Outcome-based strategy classification

Foundations for Tracing Intuition: Challenges and Methods

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 61-82

  Bröder, Arndt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77449084541     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203861936     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Bröder, A. (2000). A methodological comment on behavioral decision research. Psychologische Beiträge, 42, 645-662.
2. Bröder, A. (2003). Decision making with the "adaptive toolbox": Influence of environmental structure, intelligence, and working memory load. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 29, 611-625.
3. Bröder, A., & Gaissmaier, W. (2007). Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 895-900.
4. Bröder, A. & Newell, B.R. (2008). Challenging some common beliefs about cognitive costs: Empirical work within the adaptive toolbox metaphor. Judgment and Decision Making, 3, 195-204.
5. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003a). Bayesian strategy assessment in multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 16, 193-213.
6. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2003b). Take the best versus simultaneous feature matching:Probabilistic inferences from memory and effects of representation format. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 277-293.
7. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2006a). Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 904-918.
8. Bröder, A., & Schiffer, S. (2006b). Stimulus format and working memory in fast and frugal strategy selection. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(4), 361-380.
9. Garcia-Retamero, R., Hoffrage, U., & Dieckmann, A. (2007). When one cue is not enough: Combining fast and frugal heuristics with compound cue processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1197-1215.
10. Garcia-Retamero, R., Hoffrage, U., Dieckmann, A., & Ramos, M. (2007). Compound cue processing within the fast and frugal heuristics approach in nonlinearly separable environments. Learning and Motivation, 38, 16-34.
11. Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. In D. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Handbook of judgement and decision making. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
12. Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: The intelligence of the unconscious. New York:Viking.
13. Glöckner, A. (2008). Does intuition beat fast and frugal heuristics? A systematic empirical analysis. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp.309-325). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Glöckner, A., & Betsch, T. (2008). Do people make decisions under risk based on ignorance? An empirical test of the Priority Heuristic against Cumulative Prospect Theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107, 75-95.
15. Glöckner, A., & Hodges, S. D. (2008). Parallel constraint satisfaction in memorybased decisions. Manuscript submitted for publication.
16. Hammond, K. R., Hamm, R. M., Grassia, J., & Pearson, T. (1987). Direct comparison of the efficacy of intuitive and analytical cognition in expert judgment. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 17, 753-770.
17. Hoffman, P. J. (1960). The paramorphic representation of clinical judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 57, 116-131.
18. Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2003). Take the best or look at the rest? Factors influencing "one-reason" decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 53-65.
19. Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231-259.
20. Payne, J. W., Bettman, J. R., & Johnson, E. J. (1993). The adaptive decision maker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Persson, M. & Rieskamp, J. (2009). Inferences from memory: Strategy- and exemplarbased judgment models compared. Acta Psychologica, 130, 25-37.