Standardized AP radiographs do not provide reliable diagnostic measures for the assessment of acetabular retroversion

Journal of Orthopaedic Research

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2012, Pages 1369-1376

  Wassilew, Georgi I ^a   Heller, Markus O ^a   Diederichs, Gerd ^a   Janz, Viktor ^a   Wenzl, Markus ^a   Perka, Carsten ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

cross over sign; femoroacetabular impingement; hip; posterior wall sign; three dimensional analysis

Indexed keywords

ACETABULAR RETROVERSION; ACETABULUM; ADULT; ANTERIOR POSTERIOR AXIS; ARTICLE; BONE RETROVERSION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSOVER SIGN; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; FEMALE; FEMOROACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; POSTERIOR WALL SIGN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION PROCESS;

FEMORACETABULAR IMPINGEMENT; HUMANS; PELVIS; POSTURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84863843851     PISSN: 07360266     EISSN: 1554527X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22086     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, et al. 2003. Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417: 112-120. (Pubitemid 37499516)
2. Ganz R, Leunig M, Leunig-Ganz K, et al. 2008. The etiology of osteoarthritis of the hip: an integrated mechanical concept. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 264-272. (Pubitemid 351912907)
3. Reynolds D, Lucas J, Klaue K,. 1999. Retroversion of the acetabulum. A cause of hip pain. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81: 281-288. (Pubitemid 29327067)
4. Anderson LA, Peters CL, Park BB, et al. 2009. Acetabular cartilage delamination in femoroacetabular impingement. Risk factors and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91: 305-313.
5. Ganz R, Gill TJ, Gautier E, et al. 2001. Surgical dislocation of the adult hip a technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83: 1119-1124.
6. Kim WY, Hutchinson CE, Andrew JG, et al. 2006. The relationship between acetabular retroversion and osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88: 727-729. (Pubitemid 43971135)
7. Siebenrock KA, Schoeniger R, Ganz R,. 2003. Anterior femoro-acetabular impingement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A: 278-286. (Pubitemid 36538791)
8. Heyworth BE, Shindle MK, Voos JE, et al. 2007. Radiologic and intraoperative findings in revision hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 23: 1295-1302. (Pubitemid 350192141)
9. Philippon MJ, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, et al. 2007. Revision hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 35: 1918-1921. (Pubitemid 350029354)
10. Clohisy JC, Carlisle JC, Trousdale R, et al. 2009. Radiographic evaluation of the hip has limited reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467: 666-675.
11. Giori NJ, Trousdale RT,. 2003. Acetabular retroversion is associated with osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417: 263-269. (Pubitemid 37499532)
12. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R,. 2003. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407: 241-248. (Pubitemid 36176514)
13. Vandenbussche E, Saffarini M, Taillieu F, et al. 2008. The asymmetric profile of the acetabulum. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 417-423. (Pubitemid 351912909)
14. Tannast M, Mistry S, Steppacher SD, et al. 2008. Radiographic analysis of femoroacetabular impingement with Hip2Norm-reliable and validated. J Orthop Res 26: 1199-1205.
15. Tannast M, Murphy SB, Langlotz F, et al. 2006. Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays-a comparison of six parameters. Skelet Radiol 35: 149-155. (Pubitemid 43239228)
16. Tannast M, Zheng G, Anderegg C, et al. 2005. Tilt and rotation correction of acetabular version on pelvic radiographs. Clin Orthop Relat Res 438: 182-190. (Pubitemid 41254335)
17. Zheng G, Tannast M, Anderegg C, et al. 2007. Hip2Norm: an object-oriented cross-platform program for 3D analysis of hip joint morphology using 2D pelvic radiographs. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 87: 36-45. (Pubitemid 46879958)
18. Perreira AC, Hunter JC, Laird T, et al. 2011. Multilevel measurement of acetabular version using 3-D CT-generated models: implications for hip preservation surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469: 552-561.
