Implicit attitude generalization occurs immediately; Explicit attitude generalization takes time: Research article

Psychological Science

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 249-254

  Ranganath, Kate A ^a   Nosek, Brian A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40249113512     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02076.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baccus, J.R., Baldwin, M.W., & Packer, D.J. (2004). Increasing implicit self‐esteem through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 15, 498–502.
2. Banaji, M.R., & Bhaskar, R. (2000). Implicit stereotypes and memory: The bounded rationality of social beliefs. In D.L. Schacter & E. Scarry (Eds.), Memory, brain, and belief (pp. 139–175). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Campbell, D.T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14–25.
4. Clark, H.H., & Clark, E.V. (1977). Psychology and language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
5. Crawford, M.T., Sherman, S.J., & Hamilton, D.L. (2002). Perceived entitativity, stereotype formation, and the interchangeability of group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1076–1094.
6. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692–731.
7. Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self‐esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.
8. Greenwald, A.G., Banaji, M.R., Rudman, L.A., Farnham, S.D., Nosek, B.A., & Mellott, D.S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self‐esteem, and self‐concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.
9. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.K.L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
10. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197–216.
11. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., & Klauer, K. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the Implicit Association Test: Comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 420–425.
12. Gregg, A.P. (2000). The hare and the tortoise: The origins and dynamics of implicit and explicit attitudes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
13. Gregg, A.P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M.A. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of automatic preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 1–20.
14. Hamilton, D.L., & Gifford, R.K. (1976). Illusory correlation in interpersonal perception: A cognitive basis of stereotypic judgments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 392–407.
15. Heider, F. (1958). Interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
16. Johnson, M.K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3–28.
17. McConnell, A.R., Sherman, S.J., & Hamilton, D.L. (1997). Target entitativity: Implications for information processing about individual and group targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 750–762.
18. Nosek, B.A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565–584.
19. Nosek, B.A. (2007). Implicit‐explicit relations. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 65–69.
20. Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166–180.
21. Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (2007). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J.A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265–292). New York: Psychology Press.
22. Olson, M.A., & Fazio, R.H. (2001). Implicit attitude formation through classical conditioning. Psychological Science, 12, 413–417.
23. Reyna, V.F., & Brainerd, C.J. (1995). Fuzzy trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1–75.
24. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139–165.
25. Rydell, R.J., McConnell, A.R., Mackie, D.M., & Strain, L.M. (2006). Of two minds: Forming and changing valence‐inconsistent implicit and explicit attitudes. Psychological Science, 17, 954–958.
26. Sloman, S.A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22.
27. Smith, E.R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual‐process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131.
28. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 220–247.