Estimating the variance of male fecundity from genotypes of progeny arrays: Evaluation of the Bayesian forward approach

Methods in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 349-361

  Klein, Etienne K ^a,b   Carpentier, Florence H ^a   Oddou Muratorio, Sylvie ^b  

^a INRA   (France)

^b French National Institute for Agriculture   (France)

Author keywords

Long distance dispersal; Male reproductive success; Mating system; Microsatellite markers; Mixed effects mating models; Paternity analysis; Pollen dispersal; Progeny array

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863784256     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2041210X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00085.x     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adams, W.T. & Birkes, D.S. (1991) Estimating mating patterns in forest tree populations. Biochemichal Markers in the Population Genetics of Forest Trees (eds S. Fineschi, M.E. Malvolti, F. Cannata & H.H. Hattemer), pp. 157-172. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.
2. Adams, W.T., Griffin, A.R. & Moran, G.F. (1992) Using paternity analysis to measure effective pollen dispersal in plant populations. American Naturalist, 140, 762-780.
3. Austerlitz, F. & Smouse, P.E. (2002) Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. IV. Estimating the dispersal parameter. Genetics, 161, 355-363.
4. Austerlitz, F., Dick, C.W., Dutech, C., Klein, E.K., Oddou-Muratorio, S., Smouse, P.E. & Sork, V.L. (2004) Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve. Molecular Ecology, 13, 937-954.
5. Bacles, C.F.E., Burczyk, J., Lowe, A.J. & Ennos, R.A. (2005) Historical and contemporary mating patterns in remnant populations of the forest tree Fraxinus excelsior L. Evolution, 59, 979-990.
6. Broquet, T. & Petit, E.J. (2009) Molecular estimation of dispersal for ecology and population genetics. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 40, 193-216.
7. Burczyk, J., Lewandowski, A. & Chalupka, W. (2004) Local pollen dispersal and distant gene flow in Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Forest Ecology and Management, 197, 39-48.
8. Burczyk, J., Adams, W.T., Moran, G.F. & Griffin, A.R. (2002) Complex patterns of mating revealed in a Eucalyptus regnans seed orchard using allozyme markers and the neighbourhood model. Molecular Ecology, 11, 2379-2391.
9. Chakraborty, R., Meagher, T.R. & Smouse, P.E. (1988) Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity. Genetics, 118, 527-536.
10. Chenault, N., Dowkiw, A., Jorge, V., Villar, M., Juteau, M., Guerin, V. et al. (2008) Pollen flow between Lombardy poplar and natural populations of black poplar. In Proceedings of the IUFRO-CTIA 2008 Joint Conference, Quebec, August 25-28, 2008.
11. Chybicki, I.J. & Burczyk, J. (2010) NM+: software implementing parentage-based models for estimating gene dispersal and mating patterns in plants. Molecular Ecology, 10, 1071-1075.
12. Devlin, B. & Ellstrand, N.C. (1990) Male and female fertility variation in wild radish, a hermaphrodite. American Naturalist, 136, 87-107.
13. Devlin, B., Roeder, K. & Ellstrand, N.C. (1988) Fractional paternity assignment: theoretical development and comparison to other methods. Theoretical & Applied Genetics, 76, 369-380.
14. Ellstrand, N.C. (1992) Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos, 63, 77-86.
15. Fernandez, J. & Gonzalez-Martinez, S.C. (2009) Allocating individuals to avoid inbreeding in ex situ conservation plantations: so far, so good. Conservation Genetics, 10, 45-57.
16. Frankham, R. (1995) Effective population-size adult-population size ratios in wildife - A review. Genetical Research, 66, 95-107.
17. Garcia, C., Arroyo, J.M., Godoy, J.A. & Jordano, P. (2005) Mating patterns, pollen dispersal, and the ecological maternal neighbourhood in a Prunus mahaleb L. population. Molecular Ecology, 14, 1821-1830.
18. Gérard, P., Klein, E.K., Austerlitz, F., Fernandez-Majarres, J.F. & Frascaria-Lacoste, N. (2006) Assortative mating and differential male mating success in an ash hybrid zone population. BMC Evolutionary Biology, 6, 96.
19. Gimenez, O. & Choquet, R. (2010) Individual heterogeneity in studies on marked animals using numerical integration: capture-recapture mixed models. Ecology, 91, 148-154.
20. Goto, S., Shimatani, K., Yoshimaru, H. & Takahashi, Y. (2006) Fat-tailed gene flow in the dioecious canopy tree species Fraxinus mandshurica var. japonica revealed by microsatellites. Molecular Ecology, 15, 2985-2996.
21. Hereford, J., Hansen, T.F. & Houle, D. (2004) Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution, 58, 2133-2143.
22. Johnson, J.B. & Omland, K.S. (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 19, 101-108.
