Team-based assessment of medical students in a clinical clerkship is feasible and acceptable

Medical Teacher

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 555-561

  Sharma, Nishan ^a   Cui, Ying ^b   Leighton, Jacqueline P ^b   White, Jonathan S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GROUP PROCESS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; NURSE; OBSERVATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT; PEER GROUP; STANDARD;

ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL; ALBERTA; CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; FACULTY, MEDICAL; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEEDBACK; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; NURSES; OBSERVATION; PATIENTS; PEER GROUP; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 84863448065     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.669083     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Alberta Physician Achievement Review 2009. Information about the PAR Program [Internet]. Edmonton: College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta. [Published 2009 June 1]. Available from: http://www.parprogram. org/.
2. Bunton SA, Sabalis RF, Sabharwal RK, Candler C, Mallon WT. 2008. Medical school expansion: Challenges and strategies. Washington DC: American Association of Medical Colleges.
3. Davies HA, Archer JC. 2005. Multi source feedback using Sheffield Peer Review Assessment Tool (SPRAT): Development and practical aspects. Clin Teach 2(2):77-81.
4. Edwards MR, Ewen AJ. 1996. 360 Feedback-The powerful new model for employee assessment & performance improvement. New York: AMACOM.
5. Evans AW, Leeson RMA, Newton John TR, Petrie A. 2005. The influence of self-deception and impression management upon self-assessment in oral surgery. Br Dent J 198:765-769. (Pubitemid 40910897)
6. Farmer EA, Beard JD, Dauphinee WD, LaDuca T, Mann KV. 2002. Assessing the performance of doctors in teams and systems. Med Educ 36:942-948. (Pubitemid 35286317)
7. Fleenor JW, Taylor S, Chappelow C. 2008. Leveraging the impact of 360-degree feedback. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
8. Foy NF, Schlisselberg G. 2002. Using 360-degree performance assessment techniques in student evaluation (Report no. NCRTL-TM034724). East Lansing, MI: National Center for Research on Teacher Learning. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. ED473152), 2002.
9. Frank JR, editor. 2005. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
10. Gordon J. 2003. Assessing students' personal and professional development using portfolios and interviews. Med Educ 37(4):335-340. (Pubitemid 36461305)
11. Hampton T. 2008. US medical school enrollment rising, but residency programs too limited. JAMA 299(24):2846. (Pubitemid 351930907)
12. Hesketh EA, Anderson F, Bagnall GM, Driver CP, Johnston DA, Marshall D, Needham G, Orr G, Walker K. 2005. Using a 360 degrees diagnostic screening tool to provide an evidence trail of junior doctor performance throughout their first postgraduate year. Med Teach 27(3):219-233. (Pubitemid 40974968)
13. Kaplan CB, Centor RM. 1990. The use of nurses to evaluate house officers' humanistic behavior. J Gen Intern Med 5: 410-414. (Pubitemid 20322524)
14. Lockyer JM, Clyman SG. 2008. Multisource feedback (360-degree evaluation). In: Holmbie ES, Hawkings RE, editors. Practical guide to the evaluation of clinical competence. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier. pp 75-85.
15. Pelling S, Kalen A, Hammar M, Wahlström O. 2011. Preparation for becoming members of health care teams: Findings from a 5-year evaluation of a student interprofessional training ward. J Interprof Care 25(5):328-332.
16. Rees C, Shepherd M. 2005. The acceptability of 360-degree judgments as a method of assessing undergraduate medical students' personal and professional behaviours. Med Educ 39(1):49-57.
17. Ricketts C, Bligh J. 2011. Developing a "frequent look and rapid remediation" assessment system for a new medical school. Acad Med 86(1):67-71.
18. Risucci DA, Tortolani AJ, Ward RJ. 1989. Ratings of surgical residents by self, supervisors, and peers. Surg Gynecol Obstet 169(6):519-526. (Pubitemid 20026314)
19. Schell SR, Lind DS. 2003. An Internet-based tool for evaluating third-year medical student performance. Am J Surg 185(3):211-215. (Pubitemid 36298884)
20. The Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada 2010. Canadian Medical Education Statistics 32:11. Available from http://www.afmc.ca/pdf/Cmes-2010- Shrink.pdf
21. Waldman D, Bowen D. 1998. The acceptability of 360- appraisals: A customer-SUPPL.ier relationship perspective. Hum Resour Manage 37(2):117-129.
22. Weinrich MD, Carline JD, Giles LM, Ramsey PG. 1993. Ratings of the performances of practicing internists by hospital-based registered nurses. Acad Med 68:680-687. (Pubitemid 23308149)
23. Woolliscroft JO, Howell JD, Patel BP, Swanson DB. 1994. Resident-patient interactions: The humanistic qualities of internal medicine residents assessed by patients, attending physicians, program supervisors and nurses. Acad Med 69(3):216-224. (Pubitemid 24083827)