Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 411-421

  Wang, Hesheng ^a   Cao, Yue ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

AIF saturation; correction; DCE MRI; dual input single compartment model; liver

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTERIAL OXYGEN SATURATION; ARTERY PERFUSION; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST TO NOISE RATIO; DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHACED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; LIVER CANCER; LIVER FUNCTION TEST; LIVER PERFUSION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORGAN PERFUSION; PARAMETERS; PORTAL VENOUS PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ARTIFACTS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HEPATIC ARTERY; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84864256843     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23636     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Thng CH, Koh TS, Collins DJ, Koh DM,. Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the liver. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 1598-1609.
2. Van Beers BE, Leconte I, Materne R, Smith AM, Jamart J, Horsmans Y,. Hepatic perfusion parameters in chronic liver disease: dynamic CT measurements correlated with disease severity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 667-673. (Pubitemid 32181963)
3. Miyazaki S, Murase K, Yoshikawa T, Morimoto S, Ohno Y, Sugimura K,. A quantitative method for estimating hepatic blood flow using a dual-input single-compartment model. Br J Radiol 2008; 81: 790-800.
4. Donahue KM, Burstein D, Manning WJ, Gray ML,. Studies of Gd-DTPA relaxivity and proton exchange rates in tissue. Magn Reson Med 1994; 32: 66-76. (Pubitemid 24198557)
5. Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, et al. Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 563-574.
6. Landis CS, Li X, Telang FW, et al. Equilibrium transcytolemmal water-exchange kinetics in skeletal muscle in vivo. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 467-478. (Pubitemid 29416208)
7. Stanisz GJ, Henkelman RM,. Gd-DTPA relaxivity depends on macromolecular content. Magn Reson Med 2000; 44: 665-667.
8. Weinmann HJ, Brasch RC, Press WR, Wesbey GE,. Characteristics of gadolinium-DTPA complex: a potential NMR contrast agent. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1984; 142: 619-624. (Pubitemid 14199123)
9. de Bazelaire C, Rofsky NM, Duhamel G, et al. Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2083-2091. (Pubitemid 44193193)
10. Cao Y, Brown SL, Knight RA, Fenstermacher JD, Ewing JR,. Effect of intravascular-to-extravascular water exchange on the determination of blood-to-tissue transfer constant by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 282-293. (Pubitemid 40171042)
11. Ewing JR, Knight RA, Nagaraja TN, et al. Patlak plots of Gd-DTPA MRI data yield blood-brain transfer constants concordant with those of 14C-sucrose in areas of blood-brain opening. Magn Reson Med 2003; 50: 283-292. (Pubitemid 36950847)
12. Kuperman VY, Alley MT,. Differentiation between the effects of T1 and T2* shortening in contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 9: 172-176. (Pubitemid 29115338)
13. Cheng HL,. Investigation and optimization of parameter accuracy in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 736-743.
14. Ellinger R, Kremser C, Schocke MF, et al. The impact of peak saturation of the arterial input function on quantitative evaluation of dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR studies. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000; 24: 942-948. (Pubitemid 32201824)
15. Brunecker P, Villringer A, Schultze J, et al. Correcting saturation effects of the arterial input function in dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI: a Monte Carlo simulation. Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 25: 1300-1311. (Pubitemid 47625920)
16. Arfken G,. Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization. Orlando, FL: Academic Press; 1985.
17. Cao Y, Alspaugh J, Shen Z, Balter JM, Lawrence TS, Ten Haken RK,. A practical approach for quantitative estimates of voxel-by-voxel liver perfusion using DCE imaging and a compartmental model. Med Phys 2006; 33: 3057-3062. (Pubitemid 44154577)
18. Cao Y, Platt JF, Francis IR, et al. The prediction of radiation-induced liver dysfunction using a local dose and regional venous perfusion model. Med Phys 2007; 34: 604-612. (Pubitemid 46185140)
