Plant 'evo-devo' goes genomic: From candidate genes to regulatory networks

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 441-447

  de Bruijn, Suzanne ^a   Angenent, Gerco C ^a   Kaufmann, Kerstin ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANT DNA;

CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; FLOWER; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GENE; REGULATORY SEQUENCE; REVIEW;

CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; DNA, PLANT; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FLOWERS; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; GENE REGULATORY NETWORKS; GENES, PLANT; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANTS; REGULATORY ELEMENTS, TRANSCRIPTIONAL; TRANSCRIPTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84864393544     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.05.002     Document Type: Review

References (70)

1. Vergara-Silva F. Plants and the conceptual articulation of evolutionary developmental biology. Biol. Philos. 2003, 18:249-284.
2. Theissen G., et al. A short history of MADS-box genes in plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 42:115-149.
3. Rosin F.M., Kramer E.M. Old dogs, new tricks: regulatory evolution in conserved genetic modules leads to novel morphologies in plants. Dev. Biol. 2009, 332:25-35.
4. Cronk Q., Ojeda I. Bird-pollinated flowers in an evolutionary and molecular context. J Exp Bot 2008, 59:715-727.
5. Wu C.A., et al. Mimulus is an emerging model system for the integration of ecological and genomic studies. Heredity 2008, 100:220-230.
6. Mackay T.F.C., et al. The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:565-577.
7. Sicard A., et al. Genetics, evolution, and adaptive significance of the selfing syndrome in the genus Capsella. Plant Cell 2011, 23:3156-3171.
8. Schemske D.W., Bradshaw H.D. Pollinator preference and the evolution of floral traits in monkeyflowers (Mimulus). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96:11910-11915.
9. Joosen R.V., et al. Advances in genetical genomics of plants. Curr. Genomics 2009, 10:540-549.
10. Lee E.K., et al. A functional phylogenomic view of the seed plants. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002411.
11. Jiao Y., et al. Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature 2011, 473:97-100.
12. Gan X., et al. Multiple reference genomes and transcriptomes for Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 2011, 477:419-423.
13. Hu T.T., et al. The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:476-481.
14. Cao J., et al. Whole-genome sequencing of multiple Arabidopsis thaliana populations. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:956-963.
15. Yant L. Genome-wide mapping of transcription factor binding reveals developmental process integration and a fresh look at evolutionary dynamics. Am. J. Bot. 2012, 99:277-290.
16. Carroll S.B. Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution. Cell 2008, 134:25-36.
17. Wittkopp P.J., Kalay G. Cis-regulatory elements: molecular mechanisms and evolutionary processes underlying divergence. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:59-69.
18. Park S.J., et al. Rate of meristem maturation determines inflorescence architecture in tomato. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:639-644.
19. Kanno A., et al. Heterotopic expression of class B floral homeotic genes supports a modified ABC model for tulip (Tulipa gesneriana). Plant Mol. Biol. 2003, 52:831-841.
20. He C., Saedler H. Heterotopic expression of MPF2 is the key to the evolution of the Chinese lantern of Physalis, a morphological novelty in Solanaceae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:5779-5784.
21. Moyroud E., et al. Prediction of regulatory interactions from genome sequences using a biophysical model for the Arabidopsis LEAFY transcription factor. Plant Cell 2011, 23:1293-1306.
22. Weirauch M.T., Hughes T.R. Conserved expression without conserved regulatory sequence: the more things change, the more they stay the same. Trends Genet. 2010, 26:66-74.
23. Stern D.L., Orgogozo V. Is genetic evolution predictable?. Science 2009, 323:746-751.
24. Stern D.L., Orgogozo V. The loci of evolution: how predictable is genetic evolution?. Evolution 2008, 62:2155-2177.
25. Jones F.C., et al. The genomic basis of adaptive evolution in threespine sticklebacks. Nature 2012, 484:55-61.
26. Doebley J.F., et al. The molecular genetics of crop domestication. Cell 2006, 127:1309-1321.
27. Chen K.Y., et al. Changes in regulation of a transcription factor lead to autogamy in cultivated tomatoes. Science 2007, 318:643-645.
28. Konishi S., et al. An SNP caused loss of seed shattering during rice domestication. Science 2006, 312:1392-1396.
29. Studer A., et al. Identification of a functional transposon insertion in the maize domestication gene tb1. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:1160-1163.
30. Hay A., Tsiantis M. The genetic basis for differences in leaf form between Arabidopsis thaliana and its wild relative Cardamine hirsuta. Nat. Genet. 2006, 38:942-947.
31. Uchida N., et al. Regulation of SHOOT MERISTEMLESS genes via an upstream-conserved noncoding sequence coordinates leaf development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:15953-15958.
32. Bharathan G., et al. Homologies in leaf form inferred from KNOXI gene expression during development. Science 2002, 296:1858-1860.
33. Arnaud N., et al. The same regulatory point mutation changed seed-dispersal structures in evolution and domestication. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1215-1219.
34. Chan Y.F., et al. Adaptive evolution of pelvic reduction in sticklebacks by recurrent deletion of a Pitx1 enhancer. Science 2010, 327:302-305.