23. Kang, K.S., Bila, A.D., Harju, A.M. & Lindgren, D. (2003) Estimation of fertility variation in forest tree populations. Forestry, 76, 329-344.
24. Klein, E.K., Desassis, N. & Oddou-Muratorio, S. (2008) Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. IV. Whole interindividual variance of male fecundity estimated jointly with the dispersal kernel. Molecular Ecology, 17, 3323-3336.
25. Klein, E.K., Lavigne, C. & Gouyon, P.H. (2006) Mixing of propagules from discrete sources at long distance: comparing a dispersal tail to an exponential. BMC Ecology, 6, 3.
26. Marshall, T.C., Slate, J., Kruuk, L.E.B. & Pemberton, J.M. (1998) Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Molecular Ecology, 7, 639-655.
27. McCullagh, P. & Nelder, J.A. (1989) Generalized Linear Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
28. Meagher, T.R. (1986) Analysis of paternity within a population of Chamaelirium luteum. I. Identification of the most-likely male parents. American Naturalist, 128, 199-215.
29. Nielsen, R., Mattila, D.K., Clapham, P.J. & Palsboll, P.J. (2001) Statistical approaches to paternity analysis in natural populations and applications to the North Atlantic humpback whale. Genetics, 157, 1673-1682.
30. Oddou-Muratorio, S., Klein, E.K. & Austerlitz, F. (2005) Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. II. Pollen dispersal and heterogeneity in mating success inferred from parent-offspring analysis. Molecular Ecology, 14, 4441-4452.
31. Oddou-Muratorio, S., Klein, E.K. & Austerlitz, F. (2006) Real-time patterns of pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis III. Mating patterns and the ecological maternal neighborhood. American Journal of Botany, 93, 1650-1659.
32. Oddou-Muratorio, S., Aligon, C., Decroocq, S., Plomion, C., Lamant, T. & Mush-Demesure, B. (2001) Microsatellite primers for Sorbus torminalis and related species. Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 297-299.
33. Oddou-Muratorio, S., Houot, M.L., Demesure-Musch, B. & Austerlitz, F. (2003) Pollen flow in the wildservice tree, Sorbus torminalis (L.) Crantz. I. Evaluating the paternity analysis procedure in continuous populations. Molecular Ecology, 12, 3427-3439.
34. Oddou-Muratorio, S., Demesure-Musch, B., Pelissier, R. & Gouyon, P.H. (2004) Impacts of gene flow and logging history on the local genetic structure of a scattered tree species, Sorbus torminalis L. Crantz. Molecular Ecology, 13, 3689-3702.
35. Robledo-Arnuncio, J.J. & Austerlitz, F. (2006) Pollen dispersal in spatially aggregated populations. American Naturalist, 168, 500-511.
36. Robledo-Arnuncio, J.J., Austerlitz, F. & Smouse, P.E. (2006) A new method of estimating the pollen dispersal curve independently of effective density. Genetics, 173, 1033-1045.
37. Robledo-Arnuncio, J.J., Austerlitz, F. & Smouse, P.E. (2007) POLDISP: a software package for indirect estimation of contemporary pollen dispersal. Molecular Ecology Notes, 7, 763-766.
38. Robledo-Arnuncio, J.J. & Gil, L. (2005) Patterns of pollen dispersal in a small population of Pinus sylvestris L. revealed by total-exclusion paternity analysis. Heredity, 94, 13-22.
39. Savolainen, O., Pyhajarvi, T. & Knurr, T. (2007) Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 38, 595-619.
40. Shimatani, I.K. (2010) Spatially explicit neutral models for population genetics and community ecology: extension of the Neyman-Scott clustering process. Theoretical Population Biology, 77, 32-41.
41. Shimatani, K., Kimura, M., Kitamura, K., Suyama, Y., Isagi, Y. & Sugita, H. (2007) Determining the location of a deceased mother tree and estimating forest regeneration variables by use of microsatellites and spatial genetic models. Population Ecology, 49, 317-330.
42. Smouse, P.E. & Meagher, T.R. (1994) Genetic-analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L) Gray (Liliaceae). Genetics, 136, 313-322.
43. Smouse, P.E., Meagher, T.R. & Kobak, C.J. (1999) Parentage analysis in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) Gray (Liliaceae): why do some males have higher reproductive contributions? Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 1069-1077.
44. Smouse, P.E. & Sork, V.L. (2004) Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches. Forest Ecology And Management, 197, 21-38.
45. Sork, V.L., Nason, J., Campbell, D.R. & Fernandez, J.F. (1999) Landscape approaches to historical and contemporary gene flow in plants. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 219-224.
46. Streiff, R., Ducousso, A., Lexer, C., Steinkellner, H., Gloessl, J. & Kremer, A. (1999) Pollen dispersal inferred from paternity analysis in a mixed oak stand of Quercus robur L-and Q-petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Molecular Ecology, 8, 831-841.