Effects of surface microtopography on the assembly of the osteoclast resorption apparatus

Journal of the Royal Society Interface

Volumn 9, Issue 72, 2012, Pages 1599-1608

  Geblinger, Dafna ^a   Zink, Christian ^b   Spencer, Nicholas D ^b   Addadi, Lia ^a   Geiger, Benjamin ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Biocompatible materials; Bone remodelling; Cytoskeleton; Osteoclast; Roughness

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOMATERIALS; DEGRADATION; DESIGN; PROTEINS; SUBSTRATES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TITANIUM;

ACTIN CYTOSKELETON; BONE REMODELLING; BONE REPLACEMENT; CYTOSKELETONS; INVERSE CORRELATION; LENGTH SCALE; OSTEOCLAST; PATHOLOGICAL CONDITIONS; PODOSOMES; PROTEOLYTIC ENZYME; SUBSTRATE ROUGHNESS; SURFACE MICROTOPOGRAPHY;

BONE;

TITANIUM;

ACTIN FILAMENT; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; CELL ADHESION; MICROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR STABILITY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; OSTEOCLAST; OSTEOLYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY;

LACUNA;

EID: 84863558900     PISSN: 17425689     EISSN: 17425662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0659     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Roodman, G. D. 1996 Advances in bone biology: the osteoclast. Endocr. Rev. 17, 308-332. (Pubitemid 26277978)
2. Engh, C. A., O'Connor, D., Jasty, M., McGovern, T. F., Bobyn, J. D. & Harris, W. H. 1992 Quantification of implant micromotion, strain shielding, and bone-resorption with porous-coated anatomic medullary locking femoral prostheses. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 285, 13-29.
3. Gilbert, J. L., Bloomfeld, R. S., Lautenschlager, E. P. & Wixson, R. L. 1992 A computer-based biomechanical analysis of the 3-dimensional motion of cementless hip prostheses. J. Biomech. 25, 329-340. (doi:10.1016/0021-9290(92) 90252-V)
4. Vaananen, H. K. & Horton, M. 1995 The osteoclast clear zone is a specialized cell-extracellular matrix adhesion structure. J. Cell Sci. 108, 2729-2732.
5. Luxenburg, C., Geblinger, D., Klein, E., Anderson, K., Hanein, D., Geiger, B. & Addadi, L. 2007 The architecture of the adhesive apparatus of cultured osteoclasts: from podosome formation to sealing zone assembly. PLoS ONE 2, e179. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000179)
6. Chellaiah, M., Kizer, N., Silva, M., Alvarez, U., Kwiatkowski, D. & Hruska, K. A. 2000 Gelsolin deficiency blocks podosome assembly and produces increased bone mass and strength. J. Cell Biol. 148, 665-678. (doi:10.1083/jcb.148.4.665)
7. Calle, Y., Jones, G. E., Jagger, C., Fuller, K., Blundell, M. P., Chow, J., Chambers, T. & Thrasher, A. J. 2004 WASp deficiency in mice results in failure to form osteoclast sealing zones and defects in bone resorption. Blood 103, 3552-3561. (doi:10.1182/blood-2003-04-1259)
8. Zambonin Zallone, A., Teti, A., Gaboli, M. & Marchisio, P. C. 1989 Beta 3 subunit of vitronectin receptor is present in osteoclast adhesion structures and not in other monocyte-macrophage derived cells. Connect. Tissue Res. 20, 143-149. (doi:10.3109/03008208909023882)
9. Zambonin-Zallone, A., Teti, A., Grano, M., Rubinacci, A., Abbadini, M., Gaboli, M. & Marchisio, P. C. 1989 Immunocytochemical distribution of extracellular matrix receptors in human osteoclasts: a beta 3 integrin is colocalized with vinculin and talin in the podosomes of osteoclastoma giant cells. Exp. Cell Res. 182, 645-652. (doi:10.1016/0014-4827(89)90266-8)
10. Pfaff, M. & Jurdic, P. 2001 Podosomes in osteoclast-like cells: structural analysis and cooperative roles of paxillin, proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2 (Pyk2) and integrin alpha- Vbeta3. J. Cell Sci. 114, 2775-2786. (Pubitemid 32785456)
