Detecting small-scale genotype-environment interactions in apomictic dandelion (Taraxacum officinale) populations

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 8, 2012, Pages 1667-1675

  McLeod, K A ^a,b   Scascitelli, M ^a   Vellend, M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE SHERBROOKE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Apomictic; Dandelion; Disturbance; Local adaptation; Microsatellites; Stress; Weed

Indexed keywords

MICROSATELLITE DNA;

APOMIXIS; DETECTION METHOD; DISTURBANCE; DROUGHT; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; GENE FLOW; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE-ENVIRONMENT INTERACTION; HERB; LOCAL ADAPTATION; MOWING; NATURAL SELECTION; PRECISION;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; DANDELION; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENT; GENOTYPE; MICROSATELLITE REPEATS; TARAXACUM;

TARAXACUM OFFICINALE;

EID: 84864024312     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2012.02549.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Antonovics, J. 2006. Evolution in closely adjacent populations X: long term persistence of preproductive isolation at a mine boundary. Heredity 97: 33-37.
2. Antonovics, J. & Bradshaw, A.D. 1970. Evolution in closely adjacent populations VIII: clinal patterns at a mine boundary. Heredity 25: 349-362.
3. Brownstein, M.J., Carpten, J.D. & Smith, J.R. 1996. Modulation of non-templated nucleotide addition by Taq DNA polymerase: primer modifications that facilitate genotyping. Biotechniques 20: 1004-1006, 1008-10.
4. Dempewolf, H., Kane, N.C., Ostevik, K.L., Eleta, M., Barker, M.S., Lai, Z. et al. 2010. Establishing genomic tools and resources for Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass.-the development of a library of expressed sequence tags, microsatellite loci, and the sequencing of its chloroplast genome. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 10: 1048-1058.
5. Dlugosch, K.M. & Parker, I.M. 2008. Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol. Ecol. 17: 431-449.
6. Don, R.H., Cox, P.T., Wainwright, B.J., Baker, K. & Mattick, J.S. 1991. 'Touchdown' PCR to circumvent spurious priming during gene amplification. Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 4008.
7. Drummond, E.B.M. & Vellend, M. 2012. Genotypic diversity effects on the performance of Taraxacum officinale populations increase with time and environmental favorability. PLoS ONE 7: e30314.
8. Gillespie, J.H. 1991. The Causes of Molecular Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Grime, J.P. 2001. Plant Strategies, Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex, UK.
10. Hughes, A.R., Inouye, B.D., Johnson, M.T.J., Underwood, N. & Vellend, M. 2008. Ecological consequences of genetic diversity. Ecol. Lett. 11: 609-623.
11. Juenger, T. & Bergelson, J. 2002. The spatial scale of genotype by environment interaction (GEI) for fitness in the loose-flowered Gilia, Ipomopsis Laxiflora (Polemoniaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 163: 613-618.
12. Kawecki, T.J. & Ebert, D. 2004. Conceptual issues in local adaptation. Ecol. Lett. 7: 1225-1241.
13. Kimura, M. 1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. Cambridge University Press, New York.
14. King, L.M. 1993. Origins of genotypic variation in North American dandelions inferred from ribosomal DNA and chloroplast DNA restriction enzyme analysis. Evolution 47: 136-151.
15. Kingsolver, J.G., Hoekstra, H.E., Hoekstra, J.M., Berrigan, D., Vignieri, S.N., Hill, C.E. et al. 2001. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. Am. Nat. 157: 245-261.
16. Lavergne, S. & Molofsky, J. 2007. Increased genetic variation and evolutionary potential drive the success of an invasive grass. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 3883-3888.
17. Leimu, R. & Fischer, M. 2008. A meta-analysis of local adaptation in plants. PLoS ONE 3: e4010.
18. Lenormand, T. 2002. Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 183-189.
19. Levin, D.A. 2009. Flowering-time plasticity facilitates niche shifts in adjacent populations. New Phytol. 183: 661-666.
20. Lewontin, R.C. 1974. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change. Columbia University Press, New York.
