fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects

Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 506-515

  Gamer, Matthias ^a   Klimecki, Olga ^b   Bauermann, Thomas ^c   Stoeter, Peter ^c   Vossel, Gerhard ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER HAMBURG EPPENDORF   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c JOHANNES GUTENBERG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Concealed information; Deception; Guilty knowledge test; Response conflict; Skin conductance

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECEPTION; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; FORENSIC MEDICINE; GAME; GUILT; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECEPTION; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; GAMES, EXPERIMENTAL; GUILT; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; LIE DETECTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; OXYGEN; REACTION TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84863514246     PISSN: 17495016     EISSN: 17495024     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsp005     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abe, N., Suzuki, M., Tsukiura, T., et al. (2006). Dissociable roles of prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortices in deception. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 192-99.
2. Allen, J.J., Iacono, W.G., Danielson, K.D. (1992). The identification of concealed memories using the event-related potential and implicit behavioral measures: a methodology for prediction in the face of individual differences. Psychophysiology, 29, 504-22.
3. Aron, A.R., Robbins, T.W., Poldrack, R.A. (2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 170-7.
4. Barry, R.J. (1984). Preliminary processes in O-R elicitation. Acta Psychologica, 55, 109-42.
5. Ben-Shakhar, G., Furedy, J.J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective. New York: Springer.
6. Ben-Shakhar, G., Elaad, E. (2002). The Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT) as an application of psychophysiology: Future prospects and obstacles. In: Kleiner, M., editor. Handbook of polygraph testing. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 87-102.
7. Ben-Shakhar, G., Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131-51.
8. Bles, M., Haynes, J. (2008). Detecting concealed information using brain-imaging technology. Neurocase, 14, 82-92.
9. Bradley, M.T., MacLaren, V.V., Carle, S.B. (1996). Deception and nondeception in guilty knowledge and guilty action polygraph tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 153-60.
10. Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Gray, J.R., Molfese, D.L., Snyder, A. (2001). Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. Cerebral Cortex, 11, 825-36.
11. Brett, M., Anton, J., Valabregue, R., Poline, J. (2002) Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [Abstract]. Presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2-6, 2002, Sendai, Japan. Available on CD-ROM in Neuroimage, 16.
12. Craik, F.I.M., Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: a framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-84.
13. D'Esposito, M., Postle, B.R., Rypma, B. (2000). Prefrontal cortical contributions to working memory: evidence from event-related fMRI studies. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 3-11.
14. Davatzikos, C., Ruparel, K., Fan, Y., et al. (2005). Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection. Neuroimage, 28, 663-8.
15. Downar, J., Crawley, A.P., Mikulis, D.J., Davis, K.D. (2000). A multimodal cortical network for the detection of changes in the sensory environment. Nature Neuroscience, 3, 277-83.
16. Downar, J., Crawley, A.P., Mikulis, D.J., Davis, K.D. (2001). The effect of task relevance on the cortical response to changes in visual and auditory stimuli: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroimage, 14, 1256-67.
17. Downar, J., Crawley, A.P., Mikulis, D.J., Davis, K.D. (2002). A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 615-20.
18. Edelberg, R. (1967). Electrical properties of the skin. In: Brown, C.C., editor. Methods in Psychophysiology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins, pp. 1-53.
19. Elaad, E., Ben-Shakhar, G. (1989). Effects of motivation and verbal-response type on psychophysiological detection of information. Psychophysiology, 26, 442-51.
20. Farwell, L.A., Donchin, E. (1991). The truth will out: interrogative polygraphy (lie detection) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531-47.
21. Farwell, L.A., Smith, S.S. (2001). Using brain MERMER testing to detect knowledge despite efforts to conceal. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 46, 135-43.
22. Furedy, J.J. (1986). Lie detection as psychophysiological differentiation: Some fine lines. In: Coles, M., Donchin, E., Porges, S., editors. Psychophysiology: Systems, Processes, and Applications - A handbook. New York: Guilford, pp. 683-700.
