Estimating indirect genetic effects: Precision of estimates and optimum designs

Genetics

Volumn 186, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1013-1028

  Bijma, Piter ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; COVARIANCE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; GENETIC ANALYSIS; HEREDITY; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; HUMANS; MODELS, GENETIC; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 78951488357     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 00166731     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.110.120493     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Agrawal, A. F., E. D. Brodie, III and M. J. Wade, 2001 On indirect genetic effects in structured populations. Am. Nat. 158: 308-323.
2. Arango, J., I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, M. Cubertson and W. Herring, 2005 Estimation of variance components including competitive effects of Large White growing gilts. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 1241-1246.
3. Bergsma, R., E. Kanis, E. F. Knol and P. Bijma, 2008 The contribution of social effects to heritable variation in finishing traits of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Genetics 178: 1559-1570.
4. Bijma, P., 2010 Multilevel selection 4: modeling the relationship of indirect genetic effects and group size. Genetics 186: 1029-1031.
5. Bijma, P., and M. J. Wade, 2008 The joint effects of kin, multilevel selection and indirect genetic effects on response to genetic selection. J. Evol. Biol. 21: 1175-1188.
6. Bijma, P., W. M. Muir and J. A. M. van Arendonk, 2007a Multilevel selection 1: quantitative genetics of inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175: 277-288.
7. Bijma, P., W. M. Muir, E. D. Ellen, J. B. Wolf and J. A. M. van Arendonk, 2007b Multilevel selection 2: estimating the genetic parameters determining inheritance and response to selection. Genetics 175: 289-299.
8. Bleakley, B. H., and E. D. Brodie, III, 2009 Indirect genetic effects influence antipredator behavior in guppies: estimates of the coefficient of interaction psi and the inheritance of reciprocity. Evolution 63: 1796-1806.
9. Canario, L., N. Lundeheim and P. Bijma, 2010 Pig growth is affected by social genetic effects and social litter effects that depend on group size. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. German Society of Animal Science, Leipzig, Germany, p. 87.
10. Cantet, R. J. C., and E. P. Cappa, 2008 On identifiability of (co)variance components in animal models with competition effects. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 125: 371-381.
11. Cappa, E. P., and R. J. C. Cantet, 2008 Direct and competition additive effects in tree breeding: Bayesian estimation from an individual mixed tree model. Silvae Genet. 57: 45-57.
12. Chen, C. Y., S. D. Kachman, R. K. Johnson, S. Newman and L. D. Van Vleck, 2008 Estimation of genetic parameters for average daily gain using models with competition effects. J. Anim. Sci. 86: 2525-2530.
13. Chenoweth, S. F., H. D. Rundle and M. W. Blows, 2010 Experimental evidence for the evolution of indirect genetic effects: changes in the interaction effect coefficient, Ψ, due to sexual selection. Evolution 64: 1849-1856.
14. Cheverud, J. M., 1984 Evolution by kin selection: a quantitative genetic model illustrated by maternal performance in mice. Evolution 38: 766-777.
15. Cheverud, J. M., and A. J. Moore, 1994 Quantitative genetics and the role of the environment provided by relatives in the evolution of behavior, pp. 60-100 in Quantitative Genetic Studies of Behavioral Evolution, edited by C. R. B. Boake. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
16. Clutton-Brock, T. H., 2002 Breeding together: kin selection, reciprocity and mutualism in cooperative animal societies. Nature 373: 209-216.
17. Darwin, C., 1859 On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life, Ed.1. John Murray, London.
18. Dickerson, G. E., 1947 Composition of hog carcasses as influenced by heritable differences in rate and economy of gain. Iowa Agric. Exp. Stn. Res. Bull. 354: 492-524.
19. Ellen, E. D., J. Visscher, J. A. M. van Arendonk and P. Bijma, 2008 Survival of laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and associative effects in three purebred layer lines. Poultry Sci. 87: 233-239.
20. Emik, L. O., and C. E. Terril, 1949 Systematic procedures for calculating inbreeding coefficients. J. Hered. 40: 51-55.
21. Falconer, D. S., 1965 Maternal effects and selection response, pp. 763-774 in Genetics Today, Proceedings of the XIth International Congress on Genetics, Vol. 3, edited by S. J. Geerts. Pergamon, Oxford.
22. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay, 1996 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Pearson Education, Harlow, UK.
23. Frank, S. A., 1998 Foundations of Social Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