21. Linhart, Y.B. & Grant, M.C. 1996. Evolutionary significance of local genetic differentiation in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 237-277.
22. Lyman, J.C. & Ellstrand, N.C. 1984. Clonal diversity in Taraxacum ofiicinale (Compositae), an apomict. Heredity 53: 1-10.
23. Meirmans, P.G. & Van Tienderen, P.H. 2004. GENOTYPE and GENODIVE: two programs for the analysis of genetic diversity of asexual organisms. Mol. Ecol. Notes 4: 792-794.
24. North, A., Pennanen, J., Ovaskeinen, O. & Laine, A. 2011. Local adaptation in a changing world: the roles of gene-flow, mutation, and sexual reproduction. Evolution 65: 79-89.
25. Nuismer, S.L. & Gandon, S. 2008. Moving beyond common-garden and transplant designs: insight into the causes of local adaptation in species interactions. Am. Nat. 171: 658-668.
26. Pantel, J.H., Juenger, T.E. & Leibold, M.A. 2011. Environmental gradients structure Daphnia pulex x pulicaria clonal distribution. J. Evol. Biol. 24: 723-732.
27. Rainey, P.B. & Travisano, M. 1998. Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment. Nature 398: 69-72.
28. Saether, S.A., Fiske, P., Kalas, J.A., Kuresoo, A., Luigujoe, L., Piertney, S.B. et al. 2007. Inferring local adaptation from Qst - Fst comparisons: neutral genetic and quantitative trait variation in European populations of great snipe. J. Evol. Biol. 20: 1563-1576.
29. Schluter, D., Marchinko, K.B., Barrett, R.D.H. & Rogers, S.M. 2010. Natural selection and the genetics of adaptation in threespine stickleback. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 365: 2479-2486.
30. Schuelke, M. 2000. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nat. Biotechnol. 18: 233-234.
31. Sebens, K.P. & Thorne, L.B. 1985. Coexistence of clones, clonal diversity and the effects of disturbance. In: Population biology and evolution of clonal organisms (J.B.C. Jackson & R.E. Cook, eds), pp. 357-398. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
32. Solbrig, O.T. & Simpson, B.B. 1974. Components of regulation of a population of dandelions in Michigan. J. Ecol. 62: 473-486.
33. Solbrig, O.T. & Simpson, B.B. 1977. A garden experiment on competition between biotypes of the common dandelion (Taraxacum officinale). J. Ecol. 65: 427-430.
34. Stewart-Wade, S.M., Neumass, S., Collins, L.L. & Boland, G.J. 2002. The biology of Canadian weeds. 117. Taraxacum officinale G.H. Webber ex Wiggers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82: 825-853.
35. Stratton, D.A. 1992. Life-cycle components of selection in Erigeron annuus: II. Genetic variation. Evol. 46: 107-120.
36. Stratton, D.A. 1994. Genotype-by-environment interactions for fitness of Erigeron annus show fine-scale selective heterogeneity. Evol. 48: 1607-1618.
37. Stratton, D.A. 1995. Spatial scale of variation in fitness of Eigeron annuus. Am. Nat. 146: 608-624.
38. Stratton, D.A. & Bennington, C.C. 1996. Measuring spatial variation in natural selection using randomly-sown seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Evol. Biol. 9: 215-228.
39. Vavrek, M.C. 1998. Within-population genetic diversity of Taraxacum officinale (Asteraceae): differential genotype response and effect on interspecific competition. Am. J. Bot. 85: 947-954.
40. Vellend, M., Harmon, L.J., Lockwood, J.L., Mayfield, M.M., Hughes, A.R., Wares, J.P. et al. 2007. Effects of exotic species on evolutionary diversification. Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 481-488.
41. Vellend, M., Drummond, E.B.M. & Muir, J.L. 2009. Ecological differentiation among genotypes of dandelions (Taraxacum officinale). Weed Sci. 57: 410-416.
42. Vellend, M., Drummond, E.B.M. & Tomimatsu, H. 2010. Effects of genotype identity and diversity on the invasiveness and invasibility of plant populations. Oecologia 162: 371-381.
43. Verhoeven, K.J.F., Jansen, J.J., van Dikj, P.J. & Biere, A. 2010. Stress-induced DNA methylation changes and their heritability in asexual dandelions. New Phytol. 185: 1108-1118.
44. Weeks, A.R. & Hoffman, A.A. 2008. Frequency-dependent selection maintains clonal diversity in an asexual organism. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 17872-17877.