23. Furedy, J.J., Davis, C., Gurevich, M. (1988). Differentiation of deception as a psychological process: a psychophysiological approach. Psychophysiology, 25, 683-8.
24. Furedy, J.J., Gigliotti, F., Ben-Shakhar, G. (1994). Electrodermal differentiation of deception: the effect of choice versus no choice of deceptive items. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 18, 13-22.
25. Gamer, M., Rill, H., Vossel, G., Gödert, H.W. (2006). Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 76-87.
26. Gamer, M., Bauermann, T., Stoeter, P., Vossel, G. (2007). Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1287-301.
27. Genovese, C.R., Lazar, N.A., Nichols, T. (2002). Thresholding of statistical maps in functional neuroimaging using the false discovery rate. Neuroimage, 15, 870-8.
28. Gödert, H.W., Rill, H.G., Vossel, G. (2001). Psychophysiological differentiation of deception: the effects of electrodermal lability and mode of responding on skin conductance and heart rate. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 40, 61-75.
29. Greely, H.T., Illes, J. (2007). Neuroscience-based lie detection: the urgent need for regulation. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 33, 377-431.
30. Hakun, J.G., Seelig, D., Ruparel, K., et al. (2008). fMRI investigation of the cognitive structure of the Concealed Information Test. Neurocase, 14, 59-67.
31. Herron, J.E., Henson, R.N.A., Rugg, M.D. (2004). Probability effects on the neural correlates of retrieval success: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 21, 302-10.
32. Horneman, C.J., O'Gorman, J.G. (1985). Detectability in the card test as a function of the subject's verbal response. Psychophysiology, 22, 330-3.
33. Iidaka, T., Matsumoto, A., Nogawa, J., Yamamoto, Y., Sadato, N. (2006). Frontoparietal network involved in successful retrieval from episodic memory. Spatial and temporal analyses using fMRI and ERP. Cerebral Cortex, 16, 1349-60.
34. Janisse, M.P., Bradley, M.T. (1980). Deception, information and the pupillary response. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50, 748-50.
35. Kiehl, K.A., Laurens, K.R., Duty, T.L., Forster, B.B., Liddle, P.F. (2001). Neural sources involved in auditory target detection and novelty processing: an event-related fMRI study. Psychophysiology, 38, 133-42.
36. Konishi, S., Wheeler, M.E., Donaldson, D.I., Buckner, R.L. (2000). Neural correlates of episodic retrieval success. Neuroimage, 12, 276-86.
37. Kozel, F.A., Revell, L.J., Lorberbaum, J.P., et al. (2004a). A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 16, 295-305.
38. Kozel, F.A., Padgett, T.M., George, M.S. (2004b). A replication study of the neural correlates of deception. Behavioral Neuroscience, 118, 852-6.
39. Kozel, F.A., Johnson, K.A., Mu, Q., Grenesko, E.L., Laken, S.J., George, M.S. (2005). Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Biological Psychiatry, 58, 605-13.
40. Langleben, D.D., Schroeder, L., Maldjian, J.A., et al. (2002). Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage, 15, 727-32.
41. Langleben, D.D., Loughead, J.W., Bilker, W.B., et al. (2005). Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 262-72.
42. Lee, T.M.C., Liu, H., Tan, L., et al. (2002). Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Human Brain Mapping, 15, 157-64.
43. Lee, T.M.C., Liu, H., Chan, C.C.H., Ng, Y., Fox, P.T., Gao, J. (2005). Neural correlates of feigned memory impairment. Neuroimage, 28, 305-13.
44. Linden, D.E., Prvulovic, D., Formisano, E., et al. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of target detection: an fMRI study of visual and auditory oddball tasks. Cerebral Cortex, 9, 815-23.
45. Lykken, D.T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43, 385-8.
46. Lykken, D.T. (1998). A Tremor in the Blood: Uses and Abuses of the Lie Detector, 2nd edn. New York: Plenum Press.
47. Nakayama, M. (2002). Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In: Kleiner, M., editor. Handbook of Polygraph Testing. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 49-86.
