Breast cancer screening: Clinical, radiologic, and biochemical

Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 662-670

  Feldman, Elizabeth D ^a   Oppong, Bridget A ^a   Willey, Shawna C ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

breast; cancer; mammography; MRI; screening; ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; BIOCHEMISTRY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; BREAST SELF EXAMINATION; CANCER SCREENING; CYTOLOGY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; NIPPLE ASPIRATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RADIOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; BREAST SELF-EXAMINATION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; THERAPEUTIC IRRIGATION; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84864417999     PISSN: 00099201     EISSN: 15325520     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e31825ca884     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Otto SJ, Fracheboud J, Looman CW, et al. Initiation of population-based mammography screening in Dutch municipalities and effect on breast-cancer mortality: a systematic review. Lancet. 2003;361:1411-1417. (Pubitemid 36515040)
2. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Chen HH, et al. The impact of organized mammography service screening on breast carcinoma mortality in seven Swedish counties. Cancer. 2002;95:458-469. (Pubitemid 34810170)
3. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009151:716-726. W-236.
4. Bancej C, Decker K, Chiarelli A, et al. Contribution of clinical breast examination to mammo-graphy screening in the early detection of breast cancer. J Med Screen. 2003;10:16-21. (Pubitemid 36560963)
5. Chiarelli AM, Majpruz V, Brown P, et al. The contribution of clinical breast examination to the accuracy of breast screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101:1236-1243.
6. Weiss NS. Breast cancer mortality in relation to clinical breast examination and breast self-examination. Breast J. 2003;9 (suppl 2):S86-S89. (Pubitemid 36627152)
7. Roth MY, Elmore JG, Yi-Frazier JP, et al. Self-detection remains a key method of breast cancer detection for U.S. women. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011;20:1135-1139.
8. Thomas DB, Gao DL, Ray RM, et al. Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: final results. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:1445-1457. (Pubitemid 35243743)
9. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mam-mography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1773-1783. (Pubitemid 41549889)
10. Smith RA, Saslow D, Sawyer KA, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast cancer screening: update 2003. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003; 53:141-169. (Pubitemid 36722306)
11. Shen N, Hammonds LS, Madsen D, et al. Mam-mography in 40-year-old women: what difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011; 18:3066-3071.
12. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, et al. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151: 727-737. W237-742.
13. Aragon R, Morgan J, Wong JH, et al. Potential impact of USPSTF recommendations on early diagnosis of breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3137-3142.
14. Sinclair N, Littenberg B, Geller B, et al. Accuracy of screening mammography in older women. Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1268-1273.
15. Wu T, Stewart A, Stanton M, et al. Tomographic mammography using a limited number of low-dose cone-beam projection images. Med Phys. 2003;30:365-380. (Pubitemid 36337103)
16. Niklason LT, Christian BT, Niklason LE, et al. Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology. 1997;205:399-406. (Pubitemid 27467317)
17. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299:2151-2163. (Pubitemid 351679706)
18. Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, et al. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographi-cally dense breasts. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:734-742.
19. Kelly KM, Dean J, Lee SJ, et al. Breast cancer detection: radiologists' performance using mam-mography with and without automated whole-breast ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2557-2564.
20. Bluemke DA, Gatsonis CA, Chen MH, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsy. JAMA. 2004;292:2735-2742. (Pubitemid 39628252)
21. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75-89. (Pubitemid 46535708)
22. Palmedo H, Biersack HJ, Lastoria S, et al. Scinti-mammography with technetium-99m methoxy-isobutylisonitrile: results of a prospective European multicentre trial. Eur J Nucl Med. 1998;25: 375-385. (Pubitemid 28211601)
23. Mekhmandarov S, Sandbank J, Cohen M, et al. Technetium-99m-MIBI scintimammography in palpable and nonpalpable breast lesions. J Nucl Med. 1998;39:86-91. (Pubitemid 28063176)
24. Allen MW, Hendi P, Schwimmer J, et al. Decision analysis for the cost effectiveness of sestamibi scintimammography in minimizing unnecessary biopsies. Q J Nucl Med. 2000;44:168-185. (Pubitemid 30623522)
25. Thompson CJ, Murthy K, Weinberg IN, et al. Feasibility study for positron emission mammo-graphy. Med Phys. 1994;21:529-538. (Pubitemid 24129931)
26. Murthy K, Aznar M, Thompson CJ, et al. Results of preliminary clinical trials of the positron emission mammography system PEM-I: a dedicated breast imaging system producing glucose metabolic images using FDG. J Nucl Med. 2000;41: 1851-1858.
27. Berg WA, Weinberg IN, Narayanan D, et al. High-resolution fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomographywithcompression("positron emission mammography") is highly accurate in depicting primary breast cancer. Breast J. 2006;12:309-323. (Pubitemid 43989975)
28. O'Connor MK, Li H, Rhodes DJ, et al. Comparison of radiation exposure and associated radiation-induced cancer risks from mammography and molecular imaging of the breast. Med Phys. 2010;37:6187-6198.
29. Page DL, Jensen RA. Evaluation and management of high risk and premalignant lesions of the breast. World J Surg. 1994;18:32-38. (Pubitemid 24100690)
30. Masood S, Frykberg ER, McLellan GL, et al. Prospective evaluation of radiologically directed fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions. Cancer. 1990;66:1480-1487. (Pubitemid 20355413)
31. Fabian CJ, Kimler BF, Zalles CM, et al. Short-term breast cancer prediction by random peri-areolar fine-needle aspiration cytology and the Gail risk model. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92: 1217-1227. (Pubitemid 30627730)
32. Wrensch MR, Petrakis NL, King EB, et al. Breast cancer incidence in women with abnormal cytology in nipple aspirates of breast fluid. Am J Epidemiol. 1992;135:130-141.
33. Gauthier ML, Berman HK, Miller C, et al. Abrogated response to cellular stress identifies DCIS associated with subsequent tumor events and defines basal-like breast tumors. Cancer cell. 2007;12:479-491. (Pubitemid 350046408)