Distributions of cherries for two models of trees

Mathematical Biosciences

Volumn 164, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 81-92

  McKenzie, Andy ^a   Steel, Mike ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Phylogeny; Polya urn models; Trees; Yule model

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HYPOTHESIS; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; PHYLOGENY; PLANT; STANDARDIZATION; STOCHASTIC MODEL;

MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY;

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0034100582     PISSN: 00255564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0025-5564(99)00060-7     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kubo T., Iwasa Y. Inferring the rates of branching and extinction from molecular phylogenies. Evolution. 49:1995;694.
2. Raup D.M., Gould S.J., Schopf T.J.M., Simberloff D.S. Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity. J. Geol. 81(5):1973;525.
3. Gould S.J., Raup D.M., Sepkowski J.J., Schopf T.J.M., Simberloff D.S. The shape of evolution: a comparison of real and random clades. Paleobiology. 3:1977;23.
4. Savage H.M. The shape of evolution: systematic tree topology. Biolog. J. Linnean Soc. 20:1983;225.
5. Slowinski J.B., Guyer C. Testing the stochasticity of patterns of organismal diversity: an improved null model. Am. Natural. 134(6):1989;907.
6. Guyer C., Slowinski J.B. Comparisons of observed phylogenetic topologies with null expectations among three monophyletic lineages. Evolution. 45(2):1991;340.
7. Heard S.B. Patterns in tree balance among cladistic phenetic and randomly generated phylogenetic trees. Evolution. 46(6):1992;1818.
8. Kirkpatrick M., Slatkin M. Searching for evolutionary patterns in the shape of a phylogenetic tree. Evolution. 47(4):1993;1171.
9. Rogers J.S. Central moments and probability distribution of Colless's coefficient of tree imbalance. Evolution. 48(6):1994;2026.
10. Mooers A. Tree balance and tree completeness. Evolution. 49(2):1995;379.
11. Mooers A., Heard S.B. Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Quart. Rev. Biol. 72(1):1997;31.
12. R.D.M. Page, E.C. Holmes, Molecular Evolution: a Phylogenetic Approach, ch. 2, Blackwell Science, 1998, pp. 11-36.
13. Athreya K.B., Karlin S. Embedding of urn schemes into continuous time markov branching processes and related limit theorems. Ann. Math. Stat. 39:1968;1801.
14. K.B. Athreya, P.E. Ney, Branching Processes, Springer, Berlin, 1972, pp. 219-224.
15. Bagchi A., Pal A.K. Asymptotic normality in the generalized Polya-Eggenburger urn model with an application to computer data structures. SIAM J. Algebr. Discr. Meth. 6:1985;394.
16. Smythe R.T. Central limit theorems for urn models. Stochast. Proc. Appl. 65:1996;115.
17. Harding E.F. The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation. Adv. Appl. Probab. 3:1971;44.
18. Losos J.B., Adler F.R. Stumped by trees? a generalized null model for patterns of organismal diversity. Am. Natural. 145(3):1995;329.
19. Nee S., May R.M., Harvey P.H. The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 344:1994;305.
20. Steel M., Penny D. Distribution of tree comparison metrics some new results. System Biol. 42(2):1993;126.
21. D. Aldous, The continuum random tree II: an overview, in: M.T. Barlow, N.H. Bingham (Eds.), Stochastic Analysis, Cambridge University, Cambridge, 1991, p. 23.
22. Aldous D. The continuum random tree III. Ann. Probab. 21:1993;248.
23. Hendy M.D., Penny D. Branch and bound algorithms to determine minimal evolutionary trees. Math. Biosci. 59:1982;277.
24. Steel M.A. Distribution of the symmetric difference metric on phylogenetic trees. SIAM J. Discr. Math. 1(4):1988;541.
25. Härlin M. Biogeographic patterns and the evolution of Eureptanic nemerteans. Biolog. J. Linnean Soc. 58:1996;325.
26. Huelsenbeck J.P., Kirkpatrick M. Do phylogenetic methods produce trees with biased shapes? Evolution. 50(4):1996;1418.