11. Luxenburg, C., Addadi, L. & Geiger, B. 2006 The molecular dynamics of osteoclast adhesions. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 85, 203-211. (doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2005. 11.002)
12. Lakkakorpi, P. T. & Vaananen, H. K. 1996 Cytoskeletal changes in osteoclasts during the resorption cycle. Microsc. Res. Tech. 33, 171-181. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19960201)33:2〈171::AID-JEMT7〉3.0.CO;2-W)
13. Destaing, O., Saltel, F., Geminard, J. C., Jurdic, P. & Bard, F. 2003 Podosomes display actin turnover and dynamic self-organization in osteoclasts expressing actingreen fluorescent protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 407-416. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E02-07-0389)
14. Saltel, F., Destaing, O., Bard, F., Eichert, D. & Jurdic, P. 2004 Apatite-mediated actin dynamics in resorbing osteoclasts. Mol. Biol. Cell 15, 5231-5241. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E04-06-0522)
15. Redey, S. A., Razzouk, S., Rey, C., Bernache-Assollant, D., Leroy, G., Nardin, M. & Cournot, G. 1999 Osteoclast adhesion and activity on synthetic hydroxyapatite, carbonated hydroxyapatite, and natural calcium carbonate: relationship to surface energies. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 45, 140-147. (doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2〈140::AID-JBM9〉3.0.CO;2-I)
16. Monchau, F., Lefevre, A., Descamps, M., Belquin-myrdycz, A., Laffargue, P. & Hildebrand, H. F. 2002 In vitro studies of human and rat osteoclast activity on hydroxyapatite, beta-tricalcium phosphate, calcium carbonate. Biomol. Eng. 19, 143-152. (doi:10.1016/S1389-0344(02)00023-0)
17. Nakamura, I., Takahashi, N., Sasaki, T., Jimi, E., Kurokawa, T. & Suda, T. 1996 Chemical and physical properties of the extracellular matrix are required for the actin ring formation in osteoclasts. J. Bone Miner. Res. 11, 1873-1879. (doi:10.1002/jbmr.5650111207)
18. Geblinger, D., Geiger, B. & Addadi, L. 2009 Surface-induced regulation of podosome organization and dynamics in cultured osteoclasts. Chembiochem 10, 158-165. (doi:10.1002/cbic.200800549)
19. Geblinger, D., Addadi, L. & Geiger, B. 2010 Nanotopography sensing by osteoclasts. J. Cell Sci. 123, 1503-1510. (doi:10.1242/jcs.060954)
20. Baharloo, B., Textor, M. & Brunette, D. M. 2005 Substratum roughness alters the growth, area, and focal adhesions of epithelial cells, and their proximity to titanium surfaces. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 74, 12-22. (Pubitemid 41099246)
21. Ball, M., Grant, D. M., Lo, W. J. & Scotchford, C. A. 2008 The effect of different surface morphology and roughness on osteoblast-like cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 86, 637-647.
22. Curtis, A. & Wilkinson, C. 1997 Topographical control of cells. Biomaterials 18, 1573-1583. (doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00144-0)
23. Deligianni, D. D., Katsala, N. D., Koutsoukos, P. G. & Missirlis, Y. F. 2001 Effect of surface roughness of hydroxyapatite on human bone marrow cell adhesion, proliferation, differentiation and detachment strength. Biomaterials 22, 87-96. (doi:10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00174-5)
24. Huang, H. H., Ho, C. T., Lee, T. H., Lee, T. L., Liao, K. K. & Chen, F. L. 2004 Effect of surface roughness of ground titanium on initial cell adhesion. Biomol. Eng. 21, 93-97. (doi:10.1016/j.bioeng.2004.05.001)
25. Kunzler, T. P., Drobek, T., Schuler, M. & Spencer, N. D. 2007 Systematic study of osteoblast and fibroblast response to roughness by means of surface-morphology gradients. Biomaterials 28, 2175-2182. (doi:10.1016/j. biomaterials.2007.01.019)