19. Yorke ED, Kutcher GJ, Jackson A, Ling CC,. Probability of radiation-induced complications in normal tissues with parallel architecture under conditions of uniform whole or partial organ irradiation. Radiother Oncol 1993; 26: 226-237. (Pubitemid 23132291)
20. Withers HR, Taylor JM, Maciejewski B,. Treatment volume and tissue tolerance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 14: 751-759.
21. Jackson A, Ten Haken RK, Robertson JM, Kessler ML, Kutcher GJ, Lawrence TS,. Analysis of clinical complication data for radiation hepatitis using a parallel architecture model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 883-891.
22. Jackson A, Kutcher GJ, Yorke ED,. Probability of radiation-induced complications for normal tissues with parallel architecture subject to non-uniform irradiation. Med Phys 1993; 20: 613-625. (Pubitemid 23195700)
23. Shukla-Dave A, Lee N, Stambuk H, et al. Average arterial input function for quantitative dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of neck nodal metastases. BMC Med Phys 2009; 9: 4.
24. Ahearn TS, Staff RT, Redpath TW, Semple SI,. The effects of renal variation upon measurements of perfusion and leakage volume in breast tumours. Phys Med Biol 2004; 49: 2041-2051. (Pubitemid 38735490)
25. Meng R, Chang SD, Jones EC, Goldenberg SL, Kozlowski P,. Comparison between population average and experimentally measured arterial input function in predicting biopsy results in prostate cancer. Acad Radiol 2010; 17: 520-525.
26. Kovar DF, Lewis M, Karczmar GS,. A new method for imaging perfusion and contrast extraction fraction: input functions derived from reference tissues. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998; 8: 1126-1134. (Pubitemid 28481800)
27. Yang C, Karczmar GS, Medved M, Stadler WM,. Multiple reference tissue method for contrast agent arterial input function estimation. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 1266-1275. (Pubitemid 350234214)
28. Fan X, Haney CR, Mustafi D, et al. Use of a reference tissue and blood vessel to measure the arterial input function in DCEMRI. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 1821-1826.
29. Heisen M, Fan X, Buurman J, van Riel NA, Karczmar GS, ter Haar Romeny BM,. The use of a reference tissue arterial input function with low-temporal-resolution DCE-MRI data. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 4871-4883.
30. Kuperman VY, Karczmar GS, Blomley MJ, Lewis MZ, Lubich LM, Lipton MJ,. Differentiating between T1 and T2* changes caused by gadopentetate dimeglumine in the kidney by using a double-echo dynamic MR imaging sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 764-768. (Pubitemid 126702021)
31. Uematsu H, Maeda M,. Double-echo perfusion-weighted MR imaging: basic concepts and application in brain tumors for the assessment of tumor blood volume and vascular permeability. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 180-186. (Pubitemid 43103583)
32. Bleeker EJ, van Buchem MA, Webb AG, van Osch MJ,. Phase-based arterial input function measurements for dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010; 64: 358-368.
33. Cron GO, Foottit C, Yankeelov TE, Avruch LI, Schweitzer ME, Cameron I,. Arterial input functions determined from MR signal magnitude and phase for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the human pelvis. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66: 498-504.
34. Korporaal JG, van den Berg CA, van Osch MJ, Groenendaal G, van Vulpen M, van der Heide UA,. Phase-based arterial input function measurements in the femoral arteries for quantification of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI and comparison with DCE-CT. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66: 1267-1274.
35. Knutsson L, Börjesson S, Larsson EM, et al. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in normal volunteers: correlation between Xe-133 SPECT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 913-920. (Pubitemid 47548151)
36. Schabel MC, DiBella EV, Jensen RL, Salzman KL,. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 4807-4823.
37. Schabel MC, Fluckiger JU, DiBella EV,. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: I. Simulations. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55: 4783-4806.
38. Murase K, Shinohara M, Yamazaki Y,. Accuracy of deconvolution analysis based on singular value decomposition for quantification of cerebral blood flow using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol 2001; 46: 3147-3159. (Pubitemid 34568064)