Mammography in 40-year-old women: What difference does it make? The potential impact of the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) mammography guidelines

Annals of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 18, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 3066-3071

  Shen, Nicole ^a   Hammonds, Linda Sue ^a   Madsen, Dick ^a   Dale, Paul ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE FREE SURVIVAL; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL RECORD; OVERALL SURVIVAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENTINEL LYMPH NODE; SURVIVAL TIME;

ADULT; ADVISORY COMMITTEES; AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 84860391801     PISSN: 10689265     EISSN: 15344681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2009-4     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. American Cancer Society. What are the key statistics about breast cancer? 2011. Available: www.cancer.org/Cancer/BreastCancer/DetailedGuide/breast- cancer-key-statistics [accessed January 3, 2011].
2. Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen HH, Yen MF, Duffy SW, Smith RA. Beyond randomized controlled trials: organized mammographic screening substantially reduces breast carcinoma mortality. Cancer. 2001;91:1724-31.
3. Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:727-37, W237-742.
4. Screening for breast cancer: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:716-726, W-236.
5. Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137(5 Part 1):344):344-6.
6. Briss P, Rimer B, Reilley B, Coates RC, Lee NC, Mullen P, et al. Promoting informed decisions about cancer screening in communities and healthcare systems. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:67-80.
7. Ichikawa LE, Barlow WE, Anderson ML, Taplin SH, Geller BM, Brenner RJ. Time trends in radiologists' interpretive performance at screening mammography from the community-based Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium, 1996-2004. Radiology. 2010;256:74-82.
8. Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology. 2011;258:98-105.
9. Gibson CJ, Weiss J, Goodrich M, Onega T. False-positive mammography and depressed mood in a screening population: findings from the New Hampshire Mammography Network. J Public Health (Oxf). 2009;31:554-60.
10. Hendrick RE, Helvie MA. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196: W112-116.
11. Cady B, Michaelson JS, Chung MA. The "tipping point" for breast cancer mortality decline has resulted from size reductions due to mammographic screening. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:903-6.
12. American Cancer Society. Breast Cancer Facts and Figures 2009-2010. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, Inc. 2009.
13. Spencer DB, Potter JE, Chung MA, Fulton J, Hebert W, Cady B. Mammographic screening and disease presentation of breast cancer patients who die of disease. Breast J. 2004;10:298-303.
14. Jorgensen KJ, Zahl PH, Gotzsche PC. Breast cancer mortality in organised mammography screening in Denmark: comparative study. BMJ. 2010;340: c1241.