Methodological Options and Data Sources for the Development of Long-Distance Passenger Travel Demand Models: A Comprehensive Review

Transport Reviews

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 399-433

  Zhang, Lei ^a   Southworth, Frank ^b   Xiong, Chenfeng ^a   Sonnenberg, Anthon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INVESTMENT; METHODOLOGY; MODELING; ROAD TRANSPORT; TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE; TRANSPORTATION POLICY; TRAVEL DEMAND;

EUROPE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84863327521     PISSN: 01441647     EISSN: 14645327     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2012.688174     Document Type: Review

References (82)

1. Acutt, M. and Dodgson, J. 1996. Policy instruments and greenhouse gas emissions from transport in the UK. Fiscal Studies, 17(2): 65-82.
2. Agresti, A. 1990. Categorical data analysis, New York, NY: Wiley.
3. Aldian, A. and Taylor, M. A.P. 2003. Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for inter-city travel demand modelling. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 5: 1294-1307.
4. Ashiabor, S., Baik, H. and Trani, A. 2007. Logit models to forecast nationwide intercity travel demand in the United States. Journal of the Transportation Research Record, 2007: 1-12.
5. Baik, H., Trani, A., Hinze, N., Swingle, H., Ashiabor, S. and Seshadri, A. 2008. Forecasting model for air taxi, commercial airline, and automobile demand in the United States. Journal of the Transportation Research Record, 2052: 9-20.
6. Bel, G. 1997. Changes in travel time across modes and its impact on the demand for inter-urban rail travel. Transportation Research, 33E: 43-52.
7. Bell, M. 1991. The estimation of origin-destination matrices by constrained generalized least squares. Transportation Research, B25: 13-22.
8. Ben-Akiva, M., Gunn, H.F., van Vuren, T., & Hofman, F. (1998). The AIUTO project, implementation of a time dependent assignment at the Randstad test site. Presented at the 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerpen.
9. Beser, M. and Algers, S. 2001. "SAMPERS-The new Swedish national travel demand forecasting tool". In National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, Edited by: Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L.-G. 101-118. Stockholm: Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board.
10. Bhat, C. R. 1995. A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 29(6): 471-483.
11. Bhat, C. R. 1997. An endogenous segmentation mode choice model with an application to intercity travel. Transportation Science, 31(1): 34-48.
12. Blackstone, E. A., Buck, A. J. and Hakim, S. 2006. Determinants of airport choice in a multi-airport region. Atlantic Economic Journal, 34: 313-326.
13. Bostrom, R. 1998. The Kentucky statewide transportation focusing process, Irvine, CA: Kentucky Transportation Cabinet.
14. Brog, W., Erl, E., & Schulze, B. (2004). DATELINE: Concept and methodology. Paper presented at the 2004 European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
15. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. (1997). 1995 American travel survey. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation. Retrieved February 11, 2009, fromhttp://www.bts.gov/publications/1995_american_travel_survey/
16. Burgess, A., Chen, T.M., Snelder, M., Schneekloth, N., Korzhenevych, A., Szimba, E., Christidis, P. (2008). TRANS-TOOLS (TOOLS for TRansport forecasting ANd Scenario testing) (Final Report, Deliverable 6, Funded by the 6th Framework RTD Programme). Delft, The Netherlands: TNO Inro.
17. Caltrans. (2009). Statewide model framework. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Transportation.
18. Cambridge Systematics. (2006). Bay area/California high-speed rail ridership and revenue forecasting study. Interregional model system development. Cambridge, MA: Author.
19. Cambridge Systematics. (2008). National travel demand forecasting model phase I final scope. NCHRP Project 08-36, Task 70, National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
20. Cohen, H., Horowitz, A., & Pendyala, R. (2008). Forecasting statewide freight toolkit. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
21. Coldren, G. M., Koppelman, F. S., Kasturirangan, K. and Mukherjee, A. 2003. Modeling aggregate air travel itinerary shares: Logit model development at a major US airline. Journal of Air Transport Management, 9(6): 361-369.
22. Daly, A. 1998. "Updating and extending national models". In National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, Edited by: Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L.-G. 35-49. Stockholm: Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board.
23. Daly, A., Fox, J., & Tuinenga, J.G. (2005). Pivot-point procedures in practical travel demand forecasting. Paper presented at European Regional Science Association meeting, Amsterdam.
24. Davidson, P., & Clarke, P. (2004). Preparation of OD matrices for DATELINE. Paper presented at the 2004 European Transport Conference, Strasbourg, France.
25. Deming, W. E. and Stephan, F. F. 1940. On a least squares adjustment of a sampled frequency table when the expected marginal totals are known. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11: 427-444.
26. Domencich, T. A. and Kraft, G. 1970. Free transit, Lexington, MA: Heath Lexington Books.
27. Epstein, J. M., Parker, J., Cummings, D. and Hammond, R. A. 2008. Coupled contagion dynamics of fear and disease: Mathematical and computational explorations. PLoS ONE, 3(12): e3955 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003955
