The SUMO pathway promotes basic helix-loop-helix proneural factor activity via a direct effect on the zn finger protein senseless

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Volumn 32, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 2849-2860

  Powell, Lynn M ^a   Chen, Angela ^b   Huang, Yan Chang ^b   Wang, Pin Yao ^b   Kemp, Sadie E ^a,c   Jarman, Andrew P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LYSINE; SENSELESS PROTEIN; SUMO 1 PROTEIN; SUMO 2 PROTEIN; SUMO PROTEIN; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR E2A; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CELL FATE; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; HELA CELL; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VIVO STUDY; NERVOUS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN PROCESSING; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; SUMOYLATION;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; BASE SEQUENCE; BASIC HELIX-LOOP-HELIX TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; CELL LINE; DNA PRIMERS; DROSOPHILA; DROSOPHILA PROTEINS; GENES, INSECT; HELA CELLS; HUMANS; LYSINE; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; NEUROGENESIS; NUCLEAR PROTEINS; RECOMBINANT FUSION PROTEINS; SENSE ORGANS; SMALL UBIQUITIN-RELATED MODIFIER PROTEINS; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS; TWO-HYBRID SYSTEM TECHNIQUES;

EID: 84863992213     PISSN: 02707306     EISSN: 10985549     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06595-11     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Abed M, et al. 2011. Degringolade, a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase, inhibits Hairy/Groucho-mediated repression. EMBO J. 30:1289 -1301.
2. Abed M, Bitman-Lotan E, Orian A. 2011. A fly view of a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase. Fly (Austin) 5(4):340 -344. doi:10.4161/fly.5.4.17608.
3. Acar M, et al. 2006. Senseless physically interacts with proneural proteins and functions as a transcriptional co-activator. Development 133:1979- 1989.
4. Barad O, Hornstein E, Barkai N. 2011. Robust selection of sensory organ precursors by the Notch-Delta pathway. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23:663- 667.
5. Barry KC, et al. 2011. The Drosophila STUbL protein Degringolade limits HES functions during embryogenesis. Development 138:1759 -1769.
6. Bedford L, Lowe J, Dick LR, Mayer RJ, Brownell JE. 2011. Ubiquitinlike protein conjugation and the ubiquitin-proteasome system as drug targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 10:29-46.
7. Bertrand N, Castro DS, Guillemot F. 2002. Proneural genes and the specification of neural cell types. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3:517-530.
8. Bhaskar V, Smith M, Courey AJ. 2002. Conjugation of Smt3 to dorsal may potentiate the Drosophila immune response. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22:492- 504.
9. Bhaskar V, Valentine SA, Courey AJ. 2000. A functional interaction between dorsal and components of the Smt3 conjugation machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 275:4033- 4040.
10. Bischof J, Maeda RK, Hediger M, Karch F, Basler K. 2007. An optimized transgenesis system for Drosophila using germ-line-specific phiC31 integrases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 104:3312-3317.
11. Chakrabarti SR, Sood R, Nandi S, Nucifora G. 2000. Posttranslational modification of TEL and TEL/AML1 by SUMO-1 and cell-cycledependent assembly into nuclear bodies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97:13281-13285.
12. Chen A, et al. 2006. SUMO regulates the cytoplasmonuclear transport of its target protein Daxx. J. Cell Biochem. 98:895-911.
13. Chien C-T, Hsiao C-D, Jan LY, Jan YN. 1996. Neuronal type information encoded in the basic-helix-loop-helix domain of proneural genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93:13239 -13244.
14. Costa MW, et al. 2011. Complex SUMO-1 regulation of cardiac transcription factor Nkx2-5. PLoS One 6:e24812. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0024812.
15. Culi J, Modolell J. 1998. Proneural gene self-stimulation in neural precursors: an essential mechanism for sense organ development that is regulated by Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 12:2036 -2047.
16. Duan Z, et al. 2007. Epigenetic regulation of protein-coding and microRNA genes by the Gfi1-interacting tumor suppressor PRDM5. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27:6889-6902.
17. Duffy JB. 2002. GAL4 system in Drosophila: a fly geneticist's Swiss army knife. Genesis 34:1-15.
18. Garcia-Dominguez M, Reyes JC. 2009. SUMO association with repressor complexes, emerging routes for transcriptional control. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1789:451- 459.
19. Gareau JR, Lima CD. 2010. The SUMO pathway: emerging mechanisms that shape specificity, conjugation and recognition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11:861- 871.
20. Giagtzoglou N, Koumbanakis KA, Fullard J, Zarifi I, Delidakis C. 2005. Role of the ScCterminus in transcriptional activation and E(spl) repressor recruitment. J. Biol. Chem. 280:1299 -1305.
21. Girdwood DW, Tatham MH, Hay RT. 2004. SUMO and transcriptional regulation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 15:201-210.
