Impact of a computerized system for evidence-based diabetes care on completeness of records: A before-after study

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Roshanov, Pavel S ^a   Gerstein, Hertzel C ^b,c   Hunt, Dereck L ^b,c   Sebaldt, Rolf J ^b   Haynes, R Brian ^b,c  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c HAMILTON HEALTH SCIENCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

CHRONIC DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; HUMANS; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; PHYSICIANS, FAMILY; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84863426448     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-63     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Computerized clinical decision support systems for primary preventive care: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Souza NM, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA, Prorok J, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski N, Haynes RB, the CCDSS Systematic Review Team, Implement Sci 2011 6 87 10.1186/1748-5908-6-87 21824381
2. Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve practitioners diagnostic test ordering behavior? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Roshanov PS, You JJ, Dhaliwal J, Koff D, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, the CCDSS Systematic Review Team, Implement Sci 2011 6 88 10.1186/1748-5908-6-88 21824382
3. Computerized clinical decision support systems for acute care management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review of effects on process of care and patient outcomes. Sahota N, Lloyd R, Ramakrishna A, Mackay J, Prorok J, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski N, Haynes RB, the CCDSS Systematic Review Team, Implement Sci 2011 6 91 10.1186/1748-5908-6-91 21824385
4. Computerized clinical decision support systems for drug prescribing and management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Hemens BJ, Holbrook AM, Tonkin M, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski N, Haynes RB, the CCDSS Systematic Review Team, Implement Sci 2011 6 89 10.1186/1748-5908-6-89 21824383
5. Computerized clinical decision support systems for therapeutic drug monitoring and dosing: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Nieuwlaat R, Connolly S, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, the CCDSS Systematic Review Team, Implement Sci 2011 6 90 10.1186/1748-5908-6-90 21824384
6. Computerized clinical decision support systems for chronic disease management: a decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review. Roshanov PS, Misra S, Gerstein HC, Garg AX, Sebaldt RJ, Mackay JA, Weise-Kelly L, Navarro T, Wilczynski NL, Haynes RB, the CCDSS Systematic Review Team, Implement Sci 2011 6 92 10.1186/1748-5908-6-92 21824386
7. Shared electronic vascular risk decision support in primary care: Computerization of Medical Practices for the Enhancement of Therapeutic Effectiveness (COMPETE III) randomized trial. Holbrook A, Pullenayegum E, Thabane L, Troyan S, Foster G, Keshavjee K, Chan D, Dolovich L, Gerstein H, Demers C, Curnew G, Arch Intern Med 2011 171 1736 1744 10.1001/archinternmed. 2011.471 22025430
8. Individualized electronic decision support and reminders to improve diabetes care in the community: COMPETE II randomized trial. Holbrook A, Thabane L, Keshavjee K, Dolovich L, Bernstein B, Chan D, Troyan S, Foster G, Gerstein H, Can Med Assoc J 2009 181 37 44 10.1503/cmaj.081272
9. The Vermont Diabetes Information System: a cluster randomized trial of a population based decision support system. MacLean CD, Gagnon M, Callas P, J Gen Intern Med 2009 24 1303 1310 10.1007/s11606-009-1147-x 19862578
10. Clinic-based support to help overweight patients with type 2 diabetes increase physical activity and lose weight. Christian JG, Bessesen DH, Byers TE, Christian KK, Goldstein MG, Bock BC, Arch Intern Med 2008 168 141 146 10.1001/archinternmed.2007.13 18227359
11. Combined task delegation, computerized decision support, and feedback improve cardiovascular risk for type 2 diabetic patients: a cluster randomized trial in primary care. Cleveringa FG, Gorter KJ, van den Donk M, Rutten GE, Diabetes Care 2008 31 2273 2275 10.2337/dc08-0312 18796619