35. Rebeiz M., et al. Evolutionary origin of a novel gene expression pattern through co-option of the latent activities of existing regulatory sequences. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10036-10043.
36. Prud'homme B., et al. Emerging principles of regulatory evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104(Suppl. 1):8605-8612.
37. Li X.Y., et al. Transcription factors bind thousands of active and inactive regions in the Drosophila blastoderm. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e27.
38. Schmidt D., et al. Five-vertebrate ChIP-seq reveals the evolutionary dynamics of transcription factor binding. Science 2010, 328:1036-1040.
39. Brady S.M., et al. A stele-enriched gene regulatory network in the Arabidopsis root. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2011, 7:459.
40. Hesselberth J.R., et al. Global mapping of protein-DNA interactions in vivo by digital genomic footprinting. Nat. Methods 2009, 6:283-289.
41. Degner J.F., et al. DNase I sensitivity QTLs are a major determinant of human expression variation. Nature 2012, 482:390-394.
42. Li X.Y., et al. The role of chromatin accessibility in directing the widespread, overlapping patterns of Drosophila transcription factor binding. Genome Biol. 2011, 12:R34.
43. He Q., et al. High conservation of transcription factor binding and evidence for combinatorial regulation across six Drosophila species. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:414-420.
44. Tuch B.B., et al. The evolution of combinatorial gene regulation in fungi. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:352-364.
45. Brawand D., et al. The evolution of gene expression levels in mammalian organs. Nature 2011, 478:343-348.
46. Becker A., Lange M. VIGS: genomics goes functional. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 15:1-4.
47. Deal R.B., Henikoff S. A simple method for gene expression and chromatin profiling of individual cell types within a tissue. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:1030-1040.
48. Birnbaum K., et al. A gene expression map of the Arabidopsis root. Science 2003, 302:1956-1960.
49. Torti S., et al. Analysis of the Arabidopsis shoot meristem transcriptome during floral transition identifies distinct regulatory patterns and a leucine-rich repeat protein that promotes flowering. Plant Cell 2012, 24:444-462.
50. Pasquinelli A.E. MicroRNAs and their targets: recognition, regulation and an emerging reciprocal relationship. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13:271-282.
51. Davidson E.H., Erwin D.H. Gene regulatory networks and the evolution of animal body plans. Science 2006, 311:796-800.
52. Kaufmann K., et al. Regulation of transcription in plants: mechanisms controlling developmental switches. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010, 11:830-842.
53. Hay A., Tsiantis M. KNOX genes: versatile regulators of plant development and diversity. Development 2010, 137:3153-3165.
54. Busch A., Zachgo S. Flower symmetry evolution: towards understanding the abominable mystery of angiosperm radiation. Bioessays 2009, 31:1181-1190.
55. Preston J.C., Hileman L.C. Developmental genetics of floral symmetry evolution. Trends Plant Sci. 2009, 14:147-154.
56. Busch A., et al. Corolla monosymmetry: evolution of a morphological novelty in the Brassicaceae family. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012, 29:1241-1254.
57. Busch A., Zachgo S. Control of corolla monosymmetry in the Brassicaceae Iberis amara. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:16714-16719.
58. Theissen G., Melzer R. Molecular mechanisms underlying origin and diversification of the angiosperm flower. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100:603-619.
59. Kaufmann K., et al. Orchestration of floral initiation by APETALA1. Science 2010, 328:85-89.
60. Kaufmann K., et al. Target genes of the MADS transcription factor SEPALLATA3: integration of developmental and hormonal pathways in the Arabidopsis flower. PLoS Biol. 2009, 7:e1000090.
61. Maizel A., et al. The floral regulator LEAFY evolves by substitutions in the DNA binding domain. Science 2005, 308:260-263.
62. Calonje M., et al. Floral meristem identity genes are expressed during tendril development in grapevine. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135:1491-1501.
63. Domazet-Loso T., Tautz D. A phylogenetically based transcriptome age index mirrors ontogenetic divergence patterns. Nature 2010, 468:815-818.
64. Kalinka A.T., et al. Gene expression divergence recapitulates the developmental hourglass model. Nature 2010, 468:811-814.
65. Chanderbali A.S., et al. Conservation and canalization of gene expression during angiosperm diversification accompany the origin and evolution of the flower. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:22570-22575.
66. Zahn L.M., et al. Comparative transcriptomics among floral organs of the basal eudicot Eschscholzia californica as reference for floral evolutionary developmental studies. Genome Biol. 2010, 11:R101.
67. Kaufmann K., et al. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) of plant transcription factors followed by sequencing (ChIP-SEQ) or hybridization to whole genome arrays (ChIP-CHIP). Nat. Protoc. 2010, 5:457-472.
68. Wang Z., et al. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:57-63.
69. Wang J., et al. In vitro DNA-binding profile of transcription factors: methods and new insights. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 210:15-27.
70. Pique-Regi R., et al. Accurate inference of transcription factor binding from DNA sequence and chromatin accessibility data. Genome Res. 2010, 21:447-455.