28. Faussett, K.M. (2005). MDOT's statewide household travel survey-design, implementation, and lessons learned. Unpublished paper. Retrieved March 29, 2010, fromhttp://www.morpace.com/TRB-Conference-2.PDF
29. FHWA. (1999). Guidebook on statewide travel forecasting. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved February 9, 2009, fromhttp://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/statewide/swtravel.pdf
30. FHWA. (2011). Freight analysis framework, version 3. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration. Retrieved April 3, 2011, fromhttp://www.cta-gis.ornl.gov/faf/
31. Fosgerau, M. (1998). PETRA-an activity-based approach to travel demand analysis. Paper presented at the 8th World Conference on Transport Research, Antwerp, Belgium.
32. Fox, J., Daly, A. and Gunn, H. 2003. Review of RAND Europe's transport demand model systems, Leiden, The Netherlands: RAND Corp.
33. Gaudry, M. 2001. "Test of nonlinearity, modal captivity and spatial competition within the STEMM multicountry applications for passengers". In National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, Edited by: Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L.-G. 170-187. Stockholm: Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board.
34. Gelhausen, M.C., & Wilken, D. (2006). Airport and access mode choice: A generalized nested logit model approach. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. Paper No. 11957. Retrieved March 29, 2010, fromhttp://www.mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/11957/2/MPRA_paper_11957.pdf
35. Giaimo, G.T., & Schiffer, R. (Eds.). (2005, August). Statewide travel demand modeling: A peer exchange. Transportation Research Circular, #E-C075. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
36. Goodman, L. A. 1971. The analysis of multidimensional contingency tables: Stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classifications. Technometrics, 13: 33-61.
37. Gosling, G.D. (2008). Airport ground access mode choice models. A synthesis of airport practice. ACRP synthesis 5. Airport Cooperative Research Program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
38. Gunn, H. F. 2001a. "An overview of european national models". In National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, Edited by: Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L. G. 19-34. New York, NY: Springer.
39. Gunn, H. F. 2001b. Spatial and temporal transferability of relationships between travel demand, trip cost and travel time. Transport Research Part E, 37: 163-189.
40. Gunn, H.F., Mijjer, P.H., Lindveldt, K., & Hofman, F. (1997). Estimating base matrices: The combined calibration method. In Proceedings of the PTRC Summer Annual Meeting, London, UK.
41. Hague Consulting Group (HCG), et al. (2000). EXPEDITE. EXPert-system based PrEdictions of Demand for Internal Transport in Europe. Review of European and national passenger and freight market forecasting systems. Prepared for the European Commission Directorate-General for Energy & Transport, Brussels, Belgium.
42. Hansen, S., Nielsen, O.A., & Frederiksen, R.D. (2008). Adjustment of trips-matrices in large-scale networks. Paper presented at the 2008 European Transport Conference, Leeuwenhorst, The Netherlands.
43. Hess, S. (2004). An analysis of airport-choice behaviour using the mixed multinomial logit model. Retrieved February 9, 2009, fromhttp://www-sre.wu-wien.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa04/PDF/61.pdf
44. Hilferink, P. (1997). Cost-efficient origin-destination estimator: OD-ESTIM (Final Summary Report). Transport Research & Innovation Portal (TRIP). Directorate General for Mobility and Transport, European Commission.
45. Hofman, F. 2001. "Application areas for the Dutch national model". In National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, Edited by: Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L.-G. 81-92. Stockholm: Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board.
46. Horowitz, A.J. (2006). Statewide travel forecasting models (NCHRP Synthesis #358). Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
47. Horowitz, A.J. (2008). White paper: Statewide travel demand forecasting. NCHRP Project 08-36, Task 76c, National Cooperative Highway Research Program. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board.
48. Jin, X. and Horowitz, A. J. 2008. Time-of-day choice modeling for long-distance trips. Transportation Research Record, 2076: 200-208.
49. Koppelman, F. S. 1990. Multidimensional model system for intercity travel choice behavior. Transportation Research Record, 1241: 1-8.
50. Koppelman, F. S. and Sethi, V. 2005. Incorporating variance and covariance heterogeneity in the generalized nested logit model: An application to modeling long distance travel choice behavior. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 39(9): 825-853.
51. Leitham, S., Downing, J., Martino, A., & Fiorello, D. (1999). European transport forecasts for 2020: The STREAMS model results. In Proceedings of the ETC '99, Cambridge.
52. Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L. G. 2001. National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, New York, NY: Springer.
53. Mannering, F. L. 1983. An econometric analysis of vihicle use in multivehicle households. Transportation Research Part A: General, 17(3): 183-189.
54. Miller, E. J. 2003. "Microsimulation". In Transportation systems planning: Methods and applications, Edited by: Goulias, K. G. 12-1-12-22. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. Chap. 12
