Development and validation of an assessment instrument for teaching evidence-based practice to students in allied health care: The Dutch modified Fresno

Journal of Allied Health

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 77-82

  Spek, B ^a   De Wolf, G S ^b   Van Dijk, N ^b   Lucas, C ^b  

^a HANZE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; EDUCATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; PARAMEDICAL PERSONNEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; VALIDATION STUDY;

ALLIED HEALTH PERSONNEL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84864344281     PISSN: 00907421     EISSN: 1945404X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Evidence-Based Practice Centers. Synthesizing scientific evidence to improve quality and effectiveness in health care. Available at: http://www.ahrq.gov/ clinic/epc/. Accessed Dec 2010.
2. World Health Organization. The WHO Agenda, 4. Harnessing research, information and evidence. Available at: http://www.who.int/about/agenda/en/. Accessed Dec 2010.
3. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, et al. Sicily statement on evidence- based practice. BMC Med Educ 2005 Jan 5;5(1):1.
4. Taylor R, Reeves B, Mears R, et al. Development and validation of a questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness of evidence-based practice teaching. Med Educ 2001;35(6):544-547. (Pubitemid 32655590)
5. Khan KS, Awonuga AO, Dwarakanath LS, Taylor R. Assessments in evidence-based medicine workshops: loose connection between perception of knowledge and its objective assessment. Med Teach 2001; 23(1):92-94. (Pubitemid 32054695)
6. Reed D, Price EG, Windish DM, et al. Challenges in systematic reviews of educational intervention studies. Ann Intern Med 2005;142(12 Pt 2):1080-1089. (Pubitemid 40847711)
7. Guyatt GH, Deyo RA, Charlson M, et al. Responsiveness and validity in health status measurement: a clarification. J Clin Epidemiol 1989;42(5):403-408. (Pubitemid 19165904)
8. Johnston JM, Leung GM, Fielding R, et al. The development and validation of a knowledge, attitude and behaviour questionnaire to assess undergraduate evidence-based practice teaching and learning. Med Educ 2003;37(11):992-1000. (Pubitemid 37411931)
9. Ramos KD, Schafer S, Tracz SM. Validation of the fresno test of competence in evidence based medicine. BMJ 2003;326(7384): 319-321. (Pubitemid 36205166)
10. Coomarasamy A, Taylor R, Khan KS. A systematic review of postgraduate teaching in evidence-based medicine and critical appraisal. Med Teach 2003;25(1):77-81. (Pubitemid 36114067)
11. Shaneyfelt T, Baum KD, Bell D, et al. Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice: a systematic review. JAMA 2006;296(9):1116-27. (Pubitemid 44343531)
12. Ilic D. Assessing competency in evidence based practice: strengths and limitations of current tools in practice. BMC Med Educ 2009;9:53.
13. McCluskey A, Bishop B. The adapted fresno test of competence in evidence-based practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 2009;29(2): 119-26.
14. Argimon-Pallas JM, Flores-Mateo G, Jimenez-Villa J, Pujol-Ribera E. Psychometric properties of a test in evidence-based practice: the spanish version of the fresno test. BMC Med Educ 2010;10(45).
15. Tilson JK. Validation of the modified fresno test: assessing physical therapists' evidence based practice knowledge and skills. BMC Med Educ 2010;10(1):38.
16. Dijksterhuis MG, Scheele F, Schuwirth LW, et al. Progress testing in postgraduate medical education. Med Teach 2009;31(10):e464-e468.
17. Creswell JW, Fetters MD, Ivankova NV. Designing a mixed methods study in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(1):7-12. (Pubitemid 39318013)
18. Creswell JW. Mixed Methods Designs. Educational Research. Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merill-Pearson Education; 2008, p 551-595.
19. Linstone HA, Turoffs M. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Available at: http://is.njit.edu/pubs/delphibook/. Accessed Nov 2009.
20. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
21. Lynn MR. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res 1986;35(6):382-385. (Pubitemid 17184381)
22. Bonett DG. Sample size requirements for estimating intraclass correlations with desired precision. Stat Med 2002;21(9):1331-1335. (Pubitemid 34467237)
23. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research. Applications to Practice. 3 ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education; 2009.
24. Terwee C, Dekker F, Bossuyt P. A taxonomy for responsiveness? J Clin Epidemiol 2002;55(11):1156.
25. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN, Wright JG. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54(12):1204-1217. (Pubitemid 34002973)
26. Coe R. It's the Effect Size, Stupid. What effect size is and why it is important. School of Education, University of Durham. Available at: http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm. Accessed May 2010.
27. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
28. Kim S, Phillips WR, Pinsky L, et al. A conceptual framework for developing teaching cases: a review and synthesis of the literature across disciplines. Med Educ 2006;40(9):867-876. (Pubitemid 44272761)