22. Grimes HL, Chan TO, Zweidler-McKay PA, Tong B, Tsichlis PN. 1996. The Gfi-1 proto-oncoprotein contains a novel transcriptional repressor domain, SNAG, and inhibits G1 arrest induced by interleukin-2 withdrawal. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:6263- 6272.
23. Groth AC, Fish M, Nusse R, Calos MP. 2004. Construction of transgenic Drosophila by using the site-specific integrase from phage phiC31. Genetics 166:1775-1782.
24. Guruharsha KG, et al. A protein complex network of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 147:690 -703.
25. Gutzwiller LM, et al. 2010. Proneural and abdominal Hox inputs synergize to promote sensory organ formation in the Drosophila abdomen. Dev. Biol. 348:231-243.
26. Hannoun Z, Greenhough S, Jaffray E, Hay RT, Hay DC. 2010. Posttranslational modification by SUMO. Toxicology 278:288 -293.
27. Hay RT. 2005. SUMO: a history of modification. Mol. Cell 18:1-12.
28. Herrmann J, Lerman LO, Lerman A. 2007. Ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like proteins in protein regulation. Circ. Res. 100:1276 -1291.
29. Jafar-Nejad H, et al. 2003. Senseless acts as a binary switch during sensory organ precursor selection. Genes Dev. 17:2966 -2978.
30. Jafar-Nejad H, Bellen HJ. 2004. Gfi/Pag-3/senseless zinc finger proteins: a unifying theme? Mol. Cell. Biol. 24:8803- 8812.
31. Jarman AP, Ahmed I. 1998. The specificity of proneural genes in determining Drosophila sense organ identity. Mech. Dev. 76:117-125.
32. Jarman AP, Grau Y, Jan LY, Jan YN. 1993. atonal is a proneural gene that directs chordotonal organ formation in the Drosophila peripheral nervous system. Cell 73:1307-1321.
33. Jennings B, Preiss A, Delidakis C, Bray S. 1994. The Notch signalling pathway is required for Enhancer of split bHLH protein expression during neurogenesis in the Drosophila embryo. Development 120:3537-3548.
34. Kazanjian A, et al. 2004. Growth factor independence-1 is expressed in primary human neuroendocrine lung carcinomas and mediates the differentiation of murine pulmonary neuroendocrine cells. Cancer Res. 64: 6874-6882.
35. Kirjavainen A, et al. 2008. Prox1 interacts with Atoh1 and Gfi1, and regulates cellular differentiation in the inner ear sensory epithelia. Dev. Biol. 322:33- 45.
36. Klein UR, Haindl M, Nigg EA, Muller S. 2009. RanBP2 and SENP3 function in a mitotic SUMO2/3 conjugation-deconjugation cycle on Borealin. Mol. Biol. Cell 20:410-418.
37. Kroetz MB, Hochstrasser M. 2009. Identification of SUMO-interacting proteins by yeast two-hybrid analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 497:107-120.
38. Kunapuli P, Kasyapa CS, Chin SF, Caldas C, Cowell JK. 2006. ZNF198, a zinc finger protein rearranged in myeloproliferative disease, localizes to the PML nuclear bodies and interacts with SUMO-1 and PML. Exp. Cell Res. 312:3739 -3751.
39. Lage P, Jan YN, Jarman AP. 1997. Requirement for EGF receptor signalling in neural recruitment during formation of Drosophila chordotonal sense organ clusters. Curr. Biol. 7:166 -175.
40. Lee PS, Chang C, Liu D, Derynck R. 2003. Sumoylation of Smad4, the common Smad mediator of transforming growth factor-beta family signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 278:27853-27863.
41. Lehembre F, et al. 2000. Covalent modification of the transcriptional repressor tramtrack by the ubiquitin-related protein Smt3 in Drosophila flies. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:1072-1082.
42. Leyns L, Gomez-Skarmeta JL, Dambly-Chaudiere C. 1996. iroquois: a prepattern gene that controls the formation of bristles on the thorax of Drosophila. Mech. Dev. 59:63-72.
43. Li-Kroeger D, Witt LM, Grimes HL, Cook TA, Gebelein B. 2008. Hox and senseless antagonism functions as a molecular switch to regulate EGF secretion in the Drosophila PNS. Dev. Cell 15:298 -308.
44. Lin DY, et al. 2006. Role of SUMO-interacting motif in Daxx SUMO modification, subnuclear localization, and repression of sumoylated transcription factors. Mol. Cell 24:341-354.
45. Lyst MJ, Stancheva I. 2007. A role for SUMO modification in transcriptional repression and activation. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 35:1389 -1392.
46. Matunis MJ, Wu J, Blobel G. 1998. SUMO-1 modification and its role in targeting the Ran GTPase-activating protein, RanGAP1, to the nuclear pore complex. J. Cell Biol. 140:499 -509.
47. Nolo R, Abbott LA, Bellen HJ. 2000. Senseless, a Zn finger transcription factor, is necessary and sufficient for sensory organ development in Drosophila. Cell 102:349 -362.
