A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men

Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 295-305

  Kozel, F Andrew ^a   Revell, Letty J ^b   Lorberbaum, Jeffrey P ^b   Shastri, Ananda ^b   Elhai, Jon D ^b   Horner, Michael David ^b   Smith, Adam ^b   Nahas, Ziad ^b   Bohning, Daryl E ^b   George, Mark S ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN REGION; CINGULATE GYRUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORBITAL CORTEX; PILOT STUDY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

EID: 4544294534     PISSN: 08950172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1176/jnp.16.3.295     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Wiley S: Deception and Detection in Psychiatric Diagnosis. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1998; 21:870-893
2. Furedy JJ: Lie Detection as Psychophysiological Differentiation: Some Fine Lines. In: Coles MG, Donchin E, Porges SW, eds. Psychophysiology Systems, Processes and Applications. New York, NY: The Guilford Press; 1986: 683-701
3. Yankee WJ: The current status of research in forensic psychophysiology and its application in the psychophysiological detection of deception. J Forensic Sci. 1995; 40:63-68
4. Honts CR, Raskin DC, Kircher JC: Effects of physical counter-measures and their electromyographic detection during polygraph tests for deception. J Psychophys. 1987; 1:241-247
5. Ben-Shakhar G, Dolev K: Psychophysiological detection through the guilty knowledge technique: Effect of mental countermeasures. J App Psychol. 1996; 81:273-281
6. Steinbrook R: The polygraph test: A flawed diagnostic method. New England Journal of Medicine. 1992; 327:122-123
7. Brett AS, Phillips M, Beary FJ III: Predictive Power of the Polygraph: Can the "Lie Detector" Really Detect Liars? Lancet i. 1986; 8480:544
8. Lykken DT: A tremor in the blood: Use and abuse of the lie detector. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1998
9. Lubow RE, Fein O: Pupillary size in response to a visual guilty knowledge test: New technique for the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 1996; 2:164-177
10. Ekman P, O'Sullivan M, Friesen WV, et al.: Invited article: Face, voice and body in detecting deceit. J Nonverb Behav. 1991; 15:125-135
11. Sporer SL: The less travelled road to truth: Verbal cues in deception detection in accounts of fabricated and self-experiences events. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 1997; 11:373-397
12. Sheehan PW, Statham D: Associations between lying and hypnosis: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Experimental & Clinical Hypnosis. 1988; 5:87-94
13. Pavlidis I, Eberhardt NL, Levine JA: Seeing though the face of deception: Thermal imaging offers a promising hands-off approach to mass security screening. Nature. 2002; 415:35
14. Farwell LA, Donchin E: The Truth Will Out: Interrogative Polygraphy ("Lie Detection") With Brain Evoked Potentials. Psychophysiology. 1991; 28:531-547
15. Elliott R, Rubinsztein JS, Sahakian BJ, Dolan RJ: Selective attention to emotional stimuli in a verbal go/no-go task: an fMRI study. Neuroreport. 2000; 11:1739-1744
16. Pardo JV, Fox PT, Raichle ME: Localization of a human system for sustained attention by positron emission tomography. Nature. 1991; 349:61-64
17. George MS, Ketter TA, Parekh PI, et al.: Blunted Left Cingulate Activation in Mood Disorder Subjects During a Response Interference Task (The Stroop). Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 1997; 9:55-63
18. Bush G, Whalen PJ, Rosen BR, et al.: The counting Stroop: an interference task specialized for functional neuroimaging-validation study with functional MRI. Human Brain Mapping. 1998; 6:270-282
19. Rauch SL, Savage CR: Neuropsychiatry of the Basal Ganglia: Neuroimaging and Neuropsychology of the Striatum. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1997; 20:741-768
20. Lorberbaum JP, Newman JD, Dubno JR, et al.: Feasibility of using fMRI to study mothers responding to infant cries. Depression and Anxiety. 1999; 10:99-104
21. O'Doherty J, Kringelbach ML, Rolls ET, et al.: Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human cortex. Nature Neuroscience. 2001; 4:95-102
22. MacDonald AW III, Cohen JD, Stenger VA, Carter CS. Dissociating the Role of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Anterior Cingulate Cortex in Cognitive Control. Science. 2000; 288:1835-1838
23. Critchley HD, Elliott R, Mathias CJ, et al.: Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Response: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study. J Neurosci. 2000; 20:3033-3040
24. Shastri A, Lomarev MP, Nelson SJ, et al.: A Low-Cost System for Monitoring Skin Conductance During Functional MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 14:187-193
25. Spence SA, Farrow T, Herford A, et al.: Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deceptions in humans. Neuro Report. 2001; 12:2849-2853
26. Langleben DD, Schroeder L, Maldjian J, et al.: Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resources study. Neuro Image. 2002; 15:727-732
27. st Annual Meeting; 11 Nov. 2001, San Diego, Ca, Abstract #80.5
28. Annett M: A classification of hand preference by association analysis. Br J Psychol. 1970; 61:303-321
29. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain 3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging. New York, NY: Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 1988
30. Lancaster, JL, Rainey LH, Summerlin JL, et al.: Automated labeling of the human brain: A preliminary report on the development and evaluation of a forward-transform method. Human Brain Mapping. 1997; 5:238-242.
31. Tardif HA, Barry RJ, Fox AM, et al.: Detection of feigned recognition memory impairment using the old/new effect of the event-related potential. Int J Psychophysiol. 2000; 36:1-9
32. Samuel M, Williams SCR, Leigh PN, et al.: Exploring the temporal nature of hemodynamic response of cortical motor areas using fMRI. Neurology. 1998; 51:1567-1575
33. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, et al.: Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. J Neurosci. 1997; 17:353-362.
34. Fernandez G, de Greiff A, von Oertzen J, et al.: Language mapping in less than 15 minutes: real-time functional MRI during routine clinical investigation. Neuroimage. 2001; 14:585-94.
35. van Honk J, Schutter DJLG, d'Alfonso A, et al.: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation at the Frontopolar Cortex Reduces Skin Conductance but Not Heart Rate: Reduced Gray Matter Excitability in Orbitofrontal Regions. Letter to the Editor. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001; 58:973-974.
36. Raine A, Lencz T, Bihrle S, et al.: Reduced Prefrontal Gray Matter Volume and Reduced Autonomic Activity in Antisocial Personality Disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2000; 57:119-127.
37. Critchley HD, Melmed RN, Featherstone E, et al.: Volitional Control of Autonomic Arousal: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Study. NeuroImage. 2002; 16:909-918.