Incorporating variance and covariance heterogeneity in the Generalized Nested Logit model: An application to modeling long distance travel choice behavior

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2005, Pages 825-853

  Koppelman, Frank S ^a   Sethi, Vaneet ^b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ZS Associates   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DECISION MAKING; ERROR ANALYSIS; LOCATION;

INDEPEDENTLY AND IDENTICALLY DISTRIBUTED (IID); MULTINOMIAL LOGIT (MNL);

TRANSPORTATION;

LOGIT ANALYSIS; MODELING; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 15844361910     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2004.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Aptech Systems. Gauss Applications, 1995. Constrained Maximum Likelihood. Aptech Systems, Inc., Maple Valley, WA, 1995
2. Beser, M., Algers, S., 2002. SAMPERS: The new Swedish national travel demand forecasting tool. In: Lundqvist, L., Mattsson, L.-G. (Eds.), National Transport Models: Recent Developments
3. C.R. Bhat A nested logit model with covariance heterogeneity Transportation Research, Part B 31 1997 11-21
4. C.R. Bhat F.S. Koppelman Activity-based modeling of travel demand In: H. Randolph (Ed.), Handbook of Transportation Science 1999 Elsevier Publishing
5. M.A. Bradley A. Daly Use of logit scaling approach to test for rank-order and fatigue effects in stated preference data Transportation 21 1994 167-184
6. M. Bradley E. Kroes Forecasting issues in stated preference survey research In: E.S. Ampt A.J. Richardson A.H. Meyburg (Eds.), Selected Readings in Transport Survey Methodology 1992 Eucalyptus Press Melbourne, Australia 89-107
7. C. Daganzo Multinomial Probit: The Theory and its Application to Demand Forecasting 1979 Academic Press New York
8. T.A. Domencich D. McFadden Urban Travel Demand - A Behavioral Analysis 1975 American Elsevier Publishing Company, Inc. New York
9. C.V. Forinash F.S. Koppelman Application and interpretation of nested logit models of intercity mode choice Transportation Research Record 1413 1993 98-106
10. Gliebe, J.P., Koppelman, F.S., Ziliaskopoulos, A., 1999. Route choice using a paired combinatorial logit model. Proceedings of the 78th Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC
11. A. Grayson Disaggregate model of mode choice in intercity travel Transportation Research Record 835 1979 36-42
12. D.A. Hensher Intercity rail services: A nested logit stated choice analysis of pricing options Journal of Advanced Transportation 32 2 1998 130-181
13. D. Hensher J. Louviere J. Swait Combining sources of preference data Journal of Econometrics 89 1999 197-221
14. McFadden, D., 1975. On independence, structure, and simultaneity in transportation demand analysis. Working Paper No. 7511, Urban Travel Demand Forecasting Project, Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineering, University of California, Berkeley
15. A. Papola Some developments on the cross-nested logit model Transportation Research B 38 9 2004 833-851
16. Stopher, P.R., Prashker, J.N., 1976. Intercity passenger forecasting: the use of current travel forecasting procedures. In: Proceeding, Transportation Research Forum: 17th Annual Meeting, vol. 17 (1), pp. 67-75
17. J. Swait Choice set generation within the generalized extreme value family of discrete choice models Transportation Research B 35 7 2001 643-666
18. J. Swait W. Adamowicz Choice environment, market complexity, and consumer behavior: A theoretical and empirical approach for incorporating decision complexity into models of consumer choice Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 2 2001 141-167
19. P. Vovsha Application of cross-nested logit model to mode choice in Tel Aviv, Israel, Metropolitan Area Transportation Research Record 1607 1997 6-15
20. C.H. Wen F.S. Koppelman The generalized nested logit model Transportation Research B 35 7 2001 627-641
21. H.C.W.L. Williams J.D. Ortuzar Behavioral theories of dispersion and the mis-specification of travel demand models Transportation Research B 16 3 1982 167-219