19. Wiberg G,. 1939. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint. Acta Chir Scand 83: 29-38.
20. Murphy SB, Ganz R, Muller ME,. 1995. The prognosis in untreated dysplasia of the hip. A study of radiographic factors that predict the outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77: 985-989.
21. Steppacher SD, Tannast M, Werlen S, et al. 2008. Femoral morphology differs between deficient and excessive acetabular coverage. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 782-790.
22. Wassilew GI, Janz V, Heller M, et al. 2011. Validation of a CT image based software for three-dimensional measurement of acetabular cup orientation. Technol Health Care 19: 185-193.
23. Puls M, Ecker TM, Steppacher SD, et al. 2011. Automated detection of the osseous acetabular rim using three-dimensional models of the pelvis. Comput Biol Med 41: 285-291.
24. Jamali AA, Mladenov K, Meyer DC, et al. 2007. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs to assess acetabular retroversion: high validity of the "cross-over-sign ". J Orthop Res 25: 758-765. (Pubitemid 46831884)
25. Werner CM, Copeland CE, Stromberg J, et al. 2010. Correlation of the cross-over ratio of the cross-over sign on conventional pelvic radiographs with computed tomography retroversion measurements. Skelet Radiol 39: 655-660.
26. Dandachli W, Islam SU, Liu M, et al. 2009. Three-dimensional CT analysis to determine acetabular retroversion and the implications for the management of femoro-acetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91: 1031-1036.
27. Kalberer F, Sierra RJ, Madan SS, et al. 2008. Ischial spine projection into the pelvis: a new sign for acetabular retroversion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466: 677-683. (Pubitemid 351903829)
28. Fujii M, Nakashima Y, Yamamoto T, et al. 2010. Acetabular retroversion in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92: 895-903.
29. Li PL, Ganz R,. 2003. Morphologic features of congenital acetabular dysplasia: one in six is retroverted. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416: 245-253. (Pubitemid 37413645)
30. Nehme A, Trousdale R, Tannous Z, et al. 2009. Developmental dysplasia of the hip: is acetabular retroversion a crucial factor? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95: 511-519.
31. Troelsen A, Romer L, Jacobsen S, et al. 2010. Cranial acetabular retroversion is common in developmental dysplasia of the hip as assessed by the weight bearing position. Acta Orthop 81: 436-441.
32. Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, et al. 1988. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias. Technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232: 26-36.
33. Ito H, Matsuno T, Hirayama T, et al. 2009. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of non-osteoarthritic adult acetabular dysplasia. Skelet Radiol 38: 131-139.
34. Kiyama T, Naito M, Shiramizu K, et al. 2009. Postoperative acetabular retroversion causes posterior osteoarthritis of the hip. Int Orthop 33: 625-631.
35. Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME,. 2003. Lessons learned after more than 250 periacetabular osteotomies. Acta Orthop Scand 74: 119-126. (Pubitemid 36628204)
36. Zheng G, Zhang X, Steppacher SD, et al. 2009. HipMatch: an object-oriented cross-platform program for accurate determination of cup orientation using 2D-3D registration of single standard X-ray radiograph and a CT volume. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 95: 236-248.
37. Tonnis D, Heinecke A,. 1999. Acetabular and femoral anteversion: relationship with osteoarthritis of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81: 1747-1770.
38. Pospischill M, Kranzl A, Attwenger B, et al. 2010. Minimally invasive compared with traditional transgluteal approach for total hip arthroplasty: a comparative gait analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92: 328-337.
39. Ehrig RM, Heller MO, Kratzenstein S, et al. 2011. The SCoRE residual: a quality index to assess the accuracy of joint estimations. J Biomech 44: 1400-1404.
40. Heller MO, Kratzenstein S, Ehrig RM, et al. 2011. The weighted optimal common shape technique improves identification of the hip joint center of rotation in vivo. J Orthop Res 29: 1470-1475.
41. Taylor WR, Kornaropoulos EI, Duda GN, et al. 2010. Repeatability and reproducibility of OSSCA, a functional approach for assessing the kinematics of the lower limb. Gait Posture 32: 231-236.