Tokens in the tower: Perceptual processes and interaction dynamics in academic settings with 'Skewed', 'Tilted' and 'Balanced' sex ratios

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 509-532

  Hewstone, Miles ^a   Crisp, Richard J ^b   Contarello, Alberta ^c   Voci, Alberto ^c   Conway, Laura ^d   Marletta, Giorgia ^c   Willis, Hazel ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^d CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GLOUCESTERSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Gender; Group size; In group homogeneity; Out group homogeneity; Perceived variability; Sex ratios; Tokenism

Indexed keywords

EID: 33749635054     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430206067558     Document Type: Article

References (114)

1. Alexander, V. D., & Thoits, P. A. (1985). Token achievement: An examination of proportional representation and performance outcomes. Social Forces, 64, 332-340.
2. Allmendinger, J., & Hackman, J. R. (1995). The more the better? A four-nation study of the inclusion of women in symphony orchestras. Social Forces, 74, 423-460.
3. Bartsch, R. A., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Majority-minority status and perceived in-group variability revisited. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 471-468.
4. Beaton, A. M., & Tougas, F. (1997). The representation of women in management: The more, the merrier? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 773-782.
5. Blalock, H. M. (1967). Toward a theory of minority group relations. New York: Wiley.
6. Bourhis, R. Y. (1994). Power, gender, and intergroup discrimination: Some minimal group experiments. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 171-208). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Branscombe, N. R. (1998). Thinking about one's gender group's privileges or disadvantages: Consequences for well-being in women and men. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 167-184.
8. Brauer, M., & Judd, C. M. (2000). Defining variables in relationship to other variables: When interactions suddenly turn out to be main effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 410-423.
9. Brewer, M. B. (1993). Social identity, distinctiveness, and in-group homogeneity. Social Cognition, 11, 150-164.
10. Brown, R., & Smith, A. (1989). Perceptions of and by minority groups: The case of women in academia. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 61-75.
11. Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25.
12. Chen, S., Lee-Chai, A. Y., & Bargh, J. (2001). Relationship orientation as a moderator of the effects of social power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 173-187.
13. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 310-357.
14. Corneille, O., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Rogier, A., & Buidin, G. (2001). Threat and the group attribution error: When threat elicits judgments of extremity and homogeneity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 437-446.
15. Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608-630.
16. Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997). Models of the self: Self-construals and gender. Psychological Bulletin, 122, 5-37.
17. Devos, T., Comby, L., & Deschamps, J.-C. (1996). Asymmetries in judgements of in-group and out-group variability. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 95-144). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18. Dipboye, R. L., & Colella, A. (Eds.) (2005). Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
19. Doosje, B., Ellemers, N., & Spears, R. (1995). Perceived intragroup variability as a function of group status and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 410-436.
20. Dworkin, A. G., Chafetz, J. S., & Dworkin, R. J. (1986). The effects of tokenism on work alienation among urban public school teachers. Work and Occupations, 13, 399-420.
21. Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior. A social-role interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 3-22.
23. Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1994). Are people prejudiced against women? Some answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgements of competence. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 1-36). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
24. Ellemers, N., & van Rijswijk, W. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group-level and individual-level management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60, 52-65.
25. Fairhurst, G. T., & Snavely, B. K. (1983a). Majority and token minority group relationships: Power acquisition and communication. Academy of Management Review, 8, 292-300.
26. Fairhurst, G. T., & Snavely, B. K. (1983b). A test of the social isolation of male tokens. Academy of Management Review, 26, 353-361.
27. Fajak, A., & Haslam, S. A. (1998). Gender solidarity in hierarchical organizations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 73-94.
28. Farley, J. (1982). Majority-minority relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
29. Fiske, S. T. (1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48, 621-628.
30. Floge, L., & Merrill, D. (1986). Tokenism reconsidered: Male nurses and female physicians in a hospital setting. Social Forces, 64, 925-947.
31. Foster, M. D., & Matheson, K. (1998). Perceiving and feeling discrimination: Motivation or inhibition for collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1, 165-174.
32. Fottler, M. P. (1976). Attitudes of female nurses toward the male nurses: A study of occupational segregation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 17, 98-110.
33. Frable, D. E. S. (1993). Dimensions of marginality: Distinctions among those who are different. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 370-380.
34. Frable, D. E. S., Blackstone, T., & Scherbaum, C. (1990). Marginal and mindful: Deviants in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 140-149.
35. Geis, F. L. (1993). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A social-psychological view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 9-54). New York: Guilford.
36. Glick, P. (1991). Trait-based and sex-based discrimination in occupational prestige, occupational salary, and hiring. Sex Roles, 25, 351-378.
