Enabling large-scale deliberation using attention-mediation metrics

Computer Supported Cooperative Work

Volumn 21, Issue 4-5, 2012, Pages 449-473

  Klein, Mark ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Deliberation; Metrics

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; ARGUMENTATION SYSTEMS; CHAT ROOMS; COMPLEX ARGUMENT; DELIBERATION; GLOBAL SCALE; INTERNATIONAL SECURITY; METRICS; SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; WEB FORUMS;

CLIMATE CHANGE; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

INTERNET;

EID: 84863778438     PISSN: 09259724     EISSN: 15737551     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10606-012-9156-4     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Adomavicius, G., & Tuzhilin, A. (2005). Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 17(6), 734-749.
2. Benbasat, I., & Lim, J. (2000). Information technology support for debiasing group judgments: an empirical evaluation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83(1), 167-183.
3. Benkler, Y. (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. Yale University Press.
4. Boland, R. J., Maheshwari, A. K., Te'eni, D., Schwartz, D., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1992). Sharing Perspectives in Distributed Decision Making. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work.
5. Bolstad, W. M. (2010). Understanding Computational Bayesian Statistics. John Wiley.
6. Bonaccorsi, A., & Rossi, C. (2004). Altruistic individuals, selfish firms? The structure of motivation in Open Source software.
7. Cappella, J. N., Price, V., & Nir, L. (2002). Argument Repertoire as a Reliable and Valid Measure of Opinion Quality: Electronic Dialogue During Campaign 2000. Political Communication, 19 (1), 73-93.
8. Carr, C. S. (2003). Using computer supported argument visualization to teach legal argumentation. In P. A. Kirschner, S. J. B. Shum, & C. S. Carr (Eds.), Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making (pp. 75-96). Springer-Verlag.
9. Chklovski, T., Ratnakar, V., & Gil, Y. (2005). User interfaces with semi-formal representations: astudy of designing argumentation structures. Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces, 130-136.
10. Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 127-149). Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association.
11. Conklin, J. (2005). Dialogue Mapping: Building Shared Understanding of Wicked Problems. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
12. Convertino, G., Billman, D., Shrager, J., Pirolli, P., & Massar, J. P. (2008). The CACHE Study: Group Effects in Computer-Supported Collaborative Analysis. Journal of Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 17(4), 353-393.
13. Cook, M. B., & Smallman, H. S. (2007). Visual Evidence Landscapes: Reducing Bias in Collaborative Intelligence Analysis. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings.
14. Dennis, A. R., & Valacich, J. S. (1993). Computer brainstorms: More heads are better than one. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 531-537.
15. Eemeren, F. H. v., & Grootendorst, R. (2003). A Systematic Theory of Argumentation: The Pragmadialectical Approach. Cambridge University Press.
16. Erickson, T., Halverson, C., Kellogg, W. A., Laff, M., & Wolf, T. (2002). Social Translucence: Designing Social Infrastructures that Make Collective Activity Visible. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 40-44.
17. Farnham, S., Chesley, H. R., McGhee, D. E., Kawal, R., & Landau, J. (2000). Structured online interactions: improving the decision-making of small discussion groups. Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
18. Finholt, T. A. (2002). Collaboratories. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36 (1), 73-107.
19. Gladwell, M. (2002). The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference. Back Bay Books.
20. Gopal, A., & Prasad, P. (2000). Understanding GDSS in Symbolic Context: Shifting the Focus from Technology to Interaction. MIS Quarterly, 24(3), 509-546.
21. Group, R. D. F. D. A. W. (2008). SPARQL Query Language for RDF. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfsparql-query/.
22. Hars, A., & Ou, S. (2002). Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(3), 25-39.
23. Heng, M. S. H., & de Moor, A. (2003). From Habermas' s communicative theory to practice on the internet. Information Systems Journal, 13(4), 331-352.
24. Householder, A. S. (1958). Unitary Triangularization of a Nonsymmetric Matrix. Journal of the ACM, 5(4), 339-342.
25. Iandoli, L., Klein, M., & Zollo, G. (2009). Enabling on-line deliberation and collective decision-making through large-scale argumentation: a new approach to the design of an Internet-based mass collaboration platform. International Journal of Decision Support System Technology, 1(1), 69-91.
26. Johnson, E. M., & Halpin, S. M. (1974). Multistage inference models for intelligence analysis.
27. Jonassen, D., & Jr, H. R. (2005). Mapping alternative discourse structures onto computer conferences. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 1(1/2), 113-129.
28. Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., amp; Dimopoulos, S. (2004). AWeb-Based System for Supporting Structured Collaboration in the Public Sector. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 218-225.
29. Kirschner, P. A., Shum, S. J. B., & Carr, C. S. (2003). Visualizing Argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer.
30. Kittur, A., Suh, B., Pendleton, B. A., & Chi, E. H. (2007). He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems.
31. Klein, M. (2003). A Knowledge-Based Methodology for Designing Reliable Multi-Agent Systems. In P. Giorgini, J. P. Mueller, & J. Odell (Eds.), Agent-Oriented Software Engineering IV (Vol. 2935, pp. 85-95). Springer-Verlag
