Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model to Study the Effects of Group Composition

Small Group Research

Volumn 43, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 468-496

  Kenny, David A ^a   Garcia, Randi L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

climate; dyads; multilevel analysis; satisfaction

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863517151     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: 15528278     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1046496412441626     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Antonio A. L.,Chang M. J.,Hakuta K.,Kenny D. A.,Levin S.Effects of racial diversity on complex thinking in college students.Psychological Science. 2004;15:507-510.
2. Boivin M.,Dodge K. A.,Coie J. D.Individual-group behavioral similarity and peer status in experimental play groups of boys: The social misfit revisited.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1995;69:269-279.
3. Brown R.Social psychology. New York, NY: Free Press; 1965:.
4. Culhane S. E.,Hosch H. M.,Weaver W. G.Crime victims serving as jurors: Is there bias present?.Law and Human Behavior. 2004;28:649-659.
5. Davis J. A.The campus as a frog pond: An application of the theory of relative deprivation to career decisions of college men.American Journal of Sociology. 1966;72:17-31.
6. Eagly A. H.,Carli L. L.Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: A meta-analysis of social influence studies.Psychological Bulletin. 1981;90:1-20.
7. Elfenbein H. A.,O'Reilly C. A.Fitting in: The effects of relational demography and person-culture fit on group process and performance.Group Organizational Management. 2007;32:109.
8. Gonzalez R.,Griffin D. W.Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Interpersonal processes. Fletcher G. J. O.Clark M. S., ed. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2001:505-534.
9. Harrison D. A.,Klein K. J.What's the difference: Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations.Academy of Management. 2007;32:1199-1228.
10. Harrison D. A.,Price K. H.,Bell M. P.Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion.Academy of Management Journal. 1998;41:96-107.
11. Haythorn W. W.The composition of groups: A review of the literature.Acta Psychologica. 1968;28:97-128.
12. Hewstone M.,Crisp R. J.,Contarello A.,Voci A.,Conway L.,Marletta G.,Willis H.Tokens in the tower: Perceptual processes and interaction dynamics in academic settings with "skewed," "tilted" and "balanced" sex ratios.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2006;9:509-532.
13. Jackson S.,Brett J.,Sessa V.,Cooper D.,Julin J.,Peyronnin K.Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover.Journal of Applied Psychology. 1991;76:675-689.
14. Kanter R. M.Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women.American Journal of Sociology. 1977;82:965-990.
15. Kelley H. H.,Holmes J. G.,Kerr N. L.,Reis H. T.,Rusbult C. E.,Van Lange P. A.An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
16. Kenny D. A.,Cook W.Partner effects in relationship research: Conceptual issues, analytic difficulties, and illustrations.Personal Relationships. 1999;6:433-448.
17. Kenny D. A.,Kashy D. A.,Cook W. L.Analysis of dyadic data. New York, NY: Guilford; 2006:.
18. Kenny D. A.,Livi S.Multi-level issues in organizational behavior and leadership. Yammarino F. J.Dansereau F., ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald; 2009:147-191.
19. Kenny D. A.,Mannetti L.,Pierro A.,Livi S.,Kashy D. A.The statistical analysis of data from small groups.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;83:126-137.
20. Lau D.,Murnighan J.Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines.Academy of Management Journal. 2005;48:645-659.
21. Leach C.,van Zomeren M.,Zebel S.,Vliek M. W.,Pennekamp S. F.,Doosje B.,. Spears R.Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;95:144-165.
22. Levine J.,Choi H.,Moreland R.Group creativity: Innovation through collaboration. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2003:202-224.
23. Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (1998). Small groups. In D. T. Gilbert, S. E. Fiske, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. II, pp. 415-469). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
24. Moreland R. L.Are dyads really groups?.Small Group Research. 2010;41:251-267.
25. Moreland R. L.Group processes. Levine J., ed. New York, NY: Psychology Press; 2012:.
26. Moreland R. L.,Levine J. M.Advances in group processes. Lawler E. J.Markovsky B.Ridgeway C.Walker H. A., ed. Greenwich, CT: JAI; 1992:237-280.
27. Raudenbush S. W.,Bryk A. S.Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2002:.
28. Saenz D.Token status and problem-solving deficits: Detrimental effects of distinctiveness and performance monitoring.Social Cognition. 1994;12:61-74.
29. Sekaquaptewa D.,Thompson M.The differential effects of solo status on members of high- and low-status groups.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2002;28:694-707.
30. Shaffer J. P.Reorganization of variables in analysis of variance and multidimensional contingency tables.Psychological Bulletin. 1977;84:220-228.
31. Smith E. R.,Henry S.An in-group becomes part of the self: Response time evidence.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1996;22:635-642.
32. Sommers S. R.On racial diversity and group decision making: Identifying multiple effects of racial composition on jury deliberations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2006;90:597-612.
33. Tsui A. S.,Egan T. D.,O'Reilly C. A.Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment.Administrative Science Quarterly. 1992;37:549-579.
34. Journal of Applied Psychology. Tziner A.Eden D., ed. 1985:85-93.
35. Wright J. C.,Giammarino M.,Parad H. W.Social status in small groups: Individual-group similarity and the social "misfit.".Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1986;50:523-536.