Two-dimensional spatial patterning in developmental systems

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 438-446

  Torii, Keiko U ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Activator inhibitor model; Cell cell interaction; Fish skin stripes; Lateral inhibition; Leaf epidermis; Reaction diffusion model

Indexed keywords

BASIC HELIX LOOP HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR; LIGAND; NOTCH RECEPTOR;

ACHAETE SCUTE COMPLEX; APICAL MERISTEM; APOPTOSIS; ARABIDOPSIS; CELL INTERACTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL TYPE; CELL WALL; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DIFFUSION; DROSOPHILA; LASER SURGERY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MELANOPHORE; NEUROECTODERM; NONHUMAN; PLANT CELL; PLANT EPIDERMIS; PLANT STOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REVIEW; TRICHOME; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PLANT CELLS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 84864315765     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2012.06.002     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Turing A.M. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. Sci. 1952, 237:37-72.
2. Gierer A., Meinhardt H. A theory of biological patten formation. Kybernetik 1972, 12:30-39.
3. Kondo S., Miura T. Reaction-diffusion model as a framework for understanding biological pattern formation. Science 2010, 329:1616-1620.
4. Meinhardt H., Gierer A. Pattern formation by local self-activation and lateral inhibition. Bioessays 2000, 22:753-760.
5. Kondo S., Asai R. A reaction-diffusion wave on the skin of the marine angelfish Pomacanthus. Nature 1995, 376:765-768.
6. Miyazawa S., et al. Blending of animal colour patterns by hybridization. Nat. Commun. 2010, 1:66.
7. Parichy D.M. Pigment patterns: fish in stripes and spots. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:R947-R950.
8. Quigley I.K., Parichy D.M. Pigment pattern formation in zebrafish: a model for developmental genetics and the evolution of form. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2002, 58:442-455.
9. Yamaguchi M., et al. Pattern regulation in the stripe of zebrafish suggests an underlying dynamic and autonomous mechanism. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:4790-4793.
10. Nakamasu A., et al. Interactions between zebrafish pigment cells responsible for the generation of Turing patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:8429-8434.
11. Parichy D.M., et al. Zebrafish sparse corresponds to an orthologue of c-kit and is required for the morphogenesis of a subpopulation of melanocytes, but is not essential for hematopoiesis or primordial germ cell development. Development 1999, 126:3425-3436.
12. Parichy D.M., Turner J.M. Temporal and cellular requirements for Fms signaling during zebrafish adult pigment pattern development. Development 2003, 130:817-833.
13. Iwashita M., et al. Pigment pattern in jaguar/obelix zebrafish is caused by a Kir7.1 mutation: implications for the regulation of melanosome movement. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:e197.
14. Inaba M., et al. Pigment pattern formation by contact-dependent depolarization. Science 2012, 335:677.
15. Artavanis-Tsakonas S., et al. Notch signaling: cell fate control and signal integration in development. Science 1999, 284:770-776.
16. Sestan N., et al. Contact-dependent inhibition of cortical neurite growth mediated by notch signaling. Science 1999, 286:741-746.
17. Heitzler P., Simpson P. The choice of cell fate in the epidermis of Drosophila. Cell 1991, 64:1083-1092.
18. Collier J.R., et al. Pattern formation by lateral inhibition with feedback: a mathematical model of delta-notch intercellular signalling. J. Theor. Biol. 1996, 183:429-446.
19. Meir E., et al. Robustness, flexibility, and the role of lateral inhibition in the neurogenic network. Curr. Biol. 2002, 12:778-786.
20. Shimojo H., et al. Oscillations in notch signaling regulate maintenance of neural progenitors. Neuron 2008, 58:52-64.
21. Sprinzak D., et al. Cis-interactions between Notch and Delta generate mutually exclusive signalling states. Nature 2010, 465:86-90.
22. de Celis J.F., Bray S. Feed-back mechanisms affecting Notch activation at the dorsoventral boundary in the Drosophila wing. Development 1997, 124:3241-3251.
23. Micchelli C.A., et al. The function and regulation of cut expression on the wing margin of Drosophila: Notch, Wingless and a dominant negative role for Delta and Serrate. Development 1997, 124:1485-1495.
24. Sakamoto K., et al. Intracellular cell-autonomous association of Notch and its ligands: a novel mechanism of Notch signal modification. Dev. Biol. 2002, 241:313-326.
25. Miller A.C., et al. cis-Inhibition of Notch by endogenous Delta biases the outcome of lateral inhibition. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:1378-1383.
26. Kageyama R., et al. Dynamic Notch signaling in neural progenitor cells and a revised view of lateral inhibition. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 11:1247-1251.
27. Bergmann D.C., Sack F.D. Stomatal development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2007, 58:163-181.
28. Pillitteri L.J., Torii K.U. Mechanisms of stomatal development. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2012, 63:591-614.
29. Hulskamp M. Plant trichomes: a model for cell differentiation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5:471-480.
30. Serna L., Martin C. Trichomes: different regulatory networks lead to convergent structures. Trends Plant Sci. 2006, 11:274-280.
31. Peterson K.M., et al. Out of the mouths of plants: the molecular basis of the evolution and diversity of stomatal development. Plant Cell 2010, 22:296-306.
32. Ohashi-Ito K., Bergmann D.C. Arabidopsis FAMA controls the final proliferation/differentiation switch during stomatal development. Plant Cell 2006, 18:2493-2505.
