A retrospective study of sintered porous-surfaced dental implants in restoring the edentulous posterior mandible: Up to 9 years of functioning

Implant Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 409-418

  Sohn, Dong Seok ^a   Kim, Woo Sung ^a   Lee, Won Hyuk ^a   Jung, Heui Seung ^b   Shin, Im Hee ^a  

^a Catholic University of Daegu   (South Korea)

^b Seo Mun Dental Clinic   (South Korea)

Author keywords

crown to root ratio; implant size; porous surfaced dental implant; posterior mandible; survival rate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DENTURE; EDENTULOUSNESS; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; POROSITY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SPLINT; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURVIVAL; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CROWNS; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MANDIBLE; POROSITY; RADIOGRAPHY, BITEWING; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPLINTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77958516561     PISSN: 10566163     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181ed2cee     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981;10:387-416.
2. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Bränemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol. 1991;62:2-4.
3. Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, et al. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Bränemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10:33-42.
4. Naert I, Koutsikakis G, Duyck J, et al. Biologic outcome of implant-supported restorations in the treatment of partial edentulism. Part I: A longitudinal clinical evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:381-389.
5. Weng D, Jacobson Z, Tarnow D, et al. A prospective multicenter clinical trial of 3i machined-surface implants: Results after 6 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18:417-423.
6. Morris HF, Ochi S. Hydroxyapatitecoated implants: A case for their use. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;56:1303-1311.
7. Deporter DA, Todescan R, Watson PA, et al. A prospective human clinical trial of endopore dental implants in restoring the partially edentulous maxilla using fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001;16:527-536.
8. Gonshor A, Goveia G, Sotirakis E. A prospective, multicenter, 4-year study of the ACE Surgical resorbable blast media implant. J Oral Implantol. 2003;29:174-180.
9. Fugazzotto PA. Shorter implants in clinical practice: Rationale and treatment results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2008;23:487-496.
10. Wennerberg A, Hallgren C, Johansson C, et al. A histomorphometric evaluation of screw-shaped implants each prepared with two surface roughnesses. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1998;9:11-19.
11. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, et al. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol. 2002;28:2-8.
12. Piattelli A, Corigliano M, Scarano A, et al. Bone reactions to early occlusal loading of two-stage titanium plasma-sprayed implants: Apilot study in monkeys. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997;17:162-169.
13. Cook SD, Kay JF, Thomas KA, et al. Interface mechanics and histology of titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated titanium for dental implant applications. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1987;2:15-22.
14. Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF. Evaluation of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1987;45:601-607.
15. Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, et al. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface: A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997;8:442-447.
16. Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rao W, et al. Bone-implant contact and bone quality: Evaluation of expected and actual bone contact on machined and osseotite implant surfaces. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22:535-545.
17. Orsini G, Assenza B, Scarano A, et al. Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15:779-784.
18. Cochran DL, Buser D, Bruggenkate CM, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: Early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13:144-153.
19. Deporter DA, Watson PA, Pilliar RM, et al. A histological comparison in the dog of porous-coated vs. threaded dental implants. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1138-1145.
20. Levy D, Deporter DA, Watson PA, et al. Periodontal parameters around porous-coated dental implants after 3 to 4 years supporting overdentures. J Clin Periodontol. 1996;23:517-522.
21. Pilliar RM. Overview of surface variability of metallic endosseous dental implants: Textured and porous surfacestructured designs. Implant Dent. 1998;7: 305-314.
22. Rokni S, Todescan R, Watson P, et al. An assessment of crown-to-root ratios with short sintered porous-surfaced implants supporting prostheses in partially edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2005;20:69-76.
23. Deporter DA, Caudry S, Kermalli J, et al. Further data on the predictability of the indirect sinus elevation procedure used with short, sintered, porous-surfaced dental implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2005;25:585-593.
24. Deporter D, Ogiso B, Sohn DS, et al. Ultrashort sintered porous-surfaced dental implants used to replace posterior teeth. J Periodontol. 2008;79:1280-1286.
25. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallus T, et al. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implants supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:129-134.
26. Jensen OT, Shulman LB, Block MS, et al. Report of the sinus consensus conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:11-45.
27. Artzi Z, Carmeli G, Kozlovsky A. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in 5-10 years in function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:85-93.
28. Carlsson L, Röstlund T, Albrektsson B, et al. Removal torques for polished and rough titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:21-24.
29. Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, et al. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997;12:486-494.
30. Romeo E, Lops D, Amorfini L, et al. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of small-diameter (3.3-mm) implants followed for 1-7 years: A longitudinal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17:139-148.
31. Deporter D, Watson P, Pharoah M, et al. Ten-year results of a prospective study using porous-surfaced dental implants and a mandibular overdenture. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4:183-189.
32. Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20:476-485.
33. Ivanoff CJ, Gröndahl K, Sennerby L, et al. Influence of variations in implant diameters. A 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14:173-180.
34. Bahat O, Handelsman M. Use of wide implants and double implants in the posterior jaw: A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996;11:379-386.
35. Tawil G, Mawla M, Gottlow J. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of the 5-mm diameter regular-platform Brånemark fixture: 2- to 5-year followup. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4: 16-26.
36. Mordenfeld MH, Johansson A, Hedin M, et al. A retrospective clinical study of wide-diameter implants used in posterior edentulous areas. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:387-392.
37. Degidi M, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, et al. Wide-diameter implants: Analysis of clinical outcome of 304 fixtures. J Periodontol. 2007;78:52-58.
38. Pilliar RM, Cameron HU, Binnington AG, et al. Bone ingrowth and stress shielding with a porous surface coated fracture fixation plate. J Biomed Mater Res. 1979;13:799-810.
39. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implantsupported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13:204-211.
40. Weiss CM, Weiss A. Principles and Practice of Implant Dentistry. 1st ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2001:36-37.
41. Misch CE. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. 2nd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby; 1999:338-339.
42. Schulte J, Flores AM, Weed M. Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98:1-5.
43. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, et al. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007;18:707-714.