Preliminary 2-year report on treatment outcomes for 6-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 279-289

  Pieri, Francesco ^a   Aldini, Nicolò Nicoli ^a   Fini, Milena ^a   Marchetti, Claudio ^a   Corinaldesi, Giuseppe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; ARTICLE; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTURE; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMAN; JAW DISEASE; MALE; MANDIBLE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PREMOLAR TOOTH; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ALVEOLAR BONE LOSS; BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; EDEMA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR DISEASES; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84863846548     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Soikkonen K, Ainamo A, Xie Q. Height of the residual ridge and radiographic appearance of bony structure in the jaws of clinically edentulous elderly people. J Oral Rehabil 1996; 23: 470-475.
2. Bryant SR. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11: 470-490.
3. Felice P, Pistilli R, Lizio G, Pellegrino G, Nisii A, Marchetti C. Inlay versus onlay iliac bone grafting in atrophic posterior mandible: A prospective controlled clinical trial for the comparison of two techniques. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11(suppl): e69-e82.
4. Fontana F, Santoro F, Maiorana C, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Simion M. Clinical and histologic evaluation of allogeneic bone matrix versus autogenous bone chips associated with titanium- reinforced e-PTFE membrane for vertical ridge augmentation: A prospective pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008; 23: 1003-1012.
5. Rosenquist B. Implant placement in combination with nerve transpositioning: Experiences with the first 100 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 522-531.
6. Jensen SS, Terheyden H. Bone augmentation procedures in localized defects in the alveolar ridge: Clinical results with different bone grafts and bone-substitute materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24(suppl): 218-236.
7. Romeo E, Ghisolfi M, Rozza R, Chiapasco M, Lops D. Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: A 3- to 14-year longitudinal study. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 586-592.
8. Grant BT, Pancko FX, Kraut RA. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: A retrospective study of 124 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 713-717.
9. Gentile MA, Chuang SK, Dodson TB. Survival estimates and risk factors for failure with 6 × 5.7-mm implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 930-937.
10. Oates TW, Dowell S, Robinson M, McMahan CA. Glycemic control and implant stabilization in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Dent Res 2009; 88: 367-371.
11. De Boever AL, Keersmaekers K, Vanmaele G, Kerschbaum T, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant-borne reconstructions after an observations period of at least 40 months. J Oral Rehabil 2006; 33: 833-839.
12. Trisi P, Rao W. Bone classification: Clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10: 1-7.
13. Chung DM, Oh TJ, Shotwell JL, Misch CE, Wang HL. Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces. J Periodontol 2006; 77: 1410-1420.
14. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: Clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 26-35.
15. Cannizzaro G, Leone M, Esposito M. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery in the edentulous maxilla: 1-year follow-up of a single cohort study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 87-95.
16. Abrahamsson I, Linder E, Lang NP. Implant stability in relation to osseointegration: An experimental study in the Labrador dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 313-318.
17. Schincaglia GP, Marzola R, Scapoli C, Scotti R. Immediate loading of dental implants supporting fixed partial dentures in the posterior mandible: A randomized controlled split-mouth study-Machined versus titanium oxide implant surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 35-46.
18. Gomez-Polo M, Bartens F, Sala L, Tamini F, Celemin A, Del Rio J. The correlation between crown-implant ratios and marginal bone resorption: A preliminary clinical study. Int J Prosthodont 2010; 23: 33-37.
19. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: Towards optimizing treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 641.
20. Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Bürgin W, Brägger U, Lang NP. Patients’ satisfaction following implant therap. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005; 16: 185-193.
21. Sohn DS, Kim WS, Lee WH, Jung HS, Shin IH. A retrospective study of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants in restoring the edentulous posterior mandible: Up to 9 years of functioning. Implant Dent 2010; 19: 409-418.
22. Friberg B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000; 2: 184-189.
23. Cecchinato D, Bengazi F, Blasi G, Botticelli D, Cardarelli I, Gualini F. Bone level alterations at implants placed in the posterior segments of the dentition: Outcome of submerged/non-submerged healin. A 5-year multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008; 19: 429-431.
24. Urdaneta RA, Rodriguez S, McNeil DC, Weed M, Chuang SK. The effect of increased crown-to-implant ratio on single-tooth locking-taper implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 729-743.
25. Pjetursson BE, Brägger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18(suppl 3): 97-113 [erratum 2008; 19: 326-328].
26. Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009; 11: 338-347.
27. Bilhan H, Kutay O, Arat S, Cekici A, Cehreli MC. Astra Tech, Brånemark, and ITI implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: Two-year results. Implant Dent 2010; 19: 437-446.
28. Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segalà-Torres M, et al. The effect of interimplant distance on the height of the interimplant bone crest when using platform-switched implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009; 29: 141-151.
29. Bratu EA, Tandlich M, Shapira L. A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: A prospective clinical study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20: 827-832.
30. Tawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 275-282.