Legislative Behavior.'' American Politics Research 37 (2): 327-52.
8. Denzau, Arthur, and Michael Munger. 1986. ''Legislators and Interest Groups: How Unorganized Interests Get Represented.'' American Political Science Review 80 (1): 89-106.
9. Dewar, Helen, and Amy Goldstein. 2003. ''Medicare Bill Squeezes Through House at Dawn.'' Washington Post, November 23, p. A1.
10. Falk, Leslie. 2003. 'Issue Advertising in the 107 Congress. Annenberg Public Policy Center. www.annenbergpublicpolicycen-ter.org/Downloads/Political- Communication/Leg Issue Ads 107-Congress/2003-APPC-Issue Ads107th.pdf (accessed January 20, 2012).
11. Falk, Leslie, Erin Grizard, and Gordon Mc Donald. 2006. ''Legis-lative Issue Advertising in the 108th Congress: Pluralism or Peril?'' The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 11 (4): 148-64. (Pubitemid 44570960)
12. Fowler, Linda L. 1982. ''How Interest Groups Select Issues for Rating Voting Records of Members of the U.S. Congress.'' Legislative Studies Quarterly 7 (3): 401-17.
13. Freudenheim, Milt. 2003. ''Opponents of Medicare Bill Say AARP Has Conflicts.'' New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/ 2003/1 1/21/business/ opponents-of-medicare-bill-say-aarp-has-conflicts.html (accessed January 20, 2012).
14. Goldstein, Kenneth. 1999. Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Partic-ipation in America. New York: Cambridge.
15. Goldstein, Kenneth. 2001. ''Understanding Interest Group Targeting.'' University of Wisconsin. Typescript.
16. Groenendyk, Eric W., and Nicholas A. Valentino. 2002. ''Of Dark Clouds and Silver Linings: Effects of Exposure to Issue Versus Candidate Advertising on Persuasion, Information Retention, and Issue Salience.'' Communication Research 29 (3): 295-319.
17. Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. 2001. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Hall, Richard L. and Alan V. Deardorff 2006. ''Lobbying as Legislative Subsidy.'' American Political Science Review 100 (1): 69-84.
19. Hansen, John Mark. 1991. Gaining Access. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Hojnacki, Marie, and David Kimball. 1999. ''The Who and How of Organizations' Lobbying Strategies in Committee.'' Journal of Politics 61 (4): 999-1024.
21. Jacobs, Lawrence R. 2001. ''Manipulators and Manipulation: Public Opinion in a Representative Democracy.'' Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 26 (6): 1361-74.
22. Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1994. ''Questioning the Conventional Wisdom on Public Opinion toward Health Reform.'' Political Science and Politics 27 (2): 208-15.
23. Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 2000. Everything You Think You Know About Politics. New York: Basic Books.
24. Kollman, Kenneth. 1998. Outside Lobbying. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
25. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Loomis, Burdett A., and Eric Sexton. 1995. ''Choosing to Advertise: How Interests Decide.'' In Interest Group Politics, ed. Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 193-213.
27. Matthews, Donald. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
28. Mayhew, David. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1974.
29. Miler, Kristina C. 2010. Constituency Representation in Congress: The Viewfrom Capitol Hill. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30. National Annenberg Election Survey. 2000. 2000 National Rolling Cross-Section. http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/ Research Data Sets.aspx (accessed January 20, 2012).
31. Ridout, Travis N. 2009. ''Campaign Microtargeting and the Relevance of the Televised Political Ad.'' The Forum: A Journal of Applied Research in Contemporary Politics 7 (2): Article 5.
32. Rothenberg, Lawrence C. 1992. Linking Citizens to Government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Scherer, Michael. 2010. ''Heated Health-Reform Ads Give Taste of Fall Campaign.'' Time, March 16.
34. Sulkin, Tracy. 2005. Issue Politics in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Valentino, Nicholas A., Vincent L. Hutchings, and Dmitri Williams. 2004. ''The Impact of Political Advertising on Knowledge, Internet Information Seeking, and Candidate Preference.'' Journal of Communication 54 (2): 337-54. (Pubitemid 38728502)
36. Walker, Edward T. 2009. ''Privatizing Participation: Civic Change and the Organizational Dynamic of Grassroots Lobbying Firms.'' American Sociological Review 74 (1):83-105.
37. Wright, John R. 1996. Interest Groups and Congress. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.