Understanding Voters' Preferences: How the Electorate's Complexity Affects Prediction Accuracy and Wishful Thinking among Politicians with Respect to Election Outcomes

Kyklos

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 340-370

  Jottier, Dimi ^a   Ashworth, John ^b   Heyndels, Bruno ^a  

^a VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^b DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DECISION MAKING; DEMOCRACY; ELECTORAL GEOGRAPHY; ERROR ANALYSIS; HETEROGENEITY; PARTY POLITICS; POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; VOTING BEHAVIOR;

BELGIUM;

EID: 84863593427     PISSN: 00235962     EISSN: 14676435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6435.2012.00542.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aistrup, Joseph. (2004). Constituency diversity and party competition: A county and state level analysis. Political Research Quarterly. 57: 267-281.
2. Akerlof, George A. and William T. Dickens (1982). The economic consequences of cognitive dissonance. American Economic Review. 72: 307-319.
3. Alesina, Alberto, Reza Baqir and William Easterly (1999). Public Goods and ethnic Divisions, The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 64: 1243-1284.
4. Ashworth, John, Bruno Heyndels and Carine Smolders (2002). Redistribution as a local public good: an empirical test for flemish municipalities, Kyklos. 55: 27-56.
5. Ashworth, John and Bruno Heyndels (2005). Government fragmentation and budgetary policy in 'good' and 'bad' times in Flemish municipalities. Economics and Politics. 17: 245-264.
6. Ashworth, John, Benny Geys and Bruno Heyndels (2006). Everyone likes a winner: An empirical test of the effect of electoral closeness on turnout in a context of expressive voting. Public Choice. 128: 383-406.
7. Babcock, Linda and George Loewenstein (1997). Explaining Bargaining Impasses: The Role of Self-Serving Biases, Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11: 109-126.
8. Babad, Elisha, Michael Hills and Michael O'Driscoll (1992). Factors influencing wishful thinking and predictions of election outcomes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 13: 461-476.
9. Babad, Elisha. (1995). Can accurate knowledge reduce wishful thinking in voters' predictions of election outcomes? The Journal of Psychology. 129: 285-300.
10. Bailey, Michael and David W. Brady (1998). Heterogeneity and representation: the senate and free trade. American Journal of Political Science. 42: 524-544.
11. Bishin, Benjamin G., Jay K. Dow and James Adams (2006). Does democracy "suffer" from diversity? Issue representation and diversity in senate elections. Public Choice. 129: 201-215.
12. Bond, John. (1983). The influence of constituency diversity on electoral competition in voting for congress, 1974-1978. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 8: 201-217.
13. Chesher, Andrew, and Margaret Irish. (1987). Residual Analysis in the Grouped and Censored Normal Linear Model. Journal of Econometrics. 34: 33-61.
14. Dagenais, Marcel G. and Denyse L. Dagenais (1997). Higher Moment Estimators for Linear Regression Models with Errors in Variables. Journal of Econometrics. 76: 193-221.
15. Dhrymes, Phoebus J. (1986). Limited Dependent Variables. In Zvi Grilcihes and Michael G. Intriligator (eds) Handbook of Econometrics, vol. III, Amsterdam: North Holland. 1567-1631
16. Dolan, Kathleen A. and Thomas M. Holbrook (2001). Knowing versus caring: The role of affect and cognition in political perception. Political Psychology. 22: 27-44.
17. Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
18. Easterly, William and Ross Levine (1997). Africa's Growth Tragedy: Policies and Ethnic Divisions, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 62: 1203-1250.
19. Ensley, Michael J., Scott de Marchi and Michael C. Munger (2007). Candidate uncertainty, mental models, and complexity: some experimental results: Public Choice. 132: 231-246.
20. Ensley, Michael J., Michael W. Tofias and Scott de Marchi (2009). District complexity as an advantage in congressional elections. American Journal of Political Science. 53: 990-1005.
21. Fenno, Richard. (1978). Home style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
22. Gerber, Elisabeth R. and Jeffrey B. Lewis (2004). Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Political Representation. Journal of Political Economy. 112: 1364-1383.
23. Geys, Benny. (2006). District magnitude, social heterogeneity and local party system fragmentation. Party Politics. 12: 281-297.
24. Goeminne, Stijn, Benny Geys and Carine Smolders (2008). Political fragmentation and projected tax revenues: evidence from Flemish municipalities. International Tax and Public Finance. 15: 297-315.
25. Granberg, Donald and Sören Holmberg (1988). The political system matters: social psychology and voting behaviour in Sweden and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
26. Granberg, Donald and Sören Holmbergh (2002). A mass elite comparison of wishful thinking. Social Science Quarterly. 83: 1079-1085.
27. Gustafson, Per E. (1998). Gender differences in risk perception: theoretical and methodological perspectives. Risk Analysis. 18: 805-811.
28. Heyndels, Bruno and John Ashworth (2003). Self-serving bias in Tax Perceptions: Federalism as a Source of Political Instability, Kyklos, 56: 47-68.
29. Jones, David R. (2003). Position-taking and position avoidance in the US senate. Journal of Politics 65: 851-863.
30. King, David N. (1984). Fiscal Tiers. The Economics of Multi-Level Government. London: George Allen & Unwin.
31. Koetzle, William. (1998). The impact of constituency diversity on the competiveness of U.S. house elections, 1962-96. Legislative Studies Quarterly. 23: 561-573.
32. Kollman, Ken., John H. Miller and Scott E. Page (1992). Adaptive parties in spatial elections. American Political Science Review. 86: 929-937.
33. Lemert, James. (1986). Picking up winners: Politician vs voter prediction of two controversial ballot measures. Public Opinion Quarterly. 50:208-221
34. Madsen, Jakob B. (1994).Tests of rationality versus an "over-optimist bias. Journal of Economic Psychology. 15: 587-599.
35. Matsusaka, John G. (1992). Economics of direct legislation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 107: 541-571.
36. Nunnenkamp, Peter and Hannes Öhler (2012). Funding, Competition and the Efficiency of NGOs: An Empirical Analysis of Non-charitable Expenditure of US NGOs Engaged in Foreign Aid. Kyklos. 65: 53-80.
37. Oates, Wallace E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
38. Pagan, Adrian and Frank Vella (1989). Diagnostic Tests for Models on Individual Data: A Survey. Journal of Applied Econometrics. 4: S29-S59.
39. Portmann, Marco, David Stadelmann and Reiner Eichenberger (2012). District magnitude and representation of the majority's preferences: Evidence from popular and parliamentary votes, Public Choice. 151: 581-610.
40. Rose, Richard and Terence Karran (1987). Taxation by Political Inertia. London: Allen & Unwin.
41. Stadelmann, David, Marco Portmann and Reiner Eichenberger (2011). The Law of Large Districts: Evidence on District Magnitude and the Quality of Political Representation. University of Fribourg Working Paper.
42. Stadelmann, David, Marco Portmann and Reiner Eichenberger (2012) Evaluating the median voter model's explanatory power" Economics Letters. 114: 312-314
43. Tetlock, Philip E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton: Princeton University Press
44. Veall, Michael R. and Klaus S. Zimmermann (1996). Pseudo-R2 Measures for Some Common Limited Dependent Variable Models. Journal of Economic Surveys. 10: 241-259.