Utilization of case presentations in medical microbiology to enhance relevance of basic science for medical students

Medical Education Online

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Chamberlain, Neal R ^a   Stuart, Melissa K ^a   Singh, Vineet K ^a   Sargentini, Neil J ^a  

^a A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Basic science; Case presentations; Critical thinking; Microbiology

Indexed keywords

ANAMNESIS; ARTICLE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; TEACHING;

CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY TAKING; MICROBIOLOGY; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; TEACHING;

EID: 84864389185     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10872981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3402/meo.v17i0.15943     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Southwick F, Katona P, Kauffman C, Monroe S, Pirofski LA, del Rio C, Gallis H, Dismukes W. Commentary: IDSA guidelines for improving the teaching of preclinical medical microbiology and infectious diseases. Acad Med 2010; 85: 19-22.
2. Woods NN. Science is fundamental: the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning. Med Educ 2007; 41: 1173-7.
3. Woods NN, Neville AJ, Levinson AJ, Howey EH, Oczkowski WJ, Norman GR. The value of basic science in clinical diagnosis. Acad Med 2006; 81: S124-7.
4. Bordage G. Prototypes and semantic qualifiers: from past to present. Med Educ 2007; 41: 1117-21.
5. Bowen JL. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2217-25.
6. Koens F, Mann KV, Custers EJ, Ten Cate OT. Analysing the concept of context in medical education. Med Educ 2005; 39: 1243-9.
7. Prince KJ, Van De Wiel M, Scherpbier AJ, Can Der Vleuten CP, Boshuizen HP. A Qualitative Analysis of the Transition from Theory to Practice in Undergraduate Training in a PBL-Medical School. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2000; 5: 105-16.
8. Lockwood MD, Tucker-Potter S, Sargentini NJ. Curricular analysis of competency-based osteopathic medical education: application of a matrix for quality enhancement to a standardized patient encounter example. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2009; 109: p. 486-500.
9. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. Piscataway, NJ: Aldine Transaction; 1967, p. 110-115.
10. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publication; 2006.
11. Bohay M, Blakely DP, Tamplin AK, Radvansky GA. Note taking, review, memory, and comprehension. Am J Psychol 2011; 124: 63-73.
12. Graffam B. Active learning in medical education: strategies for beginning implementation. Med Teach 2007; 29: 38-42.
13. Flannelly LT. Using feedback to reduce students' judgment bias on test questions. J Nurs Educ 2001; 40: 10-6.
14. Gregory A, Walker I, McLaughlin K, Peets AD. Both preparing to teach and teaching positively impact learning outcomes for peer teachers. Med Teach 2011; 33: e417-22.
15. Evans DJ, Cuffe T. Near-peer teaching in anatomy: an approach for deeper learning. Anat Sci Educ 2009; 2: 227-33.
16. Maddow CL, Shah MN, Olsen J, Cook S, Howes DS. Efficient communication: assessment-oriented oral case presentation. Acad Emerg Med 2003; 10: 842-7.
17. Onishi H. Role of case presentation for teaching and learning activities. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2008; 24: 356-60.