Configural processing hypothesis and face-inversion effect

Advances in Face Image Analysis: Techniques and Technologies

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 316-333

  Rakover, Sam S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864084424     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-991-0.ch017     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Ashworth, A. R. S. III, Vuong, Q. C., Rossion, B., & Tarr, M. J. (2008). Recognizing rotated faces and Greebles: What properties drive the face inversion effect? Visual Cognition, 16, 754-784. doi:10.1080/13506280701381741
2. Bartlett, J. C., Searcy, J. H., & Abdi, H. (2003). What are the routes to face recognition? In Peterson, M. A., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
3. Barton, J. J. S., Keenan, J. P., & Bass, T. (2001). Discrimination of spatial relations and features in faces: Effects of inversion and viewing duration. The British Journal of Psychology, 92, 527-549. doi:10.1348/000712601162329
4. Coren, S., & Girgus, J. S. (1978). Seeing is deceiving: The psychology of visual illusions. Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
5. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 115, 107-117. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.2.107
6. Farah, M. J., Tanaka, J. W., & Drain, H. M. (1995). What causes the face inversion effect? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 21, 628-634. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.21.3.628
7. Freire, A., Lee, K., & Symons, L. A. (2000). The face-inversion effect as a deficit in the encoding of configural information: Direct evidence. Perception, 29, 159-170. doi:10.1068/p3012
8. Gauthier, I., & Bukach, C. (2007). Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? Cognition, 103, 322-330. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.003
9. Gauthier, I., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Becoming a 'Greeble' expert: Exploring mechanisms for face recognition. Vision Research, 37, 1673-1682. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00286-6
10. Goffaux, V., & Rossion, B. (2007). Face inversion disproportionately impairs perception of vertical but not horizontal relations between features. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 33, 995-1001. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.995
11. Leder, H., & Bruce, V. (2000). When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 513-536. doi:10.1080/027249800390583
12. Leder, H., & Carbon, C.-C. (2006). Face-specific configural processing of relational information. The British Journal of Psychology, 97, 19-29. doi:10.1348/000712605X54794
13. Liu, C. H., & Chaudhuri, A. (2003). What deter-mines whether faces are special? Visual Cognition, 10, 385-408. doi:10.1080/13506280244000050
14. Maurer, D., Le Grand, R., & Mondloch, C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 255-260. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01903-4
15. McKone, E., Crookes, K., & Kanwisher, N. (in press). The cognitive and neural development of face recognition in Humans. In Gazzaniga, M. (Ed.), The cognitive Neurosciences.
16. McKone, E., & Robbins, R. (2007). The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: Reply to Gauthier & Bukach. Cognition, 103, 331-336. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.014
17. Nachson, I. (1995). On the modularity of face perception: The riddle of domain specificity. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 353-383.
18. Peterson, M. A., & Rhodes, G. (2003). Introduction: analytic and holistic processing - the view through different lenses. In Peterson, M. A., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
19. Rakover, S. S. (1990). Metapsychology: missing links in behavior, mind and science. New York: Solomon/Paragon.
20. Rakover, S. S. (2002). Featural vs. configurational information in faces: A conceptual and empirical analysis. The British Journal of Psychology, 93, 1-30. doi:10.1348/000712602162427
21. Rakover, S. S. (2008). Is facial beauty an innate response to the Leonardian Proportion? Empirical Studies of the Arts, 26, 155-179. doi:10.2190/EM.26.2.b
22. Rakover, S. S., & Cahlon, B. (2001). Face recognition: Cognitive and computational processes. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
23. Rakover, S. S., & Teucher, B. (1997). Facial inversion effects: part and whole relationship. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 752-761.
24. Rhodes, G., Brake, K., & Atkinson, A. (1993). What's lost in inverted faces? Cognition, 47, 25-57. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(93)90061-Y
25. Riesenhuber, M., Jarudi, I., Gilad, S., & Sinha, P. (2004). Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape-based model of vision. Proceedings. Biological Sciences, 271(Suppl.), S448-S450. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2004.0216
26. Robbins, R., & McKone, E. (2007). No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioral tasks. Cognition, 103, 34-79. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.02.008
27. Robinson, J. O. (1998). The psychology of visual illusion. New York: Dover Publications.
28. Rossion, B. (2008). Picture-plane inversion leads to qualitative changes of face perception. Acta Psychologica, 128, 274-289. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.02.003
29. Rossion, B., & Gauthier, I. (2002). How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 1, 63-75. doi:10.1177/1534582302001001004
30. Schwaninger, A., Carbon, C.-C., & Leder, H. (2003). Expert face processing: Specialization and constraints. In Schwarzer, G., & Leder, H. (Eds.), Development of face processing. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
31. Schwaninger, A., Ryf, S., & Hofer, F. (2003). Configural information is processed differently in perception and recognition of faces. Vision Research, 43, 1501-1505. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00171-8
32. Searcy, J. H., & Bartlett, J. C. (1996). Inversion and processing of component and spatial-relational information in faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 22, 904-915. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.22.4.904
33. Sekuler, A. B., Gaspar, C. M., Gold, J. M., & Bennett, P. J. (2004). Inversion leads to quantitative, not qualitative, changes in face processing. Current Biology, 14, 391-396. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.02.028
34. Solso, R. L., & McCarthy, J. E. (1981). Prototype formation of faces: A case of pseudo-memory. The British Journal of Psychology, 72, 499-503.
35. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (1993). Parts and their configuration in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 225-245.
36. Tanaka, J. W., & Farah, M. J. (2003). The holistic representation of faces. In Peterson, M. A., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
37. Tarr, M. J. (2003). Visual object recognition: Can a single mechanism suffice? In Peterson, M. A., & Rhodes, G. (Eds.), Perception of faces, objects, and scenes: Analytic and holistic processes. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38. Tarr, M. J., & Cheng, Y. D. (2003). Learning to see faces and objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 23-30. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)00010-4
39. Valentine, T. (1988). Upside-down faces: A review of the effect of inversion on face recognition. The British Journal of Psychology, 79, 471-491.
40. Valentine, T. (1991). A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 161-204.
41. Yin, R. K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 141-145. doi:10.1037/h0027474
42. Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Face perception: Domain specific not process specific. Neuron, 44, 889-898.
43. Yovel, G., & Kanwisher, N. (2008). The representations of spacing and part-based information are associated for upright faces but dissociated for objects: Evidence from individual differences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 933-939. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.5.933