Most people do not ignore salient invalid cues in memory-based decisions

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 654-661

  Platzer, Christine ^a   Bröder, Arndt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision making; Format effects; Memory; Salience

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864112042     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-012-0248-4     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Agresti, A. (2002). Categorial data analysis (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
2. Bröder, A. (2010). Outcome-based strategy classification. In A. Glöckner & C. L. M. Witteman (Eds.), Foundations for tracing intuition: Challenges and methods (pp. 61-82). London: Psychology Press & Routledge.
3. Bröder, A., & Gaissmaier, W. (2007). Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 895-900.
4. Bröder, A., Newell, B. R., & Platzer, C. (2010). Cue integration vs. exemplar-based reasoning in multi-attribute decisions from memory: A matter of cue representation. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 326-338.
5. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003). "Take the best" versus simultaneous feature matching: Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 132, 277-293.
6. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2006). Stimulus format and working memory in fast and frugal strategy selection. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19, 361-380.
7. Gigerenzer, G., Hoffrage, U., & Kleinbölting, H. (1991). Probabilistic mental models: A Brunswikian theory of confidence. Psychological Review, 98, 506-528.
8. Gigerenzer, G., & Todd, P. M. (1999). Fast and frugal heuristics: The adaptive toolbox. In G. Gigerenzer, P. M. Todd, & the ABC Research Group (Eds.), Simple heuristics that make us smart (pp. 3-34). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Glöckner, A., & Hodges, S. D. (2011). Parallel constraint satisfaction in memory-based decisions. Experimental Psychology, 58, 180-195.
10. Khader, P. H., Pachur, T., Meier, S., Bien, S., Jost, K., & Rösler, F. (2011). Memory-based decision-making with heuristics involves increased activation of decision-relevant memory representations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3540-3554.
11. Martignon, L., & Hoffrage, U. (2002). Fast, frugal, and fit: Simple heuristics for paired comparison. Theory and Decision, 52, 29-71.
12. Newell, B. R., & Lee, M. D. (2010). The right tool for the job? Comparing an evidence accumulation and a naive strategy selection model of decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 456-481.
13. Paivio, A. (1978). Mental comparisons involving abstract attributes. Memory & Cognition, 6, 199-208.
14. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1988). Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 534-552.
15. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Persson, M., & Rieskamp, J. (2009). Inferences from memory: Strategy- and exemplar-based models compared. Acta Psychologica, 130, 25-37.
17. Platzer, C., Bröder, A., & Heck, D. (2012). Accessibility of cue information in memory-based decisions. Manuscript in preparation.
18. Seifert, L. S. (1997). Activating representations in permanent memory: Different benefits for pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1106-1121.
19. Unkelbach, C. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17, 339-345.
20. Vrij, A., Granhag, P. A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89-121.