48. Pauley S, Kopecky B, Beisel K, Soukup G, Fritzsch B. 2008. Stem cells and molecular strategies to restore hearing. Panminerva Med. 50:41-53.
49. Powell LM, Deaton AM, Wear MA, Jarman AP. 2008. Specificity of Atonal and Scute bHLH factors: analysis of cognate E box binding sites and the influence of Senseless. Genes Cells 13:915-929.
50. Ramain P, Heitzler P, Haenlin M, Simpson P. 1993. pannier, a negative regulator of achaete and scute in Drosophila, encodes a zinc finger protein with homology to the vertebrate transcription factor GATA-1. Development 119:1277-1291.
51. Rodriguez MS, Dargemont C, Hay RT. 2001. SUMO-1 conjugation in vivo requires both a consensus modification motif and nuclear targeting. J. Biol. Chem. 276:12654 -12659.
52. Saitoh H, Hinchey J. 2000. Functional heterogeneity of small ubiquitinrelated protein modifiers SUMO-1 versus SUMO-2/3. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 6252-6258.
53. Salzberg A, et al. 1994. Mutations affecting the pattern of the PNS in Drosophila reveal novel aspects of neuronal development. Neuron 13: 269-287.
54. Schmidt D, Muller S. 2002. Members of the PIAS family act as SUMO ligases for c-Jun and p53 and repress p53 activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99:2872-2877.
55. Shroyer NF, Wallis D, Venken KJ, Bellen HJ, Zoghbi HY. 2005. Gfi1 functions downstream of Math1 to control intestinal secretory cell subtype allocation and differentiation. Genes Dev. 19:2412-2417.
56. Smet-Nocca C, Wieruszeski JM, Leger H, Eilebrecht S, Benecke A. 2011. SUMO-1 regulates the conformational dynamics of thymine-DNA glycosylase regulatory domain and competes with its DNA binding activity. BMC Biochem. 12:4. doi:10.1186/1471-2091-12-4.
57. Smith M, Bhaskar V, Fernandez J, Courey AJ. 2004. Drosophila Ulp1, a nuclear pore-associated SUMO protease, prevents accumulation of cytoplasmic SUMO conjugates. J. Biol. Chem. 279:43805- 43814.
58. Takahashi H, Hatakeyama S, Saitoh H, Nakayama KI. 2005. Noncovalent SUMO-1 binding activity of thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) is required for its SUMO-1 modification and colocalization with the promyelocytic leukemia protein. J. Biol. Chem. 280:5611-5621.
59. Takanaka Y, Courey AJ. 2005. SUMO enhances vestigial function during wing morphogenesis. Mech. Dev. 122:1130 -1137.
60. Tatham MH, et al. 2001. Polymeric chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 are conjugated to protein substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9. J. Biol. Chem. 276:35368 -35374.
61. Terui Y, Saad N, Jia S, McKeon F, Yuan J. 2004. Dual role of sumoylation in the nuclear localization and transcriptional activation of NFAT1. J. Biol. Chem. 279:28257-28265.
62. Verger A, Perdomo J, Crossley M. 2003. Modification with SUMO. A role in transcriptional regulation. EMBO Rep. 4:137-142.
63. Wallis D, et al. 2003. The zinc finger transcription factor Gfi1, implicated in lymphomagenesis, is required for inner ear hair cell differentiation and survival. Development 130:221-232.
64. Wei F, Scholer HR, Atchison ML. 2007. Sumoylation of Oct4 enhances its stability, DNA binding, and transactivation. J. Biol. Chem. 282:21551- 21560.
65. Witt LM, et al. 2010. Atonal, Senseless, and Abdominal-A regulate rhomboid enhancer activity in abdominal sensory organ precursors. Dev. Biol. 344:1060 -1070.
66. Yang Z, Ding K, Pan L, Deng M, Gan L. 2003. Math5 determines the competence state of retinal ganglion cell progenitors. Dev. Biol. 264:240- 254.
67. Yoon H, Lee DJ, Kim MH, Bok J. 2011. Identification of genes concordantly expressed with Atoh1 during inner ear development. Anat. Cell Biol. 44:69 -78.
68. Zhong S, et al. 2000. Role of SUMO-1-modified PML in nuclear body formation. Blood 95:2748 -2752.
69. zur Lage PI, Powell LM, Prentice DR, McLaughlin P, Jarman AP. 2004. EGF receptor signaling triggers recruitment of Drosophila sense organ precursors by stimulating proneural gene autoregulation. Dev. Cell 7:687- 696.
70. zur Lage PI, Prentice DR, Holohan EE, Jarman AP. 2003. The Drosophila proneural gene amos promotes olfactory sensillum formation and suppresses bristle formation. Development 130:4683- 4693.
71. Zweidler-Mckay PA, Grimes HL, Flubacher MM, Tsichlis PN. 1996. Gfi-1 encodes a nuclear zinc finger protein that binds DNA and functions as a transcriptional repressor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16:4024-4034.