All that glitters is not gold: The case of calibrating hydrological models

Hydrological Processes

Volumn 26, Issue 14, 2012, Pages 2206-2210

  Andréassian, Vazken ^a   Le Moine, Nicolas ^b   Perrin, Charles ^a   Ramos, Maria Helena ^a   Oudin, Ludovic ^b   Mathevet, Thibault ^c   Lerat, Julien ^d   Berthet, Lionel ^e  

^a Procédés biotechnologiques au service de l'environnement   (France)

^b SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^c Direction Technique Générale   (France)

^d CSIRO   (Australia)

^e DREAL Auvergne   (France)

Author keywords

Calibration; Miscalibration; Overcalibration

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863491952     PISSN: 08856087     EISSN: 10991085     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9264     Document Type: Note

References (36)

1. Andrews FT, Croke BFW, Jakeman AJ. 2011. An open software environment for hydrological model assessment and development. Environmental Modelling and Software 26(10): 1171-1185.
2. Bardossy A, Singh SK. 2008. Robust estimation of hydrological model parameters. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 12: 1273-1283.
3. Bergström S. 1991. Principles and confidence in hydrological modelling. Nordic Hydrology 22: 123-136.
4. Berthet L, Andréassian V, Perrin C, Loumagne C. 2010. How significant are quadratic criteria? Part 2. On the relative contribution of large flood events to the value of a quadratic criterion. Hydrological Sciences Journal 55(6): 1063-1073.
5. Beven KJ. 1993. Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Advances in Water Resources 16: 41-51.
6. Efstratiadis A, Koutsoyiannis D. 2010. One decade of multi-objective calibration approaches in hydrological modelling: a review. Hydrological Sciences Journal 55(1): 58-78.
7. Ehret U, Zehe E. 2011. Series distance - an intuitive metric to quantify hydrograph similarity in terms of occurrence, amplitude and timing of hydrological events. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15(3): 877-896.
8. Ewen J. 2011. Hydrograph matching method for measuring model performance. Journal of Hydrology 408(1-2): 178-187.
9. Fenicia F, Savenije HHG, Matgen P, Pfister L. 2008. Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement. Water Resources Research 44(1): W01402. DOI:10.1029/2006WR005563.
10. Fernandez W, Vogel RM, Sankarasubramanian S. 2000. Regional calibration of a watershed model. Hydrological Sciences Journal 45(5): 689-707.
11. Gupta HV, Kling H, Yilmaz KK, Martinez GF. 2009. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology 377(1-2): 80-91.
12. Jakeman AJ, Hornberger GM. 1993. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall-runoff model? Water Resources Research 29(8): 2637-2649.
13. Johnston PR, Pilgrim DH. 1973. A study of Parameter Optimisation for a Rainfall-runoff Model. Water Research Laboratory of the University of new South Wales: Manly Vale, N.S.W.
14. Kavetski D, Clark MP. 2010. Numerical troubles in conceptual hydrology: approximations, absurdities and impact on hypothesis testing. Hydrological Processes 25(4): 661-670.
15. Kavetski D, Kuczera G. 2007. Model smoothing strategies to remove microscale discontinuities and spurious secondary optima in objective functions in hydrological calibration. Water Resources Research 43(3): W03411. DOI:10.1029/2006WR005195.
16. Koren V, Smith M, Duan Q. 2003. Use of a priori parameter estimates in the derivation of spatially consistent parameter sets of rainfall-runoff models. In Calibration Watershed Models, Water Science Application 6. AGU, Duan Q, Gupta H, Sorooshian S, Rousseau A, Turcotte R (Eds.) 239-254.
17. Kuzmin V, Seo DJ, Koren V. 2008. Fast and efficient optimization of hydrologic model parameters using a priori estimates and stepwise line search. Journal of Hydrology 353: 109-128.
18. Leavesley G, Hay LE, Viger RJ, Marstrom SL. 2003. Use of a priori parameter-estimation methods to constrain calibration of distributed-parameter models. In Calibration Watershed Models Water Science Application, Duan Q, Gupta H, Sorooshian S, Rousseau A, Turcotte R (Eds.) 255-266.
19. Ljung L. 1998. System Identification: Theory for the User, 2nd Edition. Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N J, 519 p.
20. Michel C, Perrin C, Andréassian V, Oudin L, Mathevet T. 2006. Has basin-scale modelling advanced beyond empiricism? In: Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization. Results of the Model Parameter Experiment - MOPEX, Andréassian V, Hall A, Chahinian N, Schaake J (Eds.) IAHS Publication 307. IAHS: Wallingford.
21. Oudin L, Andréassian V, Mathevet T, Perrin C, Michel C. 2006. Dynamic averaging of rainfall-runoff model simulations from complementary model parameterization. Water Resources Research 42(7): W07410. DOI:10.1029/2005WR004636.
22. Parajka J, Blöschl G, Merz R. 2007. Regional calibration of catchment models: potential for ungauged catchments. Water Resources Research 43(W06406). DOI:10.1029/2006WR005271.
23. Perrin C, Michel C, Andréassian V. 2001. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. Journal of Hydrology 242(3-4): 275-301.
24. Perrin C, Andréassian V, Mathevet T, Le Moine N. 2008. Discrete parameterization of hydrological models: evaluating the use of parameter sets libraries over 900 catchments. Water Resources Research 44: W08447. DOI:10.1029/2007WR006579.
25. Schoups G, Vrugt JA. 2010. A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non-Gaussian errors. Water Resources Research 46: W10531.
26. Seibert J, McDonnell JJ. 2002. On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration. Water Resources Research 38(11): 1241.
27. Sorooshian S, Gupta VK. 1983. Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: the question of parameter observability and uniqueness. Water Resources Research 19(1): 260-268.
28. Sorooshian S, Gupta H. 1995. Model calibration. In Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Singh VP (Ed.) Water Resources Publications: 23-68.
29. Sorooshian S, Gupta H, Fulton JL. 1983. Evaluation of maximum likelihood parameter estimation techniques for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: influence of calibration data variability and length on model credibility. Water Resources Research 19(1): 251-259.
30. Thiemann M, Trosset M, Gupta H, Sorooshian S. 2001. Bayesian recursive parameter estimation for hydrologic models. Water Resources Research 37(10): 2521-2535. DOI:10.1029/2000WR900405.
31. Thyer M, Kuczera G, Bates BC. 1999. Probabilistic optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: a comparison of the shuffled complex evolution and simulated annealing algorithms. Water Resources Research 35(3): 767-773.
32. Thyer M, Renard B, Kavetski D, Kuczera G, Franks SW, Srikanthan S. 2009. Critical evaluation of parameter consistency and predictive uncertainty in hydrological modeling: a case study using Bayesian total error analysis. Water Resources Research 45: W00B14.
33. Vrugt JA, Gupta HV, Bastidas LA, Bouten W, Sorooshian S. 2003. Effective and efficient algorithm for multiobjective optimization of hydrologic models. Water Resources Research 39(8): SWC51-SWC519.
34. Wagener T, McIntyre N, Lees M, Wheater H, Gupta H. 2003. Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: dynamic identifiability analysis. Hydrological Processes 17(2): 455-476.
35. Yang J, Reichert P, Abbaspour KC, Yang H. 2007. Hydrological modelling of the Chaohe basin in China: Statistical model formulation and Bayesian inference. Journal of Hydrology 340(3-4): 167-182.
36. Young PC. 2011. Recursive Estimation and Time-series Analysis. Springer: Heidelberg, 504.