48. National Research Council (2003). The polygraph and lie detection. Committee to review the scientific evidence on the polygraph. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington: The National Academies Press.
49. Nichols, T., Brett, M., Andersson, J., Wager, T., Poline, J. (2005). Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage, 25, 653-60.
50. Nuñez, J.M., Casey, B.J., Egner, T., Hare, T., Hirsch, J. (2005). Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control. Neuroimage, 25, 267-77.
51. Nyberg, L., Marklund, P., Persson, J., et al. (2003). Common prefrontal activations during working memory, episodic memory, and semantic memory. Neuropsychologia, 41, 371-7.
52. Phan, K.L., Magalhaes, A., Ziemlewicz, T.J., Fitzgerald, D.A., Green, C., Smith, W. (2005). Neural correlates of telling lies: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study at 4 Tesla. Academic Radiology, 12, 164-72.
53. Raine, A., Lencz, T., Bihrle, S., LaCasse, L., Colletti, P. (2000). Reduced prefrontal gray matter volume and reduced autonomic activity in antisocial personality disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 57, 119-27.
54. Ranganath, C., Johnson, M.K., D'Esposito, M. (2003). Prefrontal activity associated with working memory and episodic long-term memory. Neuropsychologia, 41, 378-89.
55. Rosenfeld, J.P., Cantwell, B., Nasman, V.T., Wojdac, V., Ivanov, S., Mazzeri, L. (1988). A modified, event-related potential-based guilty knowledge test. International Journal of Neuroscience, 42, 157-61.
56. Rosenfeld, J.P. (2002). Event-related potentials in the detection of deception, malingering, and false memories. In: Kleiner, M., editor. Handbook of polygraph testing. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 265-86.
57. Rosenfeld, J.P., Soskins, M., Bosh, G., Ryan, A. (2004). Simple, effective countermeasures to P300-based tests of detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 41, 205-19.
58. Rosenfeld, J.P., Biroschak, J.R., Furedy, J.J. (2006). P300-based detection of concealed autobiographical versus incidentally acquired information in target and non-target paradigms. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 60, 251-9.
59. Russ, M.O., Mack, W., Grama, C., Lanfermann, H., Knopf, M. (2003). Enactment effect in memory: evidence concerning the function of the supramarginal gyrus. Experimental Brain Research, 149, 497-504.
60. Sip, K.E., Roepstorff, A., McGregor, W., Frith, C.D. (2008). Detecting deception: the scope and limits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 48-53.
61. Spence, S.A., Farrow, T.F., Herford, A.E., Wilkinson, I.D., Zheng, Y., Woodruff, P.W. (2001). Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans. Neuroreport, 12, 2849-53.
62. Strange, B.A., Henson, R.N., Friston, K.J., Dolan, R.J. (2000). Brain mechanisms for detecting perceptual, semantic, and emotional deviance. Neuroimage, 12, 425-33.
63. van Hooff, J.C., Brunia, C.H., Allen, J.J. (1996). Event-related potentials as indirect measures of recognition memory. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 15-31.
64. Vasey, M.W., Thayer, J.F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 24, 479-86.
65. Venables, P.H., Christie, M.J. (1980). Electrodermal activity. In: Martin, I., Venables, P.H., editors. Techniques in Psychophysiology. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 3-67.
66. Verschuere, B., Crombez, G., De Clercq, A., Koster, E.H.W. (2004). Autonomic and behavioral responding to concealed information: differentiating orienting and defensive responses. Psychophysiology, 41, 461-6.
67. Wagner, A.D., Desmond, J.E., Glover, G.H., Gabrieli, J.D. (1998). Prefrontal cortex and recognition memory. Functional-MRI evidence for contextdependent retrieval processes. Brain, 121, 1985-2002.
68. Wolpe, P.R., Foster, K.R., Langleben, D.D. (2005). Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: Promises and perils. The American Journal of Bioethics, 5, 39-49.