37. Grimm, J., & Stern, R. (1974). Sex roles and internal labor market structures: The 'female' semi-professions. Social Problems, 21, 690-705.
38. Gross, S. R., & Miller, N. (1997). The 'Golden Section' and bias in perceptions of social consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 241-271.
39. Guinote, A. (2004). Group size, outcome dependency, and power: Effects on perceived and actual group variability. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity, and essentialism (pp. 221-236). New York: Psychology Press.
40. Guinote, A., Judd, C. M., & Brauer, M. (2002). Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 708-721.
41. Hamilton, D. L., Sherman, S. J., & Lickel, B. (1998). Perceiving social groups: The importance of the Entitativity Continuum. In C. Sedikides, J. Schopler, & C. A. Insko (Eds.), Intergroup cognition and intergroup behavior (pp. 47-74). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Heikes, E. J. (1991). When men are the minority: The case of men in nursing. Sociological Quarterly, 32, 389-401.
43. Heilman, M. E. (1980). The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 26, 386-395.
44. Hogg, M., & Turner, J. (1987). Intergroup behavior, self-stereotyping, and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340.
45. Izraeli, D. (1983). Sex effects or structural effects? An empirical test of Kanter's theory of proportions. Social Forces, 62, 153-165.
46. Jackson, P. B., Thoits, P. A., & Taylor, H. F. (1995). Composition of the workplace and psychological well-being: The effects of tokenism on America's Black elite. Social Forces, 74, 543-557.
47. Jacobs, J. A., & Powell, B. (1985). Occupational prestige: A sex-neutral concept? Sex Roles, 12, 1061-1071.
48. Johnson, R. A., & Schulman, G. I. (1989). Gender-role composition and role entrapment in decision-making groups. Gender & Society, 3, 355-372.
49. Jones, E. E., Wood, G. C., & Quattrone, G. A. (1981). Perceived variability of personal characteristics in in-groups and out-groups: The role of knowledge and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7, 523-528.
50. Jurik, N. (1985). An officer and a lady: Organizational barriers to women working as correctional officers in men's prisons. Social Problems, 32, 375-388.
51. Kadushin, A. (1976). Men in a women's profession. Social Work, 21, 440-447.
52. Kanter, R. M. (1977a). Some effects of proportions on group life: Skewed sex ratios and responses to token women. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 965-990.
53. Kanter, R. M. (1977b). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
54. Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., & Anderson, C. (2003). Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychological Review, 110, 265-284.
55. Laws, J. L. (1975). The psychology of tokenism: An analysis. Sex Roles, 1, 51-67.
56. Lie, S. S., & O'Leary, V. E. (1990). In the same boat? Academic women around the world. In S. S. Lie & V. E. O'Leary (Eds.), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world (pp. 17-29). New York: Nichols G/P Publishing.
57. Linville, P. W. (1998). The heterogeneity of homogeneity. In J. Cooper & J. Darley (Eds.), Attribution processes and social interaction: The legacy of Edward E. Jones (pp. 423-487). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
58. Lord, C. G., & Saenz, D. S. (1985). Memory deficits and memory surfeits: Differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 918-926.
59. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). They all look alike, but so do we... sometimes: Perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity as a function of sex and context. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 111-124.
60. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1998). Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 9, pp. 31-75). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
61. Lorenzi-Cioldi, F., Eagly, A. H., & Stewart, T. L. (1995). Homogeneity of gender groups in memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 193-217.
62. MacCorquordale, P., & Jensen, G. (1993). Women in the law: Partners or tokens? Gender & Society, 7, 582-593.
63. Major, B., & Crocker, J. (1993). Social stigma: The consequences of attributional ambiguity. In D. M. Mackie & D. L. Hamilton (Eds.), Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp. 345-370). New York: Academic Press.
64. Martin, P. Y. (1985). Group sex composition in work organizations: A structural-normative model. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 4, 311-349.
65. Martin, S. E. (1980). Breaking and entering: Policewomen on patrol. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
66. Mellor, S. (1996). Gender composition and gender representation in local unions: Relationships between women's participation in local office and women's participation in local activities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 706-720.
67. Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
68. Mullen, B., Brown, R., & Smith, C. (1992). In-group bias as a function of salience, relevance, and status: An integration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 103-122.
69. Mullen, B., & Hu, L. (1989). Perceptions of in-group and out-group variability: A meta-analytic integration. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 10, 233-252.
70. Niemann, Y. F., & Dovidio, J. F. (1998). Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 55-71.
71. Nieva, V. F., & Gutek, B. A. (1981). Women and work: A psychological perspective. New York: Praeger.
72. Ostrom, T. M., & Sedikides, C. (1992). Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 536-552.
73. Ott, E. M. (1989). Effects of the male-female ratio at work: Policewomen and male nurses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 13, 41-58.
74. Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 549-565.
75. Park, B., & Judd, C. M. (1990). Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 173-191.
76. Park, B., & Rothbart, M. (1982). Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1051-1068.
77. Pettigrew, T. F., & Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41-78.
78. Pfeffer, J., & Davis-Blake, A. (1987). The effect of the proportion of women on salaries: The case of college administrators. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 1-24.
79. Reskin, B. F., & Roos, P. A. (1990). Job cues, gender cues: Explaining women's inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
80. Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1992). Are gender differences status differences? In C. L. Ridgeway (Ed.), Gender, interaction, and inequality (pp. 157-180). New York: Springer-Verlag.
81. Ridgeway, C. L., & Smith-Lovin, L. (1999). The gender system and interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 181-216.
82. Riordan, C. M., Schaffer, B. S., & Stewart, M. M. (2005). Relational demography within groups: Through the lens of discrimination. In R. L. Dipboye & A. Colella (Eds.), Discrimination at work: The psychological and organizational bases (pp. 37-62). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
83. Rothgerber, H. (1997). External intergroup threat as an antecedent to perceptions of in-group and out-group homogeneity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1206-1211.
84. Rubin, J. M., Hewstone, M., Crisp, R. J., Voci, A., & Richards, Z. (2004). Gender out-group homogeneity: The roles of differential familiarity, gender differences and group size. In V. Yzerbyt, C. M. Judd, & O. Corneille (Eds.), The psychology of group perception: Perceived variability, entitativity and essentialism (pp. 203-220). New York: Psychology Press.
85. Rustad, M. (1982). Women in khaki: The American enlisted woman. New York: Praeger.
86. Ryan, C. S., & Bogart, L. M. (1997). Development of new group members' in-group and out-group stereotypes: Changes in perceived group variability and ethnocentrism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 719-732.
87. Sackett, P. R., DuBois, C. L. Z., & Noe, A. W. (1991). Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and white-black differences in performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 263-267.
88. Seifert, K. (1973). Some problems of men in child care center work. Child Welfare, 52, 167-171.
89. Shaffer, D. R., Gresham, A., Clary, E. G., & Theilman, T. J. (1986). Sex ratios as a basis for occupational evaluations: A contemporary view. Social Behavior and Personality, 14, 77-83.
90. Simon, B. (1992). The perception of in-group and out-group homogeneity: Reintroducing the intergroup context. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 1-30). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
91. Simon, B., & Brown, R. (1987). Perceived intragroup homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 703-711.
92. Simon, B., & Hamilton, D. L. (1994). Self-stereotyping and social context: The effects of relative in-group size and in-group status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 699-711.
93. Simon, B., & Mummendey, A. (1990). Perceptions of relative group size and group homogeneity: We are the majority and they are all the same. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 351-356.
94. Simon, B., & Pettigrew, T. F. (1990). Social identity and perceived group homogeneity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 269-286.
95. South, S. J., Bonjean, C. M., Markham, W. T., & Corder, J. (1982). Social structure and intergroup interaction: Men and women of the federal bureaucracy. American Sociological Review, 47, 587-599.
96. Spangler, E., Gordon, M. A., & Pipkin, R. M. (1978). Token women: An empirical test of Kanter's hypothesis. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 160-170.
97. Steene, J., Guinipero, L., & Newgren, J. (1985). A profile of management faculty: Teaching, research, and career satisfaction. Journal of Business Education, 60, 347-352.
98. Stewart, T. L., Vassar, P. M., Sanchez, D. T., & David, S. E. (2000). Attitude towards women's societal roles moderates the effect of gender cues on target individuation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 143-157.
99. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
100. Taylor, S. E. (1981). A categorization approach to stereotyping. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.), Cognitive processes in stereotyping and intergroup behavior (pp. 83-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
101. Taylor, S. E., Fiske, S. T., Etcoff, N. L., & Ruderman, A. J. (1978). Categorical bases of person memory and stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 778-793.
102. Toren, N. (1990). Would more women make a difference? Academic women in Israel. In S. S. Lie & V. E. O'Leary (Eds.), Storming the tower: Women in the academic world (pp. 74-85). New York: Nichols G/P Publishing.
103. Toren, N., & Kraus, V. (1987). The effects of minority size on women's position in academia. Social Forces, 65, 1090-1100.
104. Voci, A. (2000). Perceived group variability and the salience of personal and social identity. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European Review of Social Psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 177-222). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
105. Warr, P. B. (1990). The measurement of well-being and other aspects of mental health. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 193-210.
106. Yoder, J. D. (1991). Rethinking tokenism: Looking beyond numbers. Gender & Society, 5, 178-192.
107. Yoder, J. D. (1994). Looking beyond numbers: The effects of gender status, job prestige, and occupational gender-typing on tokenism processes. Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 150-159.
108. Yoder, J. D., Adams, J., Grove, S., & Priest, R. F. (1985). To teach is to learn: Overcoming tokenism with mentors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 119-131.
109. Yoder, J. D., Adams, J., & Prince, H. (1983). The price of a token. Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 11, 325-337.
110. Yoder, J. D., Crumpton, P., & Zipp, J. (1989). The power of numbers in influencing hiring decisions. Gender & Society, 3, 269-276.
111. Yoder, J. D., & Sinnett, L. (1985). Is it all in the numbers? A case study of tokenism. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 412-418.
112. Young, C. J., Mackenzie, D. I., & Sherif, C. W. (1980). In search of token women in academia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 4, 508-525.
113. Young, H., van Knippenberg, A., Ellemers, N., & de Vries, N. (1999). The asymmetrical perception of men and women. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 2, 259-278.
114. Young, J. L., & James, E. H. (2001). Token majority: The work attitudes of male flight attendants. Sex Roles, 45, 299-319.