33. MacAlister C.A., et al. Transcription factor control of asymmetric cell divisions that establish the stomatal lineage. Nature 2007, 445:537-540.
34. Pillitteri L.J., et al. Termination of asymmetric cell division and differentiation of stomata. Nature 2007, 445:501-505.
35. Kanaoka M.M., et al. SCREAM/ICE1 and SCREAM2 specify three cell-state transitional steps leading to Arabidopsis stomatal differentiation. Plant Cell 2008, 20:1775-1785.
36. Lai L.B., et al. The Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB proteins FOUR LIPS and MYB88 restrict divisions late in the stomatal cell lineage. Plant Cell 2005, 17:2754-2767.
37. Pillitteri L.J., Torii K.U. Breaking the silence: three bHLH proteins direct cell-fate decisions during stomatal development. Bioessays 2007, 29:861-870.
38. Hara K., et al. The secretory peptide gene EPF1 enforces the stomatal one-cell-spacing rule. Genes Dev. 2007, 21:1720-1725.
39. Nadeau J.A., Sack F.D. Control of stomatal distribution on the Arabidopsis leaf surface. Science 2002, 296:1697-1700.
40. Hunt L., Gray J.E. The signaling peptide EPF2 controls asymmetric cell divisions during stomatal development. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:864-869.
41. Hara K., et al. Epidermal cell density is autoregulated via a secretory peptide, EPIDERMAL PATTERNING FACTOR 2 in Arabidopsis leaves. Plant Cell Physiol. 2009, 50:1019-1031.
42. Shpak E.D., et al. Stomatal patterning and differentiation by synergistic interactions of receptor kinases. Science 2005, 309:290-293.
43. Wang H., et al. Stomatal development and patterning are regulated by environmentally responsive mitogen-activated protein kinases in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2007, 19:63-73.
44. Bergmann D.C., et al. Stomatal development and pattern controlled by a MAPKK kinase. Science 2004, 304:1494-1497.
45. Lee J.S., et al. Direct interaction of ligand-receptor pairs specifying stomatal patterning. Genes Dev. 2012, 26:126-136.
46. Sugano S.S., et al. Stomagen positively regulates stomatal density in Arabidopsis. Nature 2010, 463:241-244.
47. Kondo T., et al. Stomatal density is controlled by a mesophyll-derived signaling molecule. Plant Cell Physiol. 2010, 51:1-8.
48. Geisler M., et al. Divergent regulation of stomatal initiation and patterning in organ and suborgan regions of the Arabidopsis mutants too many mouths and four lips. Planta 1998, 205:522-530.
49. Uchida N., et al. Regulation of inflorescence architecture by intertissue layer ligand-receptor communication between endodermis and phloem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:6337-6342.
50. Abrash E.B., Bergmann D.C. Regional specification of stomatal production by the putative ligand CHALLAH. Development 2010, 137:447-455.
51. Abrash E.B., et al. Generation of signaling specificity in Arabidopsis by spatially restricted buffering of ligand-receptor interactions. Plant Cell 2011, 23:2864-2879.
52. Pesch M., Hulskamp M. One, two, three...models for trichome patterning in Arabidopsis?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:587-592.
53. Zhang F., et al. A network of redundant bHLH proteins functions in all TTG1-dependent pathways of Arabidopsis. Development 2003, 130:4859-4869.
54. Oppenheimer D.G., et al. A myb gene required for leaf trichome differentiation in Arabidopsis is expressed in stipules. Cell 1991, 67:483-493.
55. Walker A.R., et al. The TRANSPARENT TESTA GLABRA1 locus, which regulates trichome differentiation and anthocyanin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis, encodes a WD40 repeat protein. Plant Cell 1999, 11:1337-1350.
56. Payne C.T., et al. GL3 encodes a bHLH protein that regulates trichome development in Arabidopsis through interaction with GL1 and TTG1. Genetics 2000, 156:1349-1362.
57. Rerie W.G., et al. The GLABRA2 gene encodes a homeo domain protein required for normal trichome development in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 1994, 8:1388-1399.
58. Zhao M., et al. The TTG1-bHLH-MYB complex controls trichome cell fate and patterning through direct targeting of regulatory loci. Development 2008, 135:1991-1999.
59. Schellmann S., et al. TRIPTYCHON and CAPRICE mediate lateral inhibition during trichome and root hair patterning in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2002, 21:5036-5046.
60. Lucas W.J., Lee J.Y. Plasmodesmata as a supracellular control network in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5:712-726.
61. Wester K., et al. Functional diversity of R3 single-repeat genes in trichome development. Development 2009, 136:1487-1496.
62. Digiuni S., et al. A competitive complex formation mechanism underlies trichome patterning on Arabidopsis leaves. Mol. Syst. Biol. 2008, 4:217.
63. Morohashi K., Grotewold E. A systems approach reveals regulatory circuitry for Arabidopsis trichome initiation by the GL3 and GL1 selectors. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000396.
64. Morohashi K., et al. Participation of the Arabidopsis bHLH factor GL3 in trichome initiation regulatory events. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145:736-746.
65. Larkin J.C., et al. Allele-specific interactions between ttg and gl1 during trichome development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 1999, 151:1591-1604.
66. Bouyer D., et al. Two-dimensional patterning by a trapping/depletion mechanism: the role of TTG1 and GL3 in Arabidopsis trichome formation. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:e141.
67. Schiefelbein J. Cell-fate specification in the epidermis: a common patterning mechanism in the root and shoot. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6:74-78.
68. Kwak S.H., et al. Positional signaling mediated by a receptor-like kinase in Arabidopsis. Science 2005, 307:1111-1113.
69. Lampard G.R., et al. Arabidopsis stomatal initiation is controlled by MAPK-mediated regulation of the bHLH SPEECHLESS. Science 2008, 322:1113-1116.