Developing a new measure of small bowel peristalsis with dynamic MR: A proof of concept study

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 53, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 593-600

  Farghal, Aser ^a   Kasmai, Bahman ^a   Malcolm, Paul N ^a   Graves, Martin J ^b   Toms, Andoni P ^a  

^a NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Dynamic; Functional; MRI; Small bowel

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION; AUTOMATED SEGMENTATION METHOD; BREATH-HOLD; FUNCTIONAL; GLOBAL MEASURES; INTRAMUSCULAR INJECTIONS; MR IMAGES; OPTIMAL SEGMENTATION; PROOF OF CONCEPT; SIGNAL AMPLITUDE; SIGNAL AMPLITUDE CHANGES; SMALL BOWEL; THRESHOLDING;

AUTOMATION; DYNAMICS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERISTALSIS; PHYSIOLOGY; REFERENCE VALUE; SMALL INTESTINE;

ADULT; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; INTESTINE, SMALL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERISTALSIS; REFERENCE VALUES;

EID: 84864030518     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.110634     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bernstein CN, Boult IF, Greenberg HM, et al. A prospective randomized comparison between small bowel enteroclysis and small bowel follow-through in Crohn's disease. Gastroenterology 1997;113:390-8
2. Bessette JR, Maglinte DD, Kelvin FM, et al. Primary malignant tumors in the small bowel: a comparison of the small-bowel enema and conventional follow-through examination. Am J Roentgenol 1989;153:741-4
3. Chung CC, Meng WC, Yu SC, et al. A prospective study on the use of water-soluble contrast follow-through radiology in the management of small bowel obstruction. Aust N Z J Surg 1996;66:598-601
4. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD. Enteroclysis or small bowel follow-through in Crohn's diseases? Gastroenterology 1998;114:1349-51
5. Ha HK, Shin JH, Rha SE, et al. Modified small-bowel follow-through: use of methylcellulose to improve bowel transradiance and prepare barium suspension. Radiology 1999;211:197-201
6. Toms AP, Barltrop A, Freeman AH. A prospective randomised study comparing enteroclysis with small bowel follow-through examinations in 244 patients. Eur Radiol 2001;11:1155-60
7. Maglinte DD, Antley RM. Radiology of the small bowel: enteroclysis and the conventional follow-through. Gastroenterology 1984;86:383-4
8. Tokuda M, Inada Y, Ishikawa T, et al. [The efficacy of small bowel follow-through radiography as a routine examination following the upper G. I. series]. Rinsho Hoshasen 1984;29:163-6
9. Fraser GM, Adam RD. Modifications to the gas-enhanced small bowel barium follow-through using gastrografin and compression. Clin Radiol 1988;39:537-41
10. Maglinte DDT, Heitkamp DE, Howard TJ, et al. Current concepts in imaging of small bowel obstruction. Radiol Clin North Am 2003;41:263-283, vi
11. Parkman HP. Assessment of gastric emptying and small-bowel motility: scintigraphy, breath tests, manometry, and SmartPill. Gastrointest. Endosc Clin N Am 2009;19:49-55, vi
12. Minordi LM, Vecchioli A, Poloni G, et al. Enteroclysis CT and PEG-CT in patients with previous small-bowel surgical resection for Crohn's disease: CT findings and correlation with endoscopy. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2432-40
13. Lee SS, Kim AY, Yang S-K, et al. Crohn disease of the small bowel: comparison of CT enterography, MR enterography, and small-bowel follow-through as diagnostic techniques. Radiology 2009;251:751-61
14. Hwang J-Y, Lee JK, Lee JE, et al. Value of multidetector CT in decision making regarding surgery in patients with small-bowel obstruction due to adhesion. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2425-31
15. Patak MA, Froehlich JM, von Weymarn C, et al. Non-invasive measurement of small-bowel motility by MRI after abdominal surgery. Gut 2007;56:1023-5
16. Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, et al. Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:370-5
17. Odille F, Menys A, Ahmed A, et al. Quantitative assessment of small bowel motility by nonrigid registration of dynamic MR images. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine: Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine [Internet]. 2012 Jan 10. See http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22234983
18. Wakamiya M, Furukawa A, Kanasaki S, et al. Assessment of small bowel motility function with cine-MRI using balanced steady-state free precession sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;33:1235-40
19. Gutzeit A, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, et al. Feasibility of small bowel flow rate measurement with MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:345-51
20. Ha HK, Lee EH, Lim CH, et al. Application of MRI for small intestinal diseases. J Magn Reson Imaging 1998;8:375-83
21. Froehlich JM, Waldherr C, Stoupis C, et al. MR motility imaging in Crohn's disease improves lesion detection compared with standard MR imaging. Eur Radiol 2010;20:1945-51
22. Kitazume Y, Satoh S, Hosoi H, et al. Cine magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of peristalsis of small bowel with longitudinal ulcer in Crohn disease: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2007;31:876-83
23. Wright J, Evans D, Gowland P, et al. Validation of antroduodenal motility measurements made by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1999;11:19-25
24. Toms AP, Farghal A, Kasmai B, et al. Physiology of the small bowel: a new approach using MRI and proposal for a new metric of function. Med Hypotheses 2011;76:834-9
25. Lomas DJ, Graves MJ. Small bowel MRI using water as a contrast medium. Br J Radiol 1999;72:994-7
26. Giovagnoni A, Fabbri A, Maccioni F. Oral contrast agents in MRI of the gastrointestinal tract. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:367-75
27. Kuehle CA, Ajaj W, Ladd SC, et al. Hydro-MRI of the small bowel: effect of contrast volume, timing of contrast administration, and data acquisition on bowel distention. Am J Roentgenol 2006;187:W375-385
28. Asbach P, Breitwieser C, Diederichs G, et al. Cine magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel: comparison of different oral contrast media. Acta Radiol 2006;47:899-906
29. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, et al. MR imaging of the small bowel with a true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 2000;35:707-11
30. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1991
31. Fleckenstein P. A probe for intraluminal recording of myoelectric activity from multiple sites in the human small intestine. Scand J Gastroenterol 1978;13:767-70
32. Froehlich JM, Daenzer M, von Weymarn C, et al. Aperistaltic effect of hyoscine N-butylbromide versus glucagon on the small bowel assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2009;19:1387-93
33. Eng J. Sample size estimation: how many individuals should be studied? Radiology 2003;227:309-13