24. Gilmour, A. R., B. J. Gogel, B. R. Cullis and R. Thompson, 2006 ASReml User Guide, Release 2.0, VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
25. Griffing, B., 1967 Selection in reference to biological groups. I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 20: 127-142.
26. Griffing, B., 1976 Selection in reference to biological groups. VI. Analysis of full sib groups. Genetics 82: 723-731.
27. Griffing, B., 1981a A theory of natural-selection incorporating interaction among individuals. 1. The modeling process. J. Theor. Biol. 89: 635-658.
28. Griffing, B., 1981b A theory of natural-selection incorporating interaction among individuals. 2. Use of related groups. J. Theor. Biol. 89: 659-677.
29. Hadfield, J. D., and A. J. Wilson, 2007 Multilevel selection 3: modeling the effects of interacting individuals as a function of group size. Genetics 177: 667-668.
30. Hamilton, W. D., 1964 The genetical evolution of social behavior. J. Theor. Biol. 7: 1-52.
31. Henderson, C. R., 1976 A simple method for the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32: 69-83.
32. Hsu, W. L., R. K. Johnson and L. D. VanVleck, 2010 Effect of pen mates on growth, backfat depth, and longissimus muscle area of swine. J. Anim. Sci. 88: 895-902.
33. Keller, L., 1999 Levels of Selection in Evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
34. Kirkpatrick, M., and R. Lande, 1989 The evolution of maternal characters. Evolution 43: 485-503.
35. Kruuk, L. E. B., 2004 Estimating genetic parameters in natural populations using the 'animal model.' Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 359: 873-890.
36. Lynch, M., and B. Walsh, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
37. McGlothlin, J. W., and E. D. Brodie, III, 2009 How to measure indirect genetic effects: the congruence of trait-based and variance-partitioning approaches. Evolution 63: 1785-1795.
38. McGlothlin, J. W., A. J. Moore, J. B. Wolf and E. D. Brodie, III, 2010 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process. III. Social evolution. Evolution 64: 2558-2574.
39. Moore, A. J., E. D. Brodie, III and J. B. Wolf, 1997 Interacting phenotypes and the evolutionary process: I. Direct and indirect genetic effects of social interactions. Evolution 51: 1352-1362.
40. Mousseau, T. A., and C.W. Fox, eds., 1998 Maternal effects as adaptations. Oxford University Press, New York.
41. Muir, W. M., 1996 Group selection for adaptation to multiple-hen cages: selection program and direct responses. Poult. Sci. 75: 447-458.
42. Muir,W. M., 2005 Incorporation of competitive effects in forest tree or animal breeding programs. Genetics 170: 1247-1259.
43. Muir, W. M., and A. Schinckel, 2002 Incorporation of competitive effects in breeding programs to improve productivity and animal well being. Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France, communication no. 14-07.
44. Muir, W. M., P. Bijma, C. Y. Chen, I. Misztal and M. J. Wade, 2010 Advances in selection theory including experimental demonstrations: the theory of selection with social competition. Proceedings of the 9th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production. German Society of Animal Science, Leipzig, Germany, p. 141.
45. Mutic, J. J., and J. B. Wolf, 2007 Indirect genetic effects from ecological interactions in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Ecol. 16: 2371-2381.
46. Patterson, H. D., and R. Thompson, 1971 Recovery of interblock information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545-554.
47. Petfield, D., S. F. Chenoweth, H. D. Rundle and M. W. Blows, 2005 Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 6045-6050.
48. Robertson, A., 1959 Experimental design in the evaluation of genetic parameters. Biometrics 15: 219-226.
49. Stuart, A., and J. K. Ord, 1994 Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 1, Distribution Theory. Hodder Education, London.
50. Stuart, A., J. K. Ord and S. Arnold, 1999 Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics, Vol. 2A, Classical Inference and the Linear Model, Ed.6. Arnold, London.
51. Van Vleck, L. D., and J. P. Cassady, 2004 Modification of MTDFREML to estimate variance due to genetic competition effects. J. Anim. Sci. 82(Suppl. 2): 38 (Abstr.).
52. Van Vleck, L. D., and J. P. Cassady, 2005 Unexpected estimates of variance components with a true model containing genetic competition effects. J. Anim. Sci. 83: 68-74.
53. Willham, R. L., 1963 The covariance between relatives for characters composed of components contributed by related individuals. Biometrics 19: 18-27.
54. Wilson, A. J., U. Gelin, M-C. Perron and D. Réale, 2009 Indirect genetic effects and the evolution of aggression in a vertebrate system. Proc. R. Soc. B 276: 533-541.
55. Wilson, E. O., 1975 Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
56. Wolf, J. B., E. D. Brodie, III, A. J. Cheverud, A. J. Moore and M. J. Wade, 1998 Evolutionary consequences of indirect genetic effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13: 64-69.