12. Improving diabetes care in practice: findings from the TRANSLATE trial. Peterson KA, Radosevich DM, OConnor PJ, Nyman JA, Prineas RJ, Smith SA, Arneson TJ, Corbett VA, Weinhandl JC, Lange CJ, Hannan PJ, Diabetes Care 2008 31 2238 2243 10.2337/dc08-2034 18809622
13. Outpatient assessment of Karlsburg Diabetes Management System-based decision support. Augstein P, Vogt L, Kohnert KD, Freyse EJ, Heinke P, Salzsieder E, Diabetes Care 2007 30 1704 1708 10.2337/dc06-2167 17468357
14. Effects of an automated electronic reminder in changing the antiplatelet drug-prescribing behavior among Italian general practitioners in diabetic patients: an intervention trial. Filippi A, Sabatini A, Badioli L, Samani F, Mazzaglia G, Catapano A, Cricelli C, Diabetes Care 2003 26 1497 1500 10.2337/diacare.26.5.1497 12716811
15. A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A, Murphy-Sheehy P, Gildesgame C, Chueh H, Barry MJ, Singer DE, Nathan DM, Diabetes Care 2003 26 750 757 10.2337/diacare.26.3.750 12610033
16. Computerized decision support based on a clinical practice guideline improves compliance with care standards. Lobach DF, Hammond W, Am J Med 1997 102 89 98 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00382-8 9209205
17. A computer-generated reminder system improves physician compliance with diabetes preventive care guidelines. Nilasena DS, Lincoln MJ, Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care 1995 640 645
18. Effects of the clinical environment on physicians response to postgraduate medical education. Mazzuca SA, Vinicor F, Einterz RM, Tierney WM, Norton JA, Kalasinski LA, Am Educ Res J 1990 27 473 488
19. Effect of enhanced feedback and brief educational reminder messages on laboratory test requesting in primary care: a cluster randomised trial. Thomas RE, Croal BL, Ramsay C, Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Lancet 2006 367 1990 1996 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68888-0 16782489
20. Point of service reminders for prescribing cardiovascular medications. Derose SF, Dudl JR, Benson VM, Contreras R, Nakahiro RK, Ziel FH, Am J Manag Care 2005 11 298 304 15898218
21. A randomized trial of electronic clinical reminders to improve quality of care for diabetes and coronary artery disease. Sequist TD, Gandhi TK, Karson AS, Fiskio JM, Bugbee D, Sperling M, Cook EF, Orav EJ, Fairchild DG, Bates DW, J Am Med Inform Assoc 2005 12 431 437 10.1197/jamia.M1788 15802479
22. The effect on cost of medical care for patients treated with an automated clinical audit system. Thomas JC, Moore A, Qualls PE, J Med Syst 1983 7 307 313 10.1007/BF00993294 6619687
23. A randomized controlled open trial of population-based disease and case management in a Medicare Plus Choice health maintenance organization. Martin DC, Berger ML, Anstatt DT, Wofford J, Warfel D, Turpin RS, Cannuscio CC, Teutsch SM, Mansheim BJ, Turpin RS, Prev Chronic Dis 2004 1 05 15670436
24. Improving residents compliance with standards of ambulatory care: results from the VA Cooperative Study on Computerized Reminders. Demakis JG, Beauchamp C, Cull WL, Denwood R, Eisen SA, Lofgren R, Nichol K, Woolliscroft J, Henderson WG, JAMA 2000 284 1411 1416 10.1001/jama.284.11.1411 10989404
25. Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of hypertension in general practice. Evaluation of patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based clinical decision support system. Hetlevik I, Holmen J, Kruger O, Scand J Primary Health Care 1999 17 35 40 10.1080/028134399750002872
26. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Zeger SL, Liang K-Y, Albert PS, Biometrics 1988 44 1049 1060 10.2307/2531734 3233245
27. StataCorp, Stata Statistical Software: Release 11 StataCorp LP, College Station, TX 2009
28. Electronically distributed, computer-generated, individualized feedback enhances the use of a computerized practice guideline. Lobach DF, Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp 1996 493 497
29. Prevalence of multimorbidity among adults seen in family practice. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Ann Family Med 2005 3 223 228 10.1370/afm.272