26. Kunzler, T. P., Huwiler, C., Drobek, T., Voros, J. & Spencer, N. D. 2007 Systematic study of osteoblast response to nanotopography by means of nanoparticle-density gradients. Biomaterials 28, 5000-5006. (doi:10.1016/j. biomaterials.2007.08.009)
27. Makihira, S., Mine, Y., Kosaka, E. & Nikawa, H. 2007 Titanium surface roughness accelerates RANKL-dependent differentiation in the osteoclast precursor cell line, RAW264.7. Dent. Mater. J. 26, 739-745. (doi:10.4012/dmj.26. 739)
28. Marchisio, M., Di Carmine, M., Pagone, R., Piattelli, A. & Miscia, S. 2005 Implant surface roughness influences osteoclast proliferation and differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater. 75, 251-256. (Pubitemid 41609544)
29. Price, R. L., Ellison, K., Haberstroh, K. M. & Webster, T. J. 2004 Nanometer surface roughness increases select osteoblast adhesion on carbon nanofiber compacts. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 70, 129-138. (doi:10.1002/jbm.a. 30073)
30. Luxenburg, C., Parsons, J. T., Addadi, L. & Geiger, B. 2006 Involvement of the Src-cortactin pathway in podosome formation and turnover during polarization of cultured osteoclasts. J. Cell Sci. 119, 4878-4888. (doi:10.1242/jcs.03271)
31. Wieland, M., Hanggi, P., Hotz, W., Textor, M., Keller, B. A. & Spencer, N. D. 2000 Wavelength-dependent measurement and evaluation of surface topographies: application of a new concept of window roughness and surface transfer function. Wear 237, 231-252. (doi:10.1016/S0043-1648(99)00347-6)
32. Jurdic, P., Saltel, F., Chabadel, A. & Destaing, O. 2006 Podosome and sealing zone: specificity of the osteoclast model. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 85, 195-202. (doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.09.008)
33. Badowski, C., Pawlak, G., Grichine, A., Chabadel, A., Oddou, C., Jurdic, P., Pfaff, M., Albiges-Rizo, C. & Block, M. R. 2008 Paxillin phosphorylation controls invadopodia/podosomes spatiotemporal organization. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 633-645. (doi:10.1091/mbc.E06-01-0088)
34. Geiger, B. & Bershadsky, A. 2001 Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal contacts. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 13, 584-592. (doi:10.1016/S0955- 0674(00)00255-6)
35. Bershadsky, A., Kozlov, M. & Geiger, B. 2006 Adhesion-mediated mechanosensitivity: a time to experiment, and a time to theorize. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 18, 472-481. (doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2006.08.012)
36. Geiger, B., Spatz, J. P. & Bershadsky, A. D. 2009 Environmental sensing through focal adhesions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 10, 21-33. (doi:10.1038/nrm2593)
37. Bershadsky, A. D. et al. 2006 Assembly and mechanosensory function of focal adhesions: experiments and models. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 85, 165-173. (doi:10.1016/j.ejcb.2005.11.001)
38. Riveline, D., Zamir, E., Balaban, N. Q., Schwarz, U. S., Ishizaki, T., Narumiya, S., Kam, Z., Geiger, B. & Bershadsky, A. D. 2001 Focal contacts as mechanosensors: externally applied local mechanical force induces growth of focal contacts by an mDia1-dependent and ROCK-independent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 153, 1175-1186. (doi:10.1083/jcb.153.6.1175)
39. Balaban, N. Q. et al. 2001 Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 466-472. (doi:10.1038/35074532)
40. Bershadsky, A. D., Balaban, N. Q. & Geiger, B. 2003 Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 19, 677-695. (doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.19.111301.153011)