Probabilistic optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: A comparison of the shuffled complex evolution and simulated annealing algorithms

Water Resources Research

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 767-773

  Thyer, Mark ^a   Kuczera, George ^a   Bates, Bryson C ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b University of Melbourne   (Australia)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBABILITY; RAIN; RUNOFF; SIMULATED ANNEALING;

CATCHMENTS; CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL-RUNOFF (CRR) MODELS; SHUFFLED COMPLEX EVOLUTION ALGORITHM; THREE-PHASE SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM;

WATERSHEDS;

ALGORITHM; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING;

EID: 0033105463     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/1998WR900058     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bates, B. C., Calibration of the SFB model using a simulated annealing approach. Proceedings of the Water Down Under 94 Conference, Natl. Conf. Publ. 94/15, vol. 3, pp. 1-6, Inst. of Eng., Canberra, A. C. T., Australia, 1994.
2. Boughton, W. C., A simple model for estimating the water yield of ungauged catchments. Aust. Civ. Eng. Trans., Inst. Eng. Aust., 26(2), 83-88, 1984.
3. Box, G. E. P., and D. R. Cox, An analysis of transformations, J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B, 26(2), 211-252, 1964.
4. Chiew, F. H. S., and T. A. McMahon, Complete set of daily rainfall, potential evapotranspiration and streamflow data for twenty eight unregulated Australian catchments, 53 pp., Cent. for Environ. and Appl. Hydrol., Univ. of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 1993.
5. Chiew F. H. S., M. J. Stewardson, and T. A. McMahon, Comparison of six rainfall-runoff modelling approaches, J. Hydrol., 147, 1-36, 1993.
6. Corana, A., M. Marchesi, C. Martini, and S. Ridella, Minimizing multimodal functions of continuous variables with the "simulated annealing" algorithm. Assoc. Comput. Mach. Trans. Math. Softw., 13(3), 262-280, 1987.
7. Dekkers, A., and E. Aarts, Global optimization and simulated annealing. Math. Prog., 50, 367-393, 1991.
8. Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. K. Gupta, Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour. Res., 24(7), 1163-1173, 1992.
9. Duan, Q., S. Sorooshian, and V. K. Gupta, Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models, J. Hydrol., 158, 265-284, 1994.
10. Gan, Y. G., and G. F. Biftu, Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: Optimization algorithms, catchment conditions, and model structure, Water Resour. Res., 32(12), 3513-1524, 1996.
11. Johnston, P. R., and D. H. Pilgrim, Parameter optimization for watershed models, Water Resour. Res., 12(3), 477-486, 1976.
12. Kirkpatrick, S., C. D. Gelatt, and M. P. Vecchi, Optimization by simulated annealing, Science, 220, 671-680, 1983.
13. Kuczera, G., Efficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models. Water Resour. Res., 33(1), 177-185, 1997.
14. Nathan, R. J., and T. A. McMahon, The SFB Model Part I-validation of fixed model parameters, Aust. Civ. Eng. Trans., Inst. Eng. Aust., 32(3), 166-162, 1990.
15. Nelder, J. A., and R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization, Comput. J., 7, 308-313, 1965.
16. Press, W. H. and S. A. Tcukolsky, Simulated annealing optimization over continuous spaces, Comput. Phys., 5(4), 426-429, 1991.
17. Sorooshian, S., O. Duan, and V. K. Gupta, Calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models using global optimization: Application to the Sacramento soil moisture accounting model, Water Resour. Res., 29(4), 1185-1194, 1993.
18. Sumner, N. R., P. M. Fleming, and B. C. Bates, Calibration of a modified SFB model for twenty-five Australian catchments using simulated annealing, J. Hydrol., 197, 166-188, 1997.
19. Ye, W., B. C. Bates, N. R. Viney, M. Sivapalan, and A. J. Jakeman, Performance of conceptual rainfall-runoff models in low-yielding ephemeral catchments, Water Resour. Res., 33(1), 153-166, 1997.