55. Miller, E. J. 2004. The trouble with intercity travel demand models. Transportation Research Record, 1895: 94-101.
56. MW Consulting and PB Consult, Inc. (2002). The Oregon Modeling Improvement Program: An Overview. Salem, OR: Oregon Department of Transportation.
57. Nie, Y., Zhang, H. M. and Recker, W. W. 2005. Inferring origin-destination trip matrices with a decoupled GLS path flow estimator. Transportation Research, 39B: 497-518.
58. Nielsen, O. A. 1998. "Two new methods for estimating trip matrices from traffic counts". In Chapter in travel behaviour research: Updating the state of play, Edited by: Ortúzar, H. D., Hensher, D. and Jara-Díaz, D. 221-250. Oxford: Elsevier Science Ltd.
59. Nielsen, O.A. (2007). European TRANS-TOOLS transport model course. Lyngby, Denmark: Technical University of Denmark. Retrieved November 16, 2009, fromftp://ftp.jrc.es/users/transtools/public/Documentation/
60. Nuzzolo, A., Crisalli, U. and Gangemi, F. 2000. A behavioural choice model for the evaluation of railway supply and pricing policies. Transportation Research A, 34: 395-404.
61. Oum, T. H. and Gillen, D. W. 1983. The structure of intercity travel demands in Canada: Theory tests and empirical results. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 17(3): 175-191.
62. Peter Davidson Consultancy. 2000. MYSTIC toward origin-destination matrices for Europe, London: Author.
63. Rios, A., Nozick, L. K. and Turnquist, M. A. 2003. Value of different categories of information in estimating freight origin-destination tables. Transportation Research Record, 1783: 42-48.
64. Rohr, C., Fox, J., Daly, A., Patruni, B., Patil, S., & Tsang, F. (2010). Modelling long-distance travel in the UK. Paper presented at the 2010 European Transport Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, UK.
65. Sherali, H. D., Sivanandan, R. and Hobeika, A. G. 1994. A linear programming approach for synthesizing origin-destination trip tables from link traffic volumes. Transportation Research B, 28: 213-233.
66. Souleyrette, R.R., Hans, Z.N., & Pathak, S. (1996, November). Statewide transportation planning model and methodology development program. Ames: Iowa State University.
67. Southworth, F., & Hu, P.S. (2010). The American long distance personal travel data and modeling program: A roadmap. Revised draft. Prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC.
68. Southworth, F., & Peterson, B.E. (2005). Generation of a US commodity flows matrix using log-linear modeling and iterative proportional fitting. Prepared for the Office of Operations, Freight Management and Operations, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, DC. Retrieved February 9, 2009, fromhttp://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/faf2_reports/report3/index.htm
69. Sveder, G. J. 2001. "The new Swedish national model-SAMPERS: System and validation". In National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, Edited by: Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L.-G. 93-100. Stockholm: Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board.
70. Swiss Federal Statistical Office. (2006). Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2005 zum Verkehrsverhalten. Neuchatel: Swiss Federal Statistical Office.
71. Volpe Center. (2008). Evaluation of high-speed rail options in the Macon-Atlanta-Greenville-Charlotte rail corridor. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center Cambridge, MA. Prepared for the Georgia Department of Transportation, Atlanta, GA.
72. Wardman, M. 1997. Inter-urban rail demand, elasticities, and competition in Great Britain: Evidence from direct demand models. Transportation Research, 33E: 15-28.
73. Wardman, M. 2001. A review of British evidence on time and service quality valuation. Transportation Research Part E, 37(18): 107-128.
74. Weiner, E. 1976. Assessing national urban transportation policy alternatives. Transportation Research, 10: 159-178.
75. Willekens, F. J. 1983. Log-linear modeling of spatial interaction. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 52: 87-205.
76. Williams, I. 2001. "Designing the STREAMS model of Europe". In National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, Edited by: Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L.-G. 159-169. Stockholm: Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board.
77. Winston, C. 1985. Research on intercity freight and passenger transportation; an economist's perspective. Transportation Research Part A: General, 19(5-6): 491-494.
78. Worsley, T. E. and Harris, R. C.E. 2001. "GB traffic forecasts-status and development". In National transport models: Recent developments and prospects, Edited by: Lundqvist, L. and Mattsson, L.-G. 146-155. Stockholm: Swedish Transport and Communications Research Board.
79. Wrigley, N. 1985. Categorical data analysis for geographers and environmental scientists, Caldwell, NJ: The Blackburn Press.
80. Yang, H., Sasaki, T., Iida, Y. and Asakura, Y. 1992. Estimation of origin-destination matrices from link traffic counts on congested networks. Transportation Research B, 26: 417-434.
81. Yao, E., & Morikawa, T. (2003). A study on integrated intercity travel demand model. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Travel Behavior Research, Lucerne.
82. Zhang, L., Xiong, C., & Berger, K. (2010). Multimodal inter-regional origin-destination demand estimation: A review of methodologies and their applicability to national-level travel analysis in the US WCTR. Lisbon, Portugal, July, 2010.