The Coverage Issue

PRIMUS

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 303-316

  Yoshinobu, Stan ^a   Jones, Matthew G ^b  

^a CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coverage; inquiry based learning; mathematics education research; Moore method; traditional lecture method

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863922944     PISSN: 10511970     EISSN: 19354053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10511970.2010.507622     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Boaler, J. 1998. Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29: 41-62.
2. Boaler, J. and Staples, M. 2008. Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110: 608-645.
3. Cazden, C. and Mehan, H. 1990. "Principles from sociology and anthropology: Context, code, classroom, and culture". In The Knowledge Base for Beginning Teachers, Edited by: Reynolds, M. C. 47-57. New York: Pergamon.
4. Chappell, K. K. 2006. "Effects of concept-based instruction on calculus students' acquisition of conceptual understanding and procedural skill". In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education VI, Edited by: Hitt, F., Harel, G. and Selden, A. 27-60. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
5. Coppin, C. A., Mahavier, W. T.May, E. L. 2009. The Moore Method-A Pathway to Learner-Centered Instruction, Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
6. Darken, B., Wynegar, R. and Kuhn, S. 2000. "Evaluating calculus reform: A review and a longitudinal study". In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV, Edited by: Dubinsky, E., Schoenfeld, A. H. and Kaput, J. 16-41. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
7. Harel, G. and Sowder, L. 1998. "Students' proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies". In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education III, Edited by: Schoenfeld, A. H., Kaput, J. and Dubinsky, E. 234-283. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
8. Housman, D. and Porter, M. 2003. Proof schemes and learning strategies of above-average mathematics students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53: 139-158.
9. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J. and Findell, B. 2001. Adding It up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics, Washington, DC: National Research Council.
10. Kwon, O.N., Rasmussen, C. and Allen, K. 2005. Students' retention of mathematical knowledge and skills in differential equations. School Science and Mathematics, 105: 227-239.
11. Mahavier, W.S. 1999. What is the Moore Method?. PRIMUS, 9: 339-254.
12. Mason, J. 2001. "Mathematical teaching practices at tertiary level: Working group report". In The Teaching and Learning of Mathematics at University Level: An ICMI Study, Edited by: Holton, D.A. 71-86. Hingham, MA: Kluwer.
13. Moore, R. C. 1994. Making the transition to formal proof. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27: 249-266.
14. Muis, K. R. 2004. Personal epistemology and mathematics: A critical review and synthesis of research. Review of Educational Research, 74: 317-377.
15. Rasmussen, C. and Kwon, O. N. 2007. An inquiry-oriented approach to undergraduate mathematics. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26: 189-194.
16. Schoenfeld, A. H. 1988. When good teaching leads to bad results: The disasters of "well-taught" mathematics courses. Educational Psychologist, 23: 145-166.
17. Selden, A. and Selden, J. 2003. Validation of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34: 4-36.
18. Selden, A., Selden, J., Hauk, S. and Mason, A. 2000. "Why can't calculus students access their knowledge to solve non-routine problems?". In Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education IV, Edited by: Dubinsky, E., Schoenfeld, A. H. and Kaput, J. 128-153. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
19. Selden, J., Selden, A. and Mason, A. 1994. "Even good calculus students can't solve nonroutine problems". In Research Issues in Undergraduate Mathematics Learning, MAA Notes No. 33, Edited by: Kaput, J. J. and Dubinsky, E. 19-26. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
20. Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. M. 1997. Talking about Leaving, Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
21. Smith, J. C. 2005. A sense-making approach to proof: Strategies of students in traditional and problem-based number theory courses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25: 73-90.
22. Weber, K. 2001. Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48: 101-119.