32. Klein, M. (2007). The MIT Collaboratorium: Enabling Effective Large-Scale Deliberation for Complex Problems.
33. Klein, M., & Bernstein, A. (2004). Towards High-Precision Service Retrieval. IEEE Internet Computing Journal, 8(1), 30-36.
34. Klein, M., & Iandoli, L. (2008). Supporting Collaborative Deliberation Using a Large-Scale Argumentation System: The MIT Collaboratorium. Directions and Implications of Advanced Computing; Conference on Online Deliberation (DIAC-2008/OD2008).
35. Klein, M., Sayama, H., Faratin, P., & Bar-Yam, Y. (2003). The Dynamics of Collaborative Design: Insights From Complex Systems and Negotiation Research. Concurrent Engineering Research & Applications, 11(3), 201-210.
36. Kramer, K., & King, J. (1988). Computer-Based Systems for Coperative Work and Group Decision Making. Computing Surveys, 20(June), 115-146.
37. Lakhani, K. R., & Wolf, R. G. (2005). Why Hackers Do What They Do: Understanding Motivation and Effort in Free/Open Source Software Projects. In J. Feller, B. Fitzgerald, S. Hissam, & K. R. Lakhani (Eds.), Perspectives on Free and Open Source Software. MIT Press.
38. Lowrance, J. D., Harrison, I. W., & Rodriguez, A. C. (2001). Capturing Analytic Thought. First International Conference on Knowledge Capture, 84-91.
39. Luppicini, R. (2007). Review of computer mediated communication research for education. Instructional Science, 35(2), 141-185.
40. Macaulay, L. A., & Alabdulkarim, A. (2005). Facilitation of e-Meetings: State-of-the-Art Review. e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service (EEE'05).
41. Moor, A. d., & Aakhus, M. (2006). Argumentation Support: From Technologies to Tools. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 93.
42. Nisbet, D. (2004). Measuring the Quantity and Quality of Online Discussion Group Interaction. Journal of eLiteracy, 1, 122-139.
43. Pervan, G. P., & Atkinson, D. J. (1995). GDSS research: An overview and historical analysis. Group Decision and Negotiation, 4(6), 475-483.
44. Poole, M. S., Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1988). Conflict Management and Group Decision Support Systems. Proceedings from Proceedings of Computer Supported Cooperative Work.
45. Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. ACM SIGMIS Database, 35(1), 6-36.
46. Rahwan, I. (2008). Mass argumentation and the semantic web. Journal of Web Semantics, 6(1), 29-37.
47. Reagan-Cirincione, P. (1994). Improving the accuracy of group judgment: a process intervention combining group facilitation, social judgment analysis, and information technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 58(2), 246-270.
48. Roberts, J. E. F. F. R. E. Y., Hann, I. L.-H. O. R. N., & Slaughter, S. A. N. D. R. A. (2006). Understanding theMotivations, Participation and Performance of Open Source Software Developers: A Longitudinal Study of the Apache Projects. Management Science, 52(7), 984-999.
49. Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental Study of Inequality and Unpredictability in an Artificial Cultural Market. Science, 311(5762), 854-856.
50. Schulz-Hardt, S., Frey, D., Luthgens, C., & Moscovici, S. (2000). Biased information search in group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 655-669.
51. Shrager, J., Billman, D., Convertino, G., Massar, J. P., & Pirolli, P. (2010). Soccer Science and the Bayes Community: Exploring the Cognitive Implications of Modern Scientific Communication. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2(1), 53-72.
52. Shum, S. B., Liddo, A. D., Iandoli, L., & Quinto, I. (2012). A Debate Dashboard to Support the Adoption of Online Knowledge Mapping Tools. VINE Journal of information and Knowledge Management Systems.
53. Shum, S. J. B., Selvin, A. M., Sierhuis, M., Conklin, J., & Haley, C. B. (2006). Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale: 15 Years on from gIBIS and QOC. In A. H. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik, & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale Management in Software Engineering. Springer-Verlag.
54. Smallman, H. S. (2008). JIGSAW - Joint Intelligence Graphical Situation Awareness Web for collaborative intelligence analysis. In M. P. Letsky, N. Warner, S. Fiore, & C. A. P. Smith (Eds.), Macrocognition in Teams: Theories and Methodologies (pp. 321-337). Aldershot, UK.: Ashgate.
55. Spatariu, A., Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2004). Defining and Measuring Quality in Online Discussions. The Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 2(4).
56. Steenbergen, M. R., Bachtiger, A., Sporndli, M., & Steiner, J. (2003). Measuring political deliberation: a discourse quality index. Comparative European Politics, 1(1), 21-48.
57. Stromer-Galley, J. (2007). Measuring deliberation's content: A coding scheme. Journal of Public Deliberation, 3(1), 12.
58. Sunstein, C. R. (2006). Infotopia: How Many Minds Produce Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
59. Surowiecki, J. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. Anchor.
60. Tapscott, D., & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Portfolio Hardcover.
61. Trénel, M. (2004). Measuring the quality of online deliberation. Coding scheme 2.4. Social Science Research Center Berlin, Germany. Available at: www.wz-berlin.de/online-mediation/files/publications/quod-2-4.pdf.
62. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131.
63. Viegas, F. B., Wattenberg, M., & Dave, K. (2004). Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations. SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems.
64. Walton, D. N. (2005). Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation (Critical Reasoning and Argumentation). Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press.
65. Walton, D. N., & Krabbe, E. C. W. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.