Cine magnetic resonance imaging of the small bowel: Comparison of different oral contrast media

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 899-906

  Asbach, P ^a   Breitwieser, C ^b   Diederichs, G ^b   Eisele, S ^b   Kivelitz, D ^b   Taupitz, M ^b   Zeitz, M ^b   Hamm, B ^b   Klessen, C ^b  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^b KLINIKUM BRAUNSCHWEIG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cine imaging; MRI; Oral contrast media; Real time imaging

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE CONTROL; INGESTION (ENGINES); PATIENT MONITORING; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

BALANCED STEADY-STATE FREE PRECESSION (BSSFP); CINE IMAGING; ORAL CONTRAST MEDIA; REAL TIME IMAGING;

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PATHOLOGY; SMALL INTESTINE;

ADMINISTRATION, ORAL; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTESTINE, SMALL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 33750549457     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02841850600965054     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ajaj W, Goehde SC, Schneemann H, Ruelim SG, Debatin JF, Lauenstein TC. Dose optimization of mannitol solution for small bowel distension in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:648-53.
2. Ajaj W, Goyen M, Schneemann H, Kuehle C, Nuefer M, Ruehm SG, et al. Oral contrast media for small bowel distension in MRI: influence of the osmolarity for small bowel distension. Eur Radiol 2005;15:1400-6.
3. Buhmann S, Kirchhoff C, Wielage C, Fischer T, Mussack T, Reiser M, et al. Visualization and quantification of large bowel motility with functional cine-MRI. Rofo 2005;177:35-40.
4. Froehlich JM, Patak MA, von Weymarn C, Juli CF, Zollikofer CL, Wentz KU. Small bowel motility assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:370-5.
5. Gourtsoyiannis N, Papanikolaou N, Grammatikakis J, Maris T, Prassopoulos P. MR imaging of the small bowel with true-FISP sequence after enteroclysis with water solution. Invest Radiol 2000;35:707-11.
6. Hiraishi K, Narabayashi I, Fujita O, Yamamoto K, Sagami A, Hisada Y, et al. Blueberry juice: preliminary evaluation as an oral contrast medium in gastrointestinal MR imaging. Radiology 1995;194:119-23.
7. Hirohashi S, Hirohashi R, Uchida H, Kitano S, Tanaka M, Matsuo N, et al. MR imaging oral contrast medium mixed with milk for the small intestine. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1994;54:784-8.
8. Hohl C, Haage P, Krombach G A, Schmidt T, Ahaus M, Gunther RW, et al. Diagnostic evaluation of chronic inflammatory intestinal diseases in children and adolescents: MRI with true-FISP as new gold standard? Rofo 2005;177:856-63.
9. Johnson WK, Stoupis C, Torres GM, Rosenberg EB, Ros PR. Superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) as an oral contrast agent in gastrointestinal (GI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): comparison with state-of-the-art computed tomography (CT). Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:43-9.
10. Klessen C, Asbach P, Kroencke TJ, Fischer T, Warmuth C, Stemmer A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the upper abdomen using a free-breathing T2-weighted turbo spin echo sequence with navigator triggered prospective acquisition correction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;21:576-82.
11. Kunz P, Feinle C, Schwizer W, Fried M, Boesiger P. Assessment of gastric motor function during the emptying of solid and liquid meals in humans by MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:75-80.
12. Lauenstein TC, Schneemann H, Vogt FM, Herborn CU, Ruehm SG, Debatin JF. Optimization of oral contrast media for MR imaging of the small bowel. Radiology 2003;228:279-83.
13. Lienemann A, Sprenger D, Seitz HO, Korell M, Reiser M. Detection and mapping of intraabdominal adhesions by using functional cine MR imaging: preliminary results. Radiology 2000;217:421-5.
14. Low RN, Francis IR, Politoske D, Bennett M. Crohn's disease evaluation: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR imaging and single-phase helical CT scanning. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:127-35.
15. Narin B, Ajaj W, Gohde S, Langhorst J, Akgoz H, Gerken G, et al. Combined small and large bowel MR imaging in patients with Crohn's disease: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1535-42.
16. Rohr A, Rohr D, Kuhbacher T, Schreiber S, Heller M, Reuter M. Radiological assessment of small bowel obstructions: value of conventional enteroclysis and dynamic MR-enteroclysis. Rofo 2002;174:1158-64.
17. Sato S. A study of green tea for a positive gastrointestinal MR imaging enhancing medium. Nippon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi 1994;54:876-85.
18. Schreyer AG, Geissler A, Albrich H, Scholmerich J, Feuerbach S, Rogler G, et al. Abdominal MRI after enteroclysis or with oral contrast in patients with suspected or proven Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004;2:491-7.
19. Schreyer AG, Herfarth H, Kikinis R, Seitz J, Scholmerich J, Geissler A, et al. 3D modeling and virtual endoscopy of the small bowel based on magnetic resonance imaging in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Invest Radiol 2002;37:528-33.
20. Schunk K, Reiter S, Kern A, Orth TH, Wanitschke R. Hydro-MRI in inflammatory bowel disease: a comparison with colonoscopy and histology. Rofo 2001;173:731-8.
21. Schwizer W, Fox M, Steingotter A. Non-invasive investigation of gastrointestinal functions with magnetic resonance imaging: towards an "ideal" investigation of gastrointestinal function. Gut 2003;52:34-9.
22. Sellink JL, Rosenbusch G. The ten commandments for enteroclysis or ten golden rules for proper enteroclysis technique. Radiologe 1981;21:366-76.
23. Umschaden HW, Szolar D, Gasser J, Umschaden M, Haselbach H. Small-bowel disease: comparison of MR enteroclysis images with conventional enteroclysis and surgical findings. Radiology 2000;215:717-25.
24. de Zwart IM, Mearadji B, Lamb HJ, Eilers PH, Masclee AA, de Roos A, et al. Gastric motility: comparison of assessment with real-time MR imaging or barostat measurement - initial experience. Radiology 2002;224:592-7.