The effects of winning and losing on perceived group variability

Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

Volumn 48, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 1094-1099

  Badea, Constantina ^a,d   Brauer, Markus ^b,e   Rubin, Mark ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS OUEST NANTERRE LA DÉFENSE   (France)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ CLERMONT AUVERGNE   (France)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cohesiveness; Performance; Variability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84863311904     PISSN: 00221031     EISSN: 10960465     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2012.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Badea C., Askevis-Leherpeux F. Catégorisations inclusives et jugements de variabilité: Comment annuler les effets du statut numérique. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale / International Revue of Social Psychology 2005, 18:5-23.
2. Badea C., Deschamps J.C. Perception d'homogénéité intragroupe et dynamique du statut social. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale / International Revue of Social Psychology 2009, 29:91-115.
3. Berdahl J.L., Martorana P. Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion. European Journal of Social Psychology 2006, 36:497-509.
4. Brauer M. Intergroup perception in the social context: The effects of social status and group membership on out-group homogeneity and ethnocentrism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2001, 37:15-31.
5. Brauer M., Bourhis R. Social power. European Journal of Social Psychology 2006, 36:601-616.
6. Brauer M., Er-rafiy A. Increasing perceived variability reduces prejudice and discrimination. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2011, 47:871-881.
7. Brown R., Smith A. Perceptions of and by minority groups: The case of women in academia. European Journal of Social Psychology 1989, 19:61-75.
8. Cabecinhas R., Amâncio L. Asymmetries in the perception of other as a function of social position and context. Swiss Journal of Psychology 1999, 58:40-50.
9. Chappe B., Brauer M., Castano E. Advantaged groups are more variable than disadvantaged groups: The case of preferences and habits. Current Psychology of Cognition 2004, 22:407-425.
10. Farris G.F., Lim F.G. Effects of performance on leadership cohesiveness, influence, satisfaction, and subsequent performance. Journal of Applied Psychology 1969, 53:490-497.
11. Fiske A.P., Haslam N., Fiske S. Confusing one person with another: What errors revel about the elementary forms of social relations?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1991, 60:656-674.
12. Fullagar C.J., Egleston D.O. Norming and performing: Using microworlds to understand the relationship between team cohesiveness and performance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2008, 2008(38):2574-2593.
13. Goethals G.R., Klein W.M. Interpreting and inventing social reality: Attributional and constructive elements in social comparison. The handbook of social comparison: Theory and research 2000, 23-44. Plenum, New York, NY. J. Suls, L. Wheeler (Eds.).
14. Guinote A., Judd C.M., Brauer M. Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: Evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2002, 82:708-721.
15. Holtgraves T. Communication in context: Effects of speaker status on the comprehension of indirect requests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 1994, 20:1205-1218.
16. Imai K., Keele L., Tingley D. A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychological Methods 2010, 15:309-334.
17. Jehn K.A., Northcraft G.B., Neale M.A. Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 1999, 44:741-763.
18. Jost J.T., Banaji M.R. The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology 1994, 33:1-27.
19. Lopes D., Vala J., Garcia-Marques L. Social validation of knowledge: Heterogeneity and consensus functionality. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 2007, 11:223-239.
20. Lorenzi-Cioldi F. Group status and perceptions of homogeneity. European Review of Social Psychology 1998, Vol. 9:31-75. Wiley, Chichester, England.
21. Lorenzi Cioldi F., Deaux K., Dafflon A.C. Group homogeneity as a function of relative social status. Swiss Journal of Psychology 1998, 57:255-273.
22. Mullen B., Copper C. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin 1994, 115:210-227.
23. Murnighan J.K., Conlon D.E. The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly 1991, 36:165-186.
24. O'Reilly C.A., Caldwell D.F., Barnett W.P. Work group demography, social integration, and turnover. Administrative Science Quarterly 1989, 34:21-37.
25. Ostrom T.M., Sedikides C. Out-group homogeneity effects in natural and minimal groups. Psychological Bulletin 1992, 112:536-552.
26. Overbeck J.R., Tieden L.Z., Brion S. The powerful want to, the powerless have to: Perceived constraint moderates causal attributions. European Journal of Social Psychology 2006, 36:479-496.
27. Park B., Judd C.M. Measures and models of perceived group variability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1990, 59:173-191.
28. Quattrone G.A., Jones E.E. The perception of variability within in-groups and out-groups: Implication for the low of small numbers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980, 38:141-152.
29. Riordan C., Shore L. Demographic diversity and employee attitudes: Examination of relational demography within work units. Journal of Applied Psychology 1997, 82:342-358.
30. Rubin M., Badea C. Why do people perceive in-group homogeneity on in-group traits and out-group homogeneity on out-group traits?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 2007, 33:31-42.
31. Rubin M., Badea C. The central tendency of a social group can affect ratings of its intragroup variability in the absence of social identity concerns. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:410-415.
32. Sachdev I., Bourhis R. Power and status differentials in minority and majority group relations. European Journal of Social Psychology 1991, 21:1-24.
33. Simon B., Brown R. Perceived homogeneity in minority-majority contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1987, 53:703-711.
34. Simon B., Pettigrew T.F. Social identity and perceived group homogeneity: Evidence for the in-group homogeneity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology 1990, 20:269-286.
35. Simons T., Pelled L.H., Smith K.A. Making use of difference: Diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 1999, 42:662-674.
36. Taylor D.M., Doria J., Tyler J.K. Group performance and cohesiveness: an attribution analysis. Journal of Social Psychology 1983, 119:187-198.
37. Tsui A.S., Egan T.D., O'Reilly C.A. Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly 1992, 37:549-579.
38. Turner J.C., Hogg M.A., Turner P.J., Smith P.M. Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology 1984, 23:97-111.
39. Vala G., Drozda-Senkowska E., Oberlé D., Lopez D., Silva P. Group heterogeneity and social validation of everyday knowledge: The mediating role of perceived group participation. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations 2011, 10.1177/1368430210377215.
40. Voci A. Perceived group variability and the salience of personal and social identity. European Review of Social Psychology 2000, 11:177-221.
41. Wai-man Ip G., Chiu C., Wan C. Birds of a feather and birds flocking together: Physical versus behavioral cues may lead to trait- versus goal-based group perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2006, 90:368-381.